CAJ | 학술논문

针对目前各图书馆的核心期刊评价不能准确反映读者对期刊的实际需求与馆藏期刊实际利用情况的问题，及不同署名位次的作者对文后参考文献的利用程度不同，提出了基于期刊加权被引次数的馆藏期刊评价方法，并以第二军医大学作者引用较多的风湿病学西文期刊为例进行期刊评价，结果证明利用该方法进行期刊评价要优于基于引文分析的传统期刊评价方法。
침대목전각도서관적핵심기간평개불능준학반영독자대기간적실제수구여관장기간실제이용정황적문제，급불동서명위차적작자대문후삼고문헌적이용정도불동，제출료기우기간가권피인차수적관장기간평개방법，병이제이군의대학작자인용교다적풍습병학서문기간위례진행기간평개，결과증명이용해방법진행기간평개요우우기우인문분석적전통기간평개방법。
A method to assess library-holding journals according to their weighted citations was proposed in light of the actual needs of users for core journals, the use of library-holding journals and references by authors in different orders of precedence.The Western journal of rheumatology, highly cited by authors of Second Military Medical U-niversity, were assessed using this method, showing that this method is better than the citation analysis-based tra-ditional method in assessment of journals.