中国环境科学
中國環境科學
중국배경과학
CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
2014年
11期
2985-2992
,共8页
高玉冰%毛显强%Gabriel Corsetti%魏毅
高玉冰%毛顯彊%Gabriel Corsetti%魏毅
고옥빙%모현강%Gabriel Corsetti%위의
乌鲁木齐%城市交通%协同控制
烏魯木齊%城市交通%協同控製
오로목제%성시교통%협동공제
Urumqi%urban transport%co-control
针对乌鲁木齐城市交通领域12项减排措施开展协同控制效应评估,构建空气污染物与温室气体协同减排当量(APeq)指标进行减排效果归一化,识别措施是否具有协同减排效果,并进一步计算单位 APeq减排成本,从成本有效性角度对各项减排措施进行排序。研究结果表明,出租车、私家车油改气以及纯电动轿车替代汽油轿车3项措施不具有协同控制效应;而提高尾气排放标准、天然气公交替代柴油公交、提升小客车燃油经济性、油品升级、淘汰黄标车、发展轨道交通、引入快速公交等措施可以实现局地大气污染物与温室气体的协同减排。费用-效果分析表明,提高小客车燃油经济性的单位APeq减排成本最低,具有良好的成本有效性;而发展轨道交通虽然单位APeq减排成本较高,但总体减排效果较好。
針對烏魯木齊城市交通領域12項減排措施開展協同控製效應評估,構建空氣汙染物與溫室氣體協同減排噹量(APeq)指標進行減排效果歸一化,識彆措施是否具有協同減排效果,併進一步計算單位 APeq減排成本,從成本有效性角度對各項減排措施進行排序。研究結果錶明,齣租車、私傢車油改氣以及純電動轎車替代汽油轎車3項措施不具有協同控製效應;而提高尾氣排放標準、天然氣公交替代柴油公交、提升小客車燃油經濟性、油品升級、淘汰黃標車、髮展軌道交通、引入快速公交等措施可以實現跼地大氣汙染物與溫室氣體的協同減排。費用-效果分析錶明,提高小客車燃油經濟性的單位APeq減排成本最低,具有良好的成本有效性;而髮展軌道交通雖然單位APeq減排成本較高,但總體減排效果較好。
침대오로목제성시교통영역12항감배조시개전협동공제효응평고,구건공기오염물여온실기체협동감배당량(APeq)지표진행감배효과귀일화,식별조시시부구유협동감배효과,병진일보계산단위 APeq감배성본,종성본유효성각도대각항감배조시진행배서。연구결과표명,출조차、사가차유개기이급순전동교차체대기유교차3항조시불구유협동공제효응;이제고미기배방표준、천연기공교체대시유공교、제승소객차연유경제성、유품승급、도태황표차、발전궤도교통、인입쾌속공교등조시가이실현국지대기오염물여온실기체적협동감배。비용-효과분석표명,제고소객차연유경제성적단위APeq감배성본최저,구유량호적성본유효성;이발전궤도교통수연단위APeq감배성본교고,단총체감배효과교호。
In this study, the co-control effects of 12 typical emission reduction measures used in Urumqi urban transport system were analyzed. An Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gas Equivalence index (APeq) was built to normalize the effects of the emission reduction of the different pollutants. The unit pollutant or greenhouse gas reduction cost (UPRC) was then calculated to rank these measures according to their cost-effectiveness. The results showed that gasoline-to-CNG retrofit program of taxis and personal vehicles and the application of electric cars were unable to achieve co-reduction. On the other hand, improving exhaust emission standards, application of natural gas buses, improving fuel efficiency of passenger cars, upgrading fuel quality, phasing out heavy-polluting vehicles, rail transit and bus rapid transit could simultaneously reduce local air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. The economic analysis indicated that improving the fuel efficiency of passenger cars was the most cost-effective strategy, while rail transit was more expensive than other measures but had promising emission reduction effects.