宜宾学院学报
宜賓學院學報
의빈학원학보
JOURNAL OF YIBIN UNIVERSITY
2014年
10期
10-14
,共5页
唐君毅%牟宗三%罗近溪%阳明学%圆教
唐君毅%牟宗三%囉近溪%暘明學%圓教
당군의%모종삼%라근계%양명학%원교
Tang Junyi%Mu Zongsan%Luo Jinxi%Yangming theory%Yuanjiao
罗近溪作为明代泰州一脉代表人物,与王龙溪并称为“二溪”,其学以阳明学为根基,为王门正宗。唐君毅、牟宗三对近溪之评价略有差别:牟先生从本体论评断近溪学之地位,前期对其推崇极高,认为是最圆融之王学之境界,后期则将近溪之特色收缩为功夫实践上的表现,故仅置于泰州门下为一大家。唐先生的评价则从工夫论入手,认为近溪之工夫论之特出之处,既能显良知良能之平常日用之自然,又能不放失而谨守敬畏之意,仁智合一,语义圆足,其评价前后一贯,甚至后期更为推崇。然近溪固然有进于龙溪四无说之只立先天正心之学,工夫上却只较龙溪更细密而切近。近溪重心体之明与智,实仍偏向阳明之心学,与伊川朱子持敬之论实有距离。
囉近溪作為明代泰州一脈代錶人物,與王龍溪併稱為“二溪”,其學以暘明學為根基,為王門正宗。唐君毅、牟宗三對近溪之評價略有差彆:牟先生從本體論評斷近溪學之地位,前期對其推崇極高,認為是最圓融之王學之境界,後期則將近溪之特色收縮為功伕實踐上的錶現,故僅置于泰州門下為一大傢。唐先生的評價則從工伕論入手,認為近溪之工伕論之特齣之處,既能顯良知良能之平常日用之自然,又能不放失而謹守敬畏之意,仁智閤一,語義圓足,其評價前後一貫,甚至後期更為推崇。然近溪固然有進于龍溪四無說之隻立先天正心之學,工伕上卻隻較龍溪更細密而切近。近溪重心體之明與智,實仍偏嚮暘明之心學,與伊川硃子持敬之論實有距離。
라근계작위명대태주일맥대표인물,여왕룡계병칭위“이계”,기학이양명학위근기,위왕문정종。당군의、모종삼대근계지평개략유차별:모선생종본체론평단근계학지지위,전기대기추숭겁고,인위시최원융지왕학지경계,후기칙장근계지특색수축위공부실천상적표현,고부치우태주문하위일대가。당선생적평개칙종공부론입수,인위근계지공부론지특출지처,기능현량지량능지평상일용지자연,우능불방실이근수경외지의,인지합일,어의원족,기평개전후일관,심지후기경위추숭。연근계고연유진우룡계사무설지지립선천정심지학,공부상각지교룡계경세밀이절근。근계중심체지명여지,실잉편향양명지심학,여이천주자지경지론실유거리。
Luo Jinxi was the representative figure of the Taizhou branch of philosophy in Ming Dynasty.Equally famous as Wang Longxi, Luo’ s philosophy took its root in Yangming theory and was regarded as the orthodox branch of the Wang school.There were several differences between Tang Junyi and Mu Zongsan’ s view of Jinxi:judging from the perspective of ontology, Mr Mu thought highly of Jinxi’ s theory at his early days, viewing it as the most harmonious state of the Wang school of philosophy, while at his latter days, his appreciation for Luo a-bated to only valuing his performance in the practice of Gongfu, thus categorizing it under the Taizhou branch;Tang’ s opinion of Luo’ s theory focused on the cultivation theory, which remained constant, with a growing trend of appreciation.In his view, Jinxi’ s cultivation theory was prominent in that it showed an perfect integration of benevolence and intelligence, promoting in a mild way the fine qualities in daily life on the one hand, and with-out being so undisciplined as to indulge the violation of the established rules on the other hand.Jinxi’ s theory, though in want of consummation in theory of cultivating one’ s moral character compared with Longxi’ s theory of“four voidness”, was more meticulous and adaptable in the theory of cultivation.Thus it born a similar nature with the Yangming theory instead of Yichuan and Zhuzi’ s theory of“Chijin”.