海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
21期
3138-3140
,共3页
符起亚%张黎%段莉%郑旭%钱士匀%吴玲%巫翠萍%庞红霞
符起亞%張黎%段莉%鄭旭%錢士勻%吳玲%巫翠萍%龐紅霞
부기아%장려%단리%정욱%전사균%오령%무취평%방홍하
慢性牙周炎%龈沟液(GCF)%T细胞亚群%免疫功能
慢性牙週炎%齦溝液(GCF)%T細胞亞群%免疫功能
만성아주염%간구액(GCF)%T세포아군%면역공능
Chronic periodontitis%Gingival crevicular fluid%T cell subsets%Immune function
目的:探讨慢性牙周炎患者治疗前后龈沟液(GCF)中T细胞亚群中CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+的改变及其临床意义。方法选取我院进行治疗的48例慢性牙周炎患者为治疗组,全部常规治疗,正常健康对照组32例,检测治疗组治疗前、治疗后6、12、24周的临床指数,采用流式细胞术检测治疗组治疗前后及正常对照组GCF中CD3+、CD4+、CD8+的所占比例及计算CD4+/CD8+的值,并分析二者的相关性。结果慢性牙周炎通过常规治疗后,牙周临床指标包括PD、CAL、PI和PLI均有明显改善(P<0.01或P<0.05);治疗组GCF中CD3+、CD4+、CD8+和CD4+/CD8+在治疗前和治疗后的6周、12周与对照组的相应时间点比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);治疗前水平与治疗后6周、12周和24周比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);治疗前后PD、PI和PLI与GCF中T细胞亚群的水平有明显相关性(P<0.01或P<0.05)。结论 T淋巴细胞亚群的变化与慢性牙周炎的炎症状态密切相关,可作为一项评估预后的指标。
目的:探討慢性牙週炎患者治療前後齦溝液(GCF)中T細胞亞群中CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+的改變及其臨床意義。方法選取我院進行治療的48例慢性牙週炎患者為治療組,全部常規治療,正常健康對照組32例,檢測治療組治療前、治療後6、12、24週的臨床指數,採用流式細胞術檢測治療組治療前後及正常對照組GCF中CD3+、CD4+、CD8+的所佔比例及計算CD4+/CD8+的值,併分析二者的相關性。結果慢性牙週炎通過常規治療後,牙週臨床指標包括PD、CAL、PI和PLI均有明顯改善(P<0.01或P<0.05);治療組GCF中CD3+、CD4+、CD8+和CD4+/CD8+在治療前和治療後的6週、12週與對照組的相應時間點比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);治療前水平與治療後6週、12週和24週比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);治療前後PD、PI和PLI與GCF中T細胞亞群的水平有明顯相關性(P<0.01或P<0.05)。結論 T淋巴細胞亞群的變化與慢性牙週炎的炎癥狀態密切相關,可作為一項評估預後的指標。
목적:탐토만성아주염환자치료전후간구액(GCF)중T세포아군중CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+적개변급기림상의의。방법선취아원진행치료적48례만성아주염환자위치료조,전부상규치료,정상건강대조조32례,검측치료조치료전、치료후6、12、24주적림상지수,채용류식세포술검측치료조치료전후급정상대조조GCF중CD3+、CD4+、CD8+적소점비례급계산CD4+/CD8+적치,병분석이자적상관성。결과만성아주염통과상규치료후,아주림상지표포괄PD、CAL、PI화PLI균유명현개선(P<0.01혹P<0.05);치료조GCF중CD3+、CD4+、CD8+화CD4+/CD8+재치료전화치료후적6주、12주여대조조적상응시간점비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);치료전수평여치료후6주、12주화24주비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);치료전후PD、PI화PLI여GCF중T세포아군적수평유명현상관성(P<0.01혹P<0.05)。결론 T림파세포아군적변화여만성아주염적염증상태밀절상관,가작위일항평고예후적지표。
Objective To investigate the changes in levels of T cell subsets CD3+, CD4+, CD8+and CD4+/CD8+in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) in chronic periodontitis patients before and after treatment and their clinical signifi-cance. Methods The treatment group included 48 patients with chronic periodontitis who were given conventional periodontal treatment, while the control group enrolled 32 periodontally healthy individuals. Clinical parameters were collected at baseline and 6, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment, along with GCF CD3+, CD4+, CD8+levels and CD4+/CD8+ratios, which was measured using flow cytometry. The correlation between clinical parameters and T cell subset levels was analyzed. Results Significant improvement of clinical parameters in chronic periodontitis patients was observed following conventional treatment (P<0.01 or P<0.05). There were statistical differences between the treatment and control groups in CD3+, CD4+, CD8+and CD4+/CD8+levels at baseline, and 6 and 12 weeks after treatment (P<0.01). There were statistical differences between baseline levels and levels at 6, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment (P<0.01). The correlation between clinical parameters, including PD, PI and PLI, and GCF T cell subset levels before and after treatment, was statistically significant (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Conclusion GCF T cell subset levels are closely associated with the clinical inflammatory status of chronic periodontitis and may be used as markers for evaluation of prognosis.