海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
21期
3166-3168
,共3页
郭维%陈恩%韦保林%傅金阶%罗晓曙
郭維%陳恩%韋保林%傅金階%囉曉曙
곽유%진은%위보림%부금계%라효서
宫外孕%阴道超声%腹部超声%诊断价值
宮外孕%陰道超聲%腹部超聲%診斷價值
궁외잉%음도초성%복부초성%진단개치
Ectopic pregnancy%Transvaginal ultrasound%Abdominal ultrasound%Diagnostic value
目的:探讨阴道超声联合腹部B超在宫外孕诊断上的应用价值,为宫外孕的早期诊断提供依据。方法对本院2011年12月至2013年12月收治的106例经手术或保守治疗确诊宫外孕患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,全部患者均行阴道超声及腹部超声检查,观察患者卵巢子宫旁有无异常,并对比阴道超声检查、经腹部B超检查以及二者联合检查宫外孕的阳性率及漏诊率情况。结果经腹部B超检测卵黄囊、胎芽、心搏和盆腔积液等阳性检出率均显著低于经阴道超声检查(P<0.05);阴道超声和腹部超声联合诊断为宫外孕者101例,诊断符合率为95.28%,漏诊5例占4.72%;单纯腹部超声诊断宫外孕79例,诊断符合率为74.53%,漏诊27例占25.47%;单纯阴道超声检查诊断为宫外孕者82例,诊断符合率为77.36%,漏诊24例占22.64%,阴道超声联合腹部B超与单纯腹部超声和单纯阴道超声比较,其诊断符合率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但阴道超声诊断符合率和腹部B超诊断符合率相近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论阴道超声联合腹部B超可显著提高宫外孕的诊断符合率,为临床提供了更方便、更快捷的诊断手段,提高了诊断的准确率,值得临床推广应用。
目的:探討陰道超聲聯閤腹部B超在宮外孕診斷上的應用價值,為宮外孕的早期診斷提供依據。方法對本院2011年12月至2013年12月收治的106例經手術或保守治療確診宮外孕患者的臨床資料進行迴顧性分析,全部患者均行陰道超聲及腹部超聲檢查,觀察患者卵巢子宮徬有無異常,併對比陰道超聲檢查、經腹部B超檢查以及二者聯閤檢查宮外孕的暘性率及漏診率情況。結果經腹部B超檢測卵黃囊、胎芽、心搏和盆腔積液等暘性檢齣率均顯著低于經陰道超聲檢查(P<0.05);陰道超聲和腹部超聲聯閤診斷為宮外孕者101例,診斷符閤率為95.28%,漏診5例佔4.72%;單純腹部超聲診斷宮外孕79例,診斷符閤率為74.53%,漏診27例佔25.47%;單純陰道超聲檢查診斷為宮外孕者82例,診斷符閤率為77.36%,漏診24例佔22.64%,陰道超聲聯閤腹部B超與單純腹部超聲和單純陰道超聲比較,其診斷符閤率差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05),但陰道超聲診斷符閤率和腹部B超診斷符閤率相近,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論陰道超聲聯閤腹部B超可顯著提高宮外孕的診斷符閤率,為臨床提供瞭更方便、更快捷的診斷手段,提高瞭診斷的準確率,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적:탐토음도초성연합복부B초재궁외잉진단상적응용개치,위궁외잉적조기진단제공의거。방법대본원2011년12월지2013년12월수치적106례경수술혹보수치료학진궁외잉환자적림상자료진행회고성분석,전부환자균행음도초성급복부초성검사,관찰환자란소자궁방유무이상,병대비음도초성검사、경복부B초검사이급이자연합검사궁외잉적양성솔급루진솔정황。결과경복부B초검측란황낭、태아、심박화분강적액등양성검출솔균현저저우경음도초성검사(P<0.05);음도초성화복부초성연합진단위궁외잉자101례,진단부합솔위95.28%,루진5례점4.72%;단순복부초성진단궁외잉79례,진단부합솔위74.53%,루진27례점25.47%;단순음도초성검사진단위궁외잉자82례,진단부합솔위77.36%,루진24례점22.64%,음도초성연합복부B초여단순복부초성화단순음도초성비교,기진단부합솔차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05),단음도초성진단부합솔화복부B초진단부합솔상근,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론음도초성연합복부B초가현저제고궁외잉적진단부합솔,위림상제공료경방편、경쾌첩적진단수단,제고료진단적준학솔,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the application value of transvaginal ultrasound combined with abdomi-nal B ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, and provide guidance for early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Methods The clinical data of 106 patients confirmed by surgery or conservative treatment as ectopic pregnancy in our hospital during December 2011 to December 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent transvagi-nal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound to observe the abnormality in ovaries and para-uterine area, and then the posi-tive rate and misdiagnosis rate of ectopic pregnancy were compared between patients examined by transvaginal ultra-sound, abdominal B ultrasound and combined ultrasound. Results The detection rate of yolk sac, fetal bud, cardiac and pelvic effusion in abdominal B was significantly lower than that in transvaginal sound (P<0.05). 101 cases of ecto-pic pregnancy were diagnosed by the combined ultrasound, where the diagnosis rate and misdiagnosis rate were 95.28%and 4.72%respectively. Meanwhile, 79 cases of ectopic pregnancy were diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound alone, where the diagnosis rate and misdiagnosis rate were 74.53%and 25.47%respectively. There were 82 cases of ectopic pregnancy were diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound alone with diagnose rate of 77.36% and misdiagnosis rate of 22.64%. There were statistically significant difference between combined ultrasound and transvaginal ultra-sound or abdominal ultrasound alone (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between transvaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound (P>0.05). Conclusion The transvaginal ultrasound combined ab-dominal B can significantly improve the diagnosis effect of ectopic pregnancy, which provides a more convenient and efficient diagnostic tool with a higher accuracy for diagnosis. Therefore, it is worthy of clinical application.