海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
21期
3151-3152,3153
,共3页
林秀欣%余更生%吕华珠%邓文静%方丽兰%周颖
林秀訢%餘更生%呂華珠%鄧文靜%方麗蘭%週穎
림수흔%여경생%려화주%산문정%방려란%주영
培美曲塞%多西他赛%非小细胞肺癌
培美麯塞%多西他賽%非小細胞肺癌
배미곡새%다서타새%비소세포폐암
Pemetrexed%Docetaxel%Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
目的:探讨培美曲塞与多西他赛治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的临床疗效及不良反应。方法选取2010年5月至2013年7月期间我院肿瘤科收治的晚期NSCLC患者86例。随机分为两组各43例,培美曲塞组患者给予培美曲塞二钠500 mg/m2,静脉滴注10 min;多西他赛组患者给予多西他赛75 mg/m2,静脉滴注1 h,21 d为1个疗程,两组均治疗两个疗程,评价两组患者的近期疗效和不良反应发生率。结果两组治疗NSCLC晚期患者的控制率与有效率方面比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),同时在腺癌、鳞癌、大细胞癌的控制率与有效率方面比较,两组的差异也均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组总的毒副反应发生率比较虽然差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但在胃肠道反应、骨髓抑制、肝毒性等不良反应的严重程度发生率方面比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论培美曲塞与多西他赛治疗NSCLC晚期患者的近期疗效无明显区别,但从发生的不良反应程度来看,培美曲塞比多西他赛的不良反应程度较轻,建议临床上推荐使用。
目的:探討培美麯塞與多西他賽治療晚期非小細胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的臨床療效及不良反應。方法選取2010年5月至2013年7月期間我院腫瘤科收治的晚期NSCLC患者86例。隨機分為兩組各43例,培美麯塞組患者給予培美麯塞二鈉500 mg/m2,靜脈滴註10 min;多西他賽組患者給予多西他賽75 mg/m2,靜脈滴註1 h,21 d為1箇療程,兩組均治療兩箇療程,評價兩組患者的近期療效和不良反應髮生率。結果兩組治療NSCLC晚期患者的控製率與有效率方麵比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05),同時在腺癌、鱗癌、大細胞癌的控製率與有效率方麵比較,兩組的差異也均無統計學意義(P>0.05);兩組總的毒副反應髮生率比較雖然差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),但在胃腸道反應、骨髓抑製、肝毒性等不良反應的嚴重程度髮生率方麵比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論培美麯塞與多西他賽治療NSCLC晚期患者的近期療效無明顯區彆,但從髮生的不良反應程度來看,培美麯塞比多西他賽的不良反應程度較輕,建議臨床上推薦使用。
목적:탐토배미곡새여다서타새치료만기비소세포폐암(NSCLC)환자적림상료효급불량반응。방법선취2010년5월지2013년7월기간아원종류과수치적만기NSCLC환자86례。수궤분위량조각43례,배미곡새조환자급여배미곡새이납500 mg/m2,정맥적주10 min;다서타새조환자급여다서타새75 mg/m2,정맥적주1 h,21 d위1개료정,량조균치료량개료정,평개량조환자적근기료효화불량반응발생솔。결과량조치료NSCLC만기환자적공제솔여유효솔방면비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05),동시재선암、린암、대세포암적공제솔여유효솔방면비교,량조적차이야균무통계학의의(P>0.05);량조총적독부반응발생솔비교수연차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단재위장도반응、골수억제、간독성등불량반응적엄중정도발생솔방면비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론배미곡새여다서타새치료NSCLC만기환자적근기료효무명현구별,단종발생적불량반응정도래간,배미곡새비다서타새적불량반응정도교경,건의림상상추천사용。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and adverse reaction of pemetrexed and docetaxel in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Eighty-six patients of advanced non-small cell lung cancer Department of Oncology in our hospital from May 2010 to July 2013 were selected, which were randomly divid-ed into two groups, each of 43 cases. The pemetrexed group was treated with pemetrexed disodium 500 mg/m2, IV drip 10 min;the docetaxel group was treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2, IV drip 1 h, 21 d for one course of treatment, for 2 courses. The short-term effect and the incidence of adverse reactions were evaluated. Results The two groups showed no significant differences in the control rate and effective rate of NSCLC (P>0.05), and also in that of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma (P>0.05). The two groups showed no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions (P>0.05), but showed statistically significant in the severity of adverse gastro-intestinal reactions, bone marrow suppression, hepatic toxicity (P<0.05). Conclusion There is no significant differ-ence in the efficacy of pemetrexed and docetaxel for the treatment of advacced NSCLC patients. However, pemetrexed results in lighter adverse reactions than docetaxel, which is worth to be recommended for clinical use.