重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)
重慶郵電大學學報(社會科學版)
중경유전대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF CHONGQING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
6期
38-44
,共7页
近似商标%识别性%“渝富桥”
近似商標%識彆性%“渝富橋”
근사상표%식별성%“투부교”
similar trademark%identity%“Yu Fu Qiao”
“渝富桥”商标异议案中五个程序的认定结果依次相反,这反映了《商标法》(2013)修改前近似商标注册审查实务中存在着严重的分歧。这种分歧源于原来的《商标法》对近似商标界定不明确,实践中对近似商标的内涵及其与准予注册之间的逻辑关系认识不一致。以体系解释的方法来理解《商标法》(2013)第30条,近似商标申请注册审查标准是一个多层级递进式的逻辑结构:第一步,对申请注册商标构成近似商标的层进式审查:一是审查申请注册商标与引证商标的标志是否构成近似;二是审查申请注册商标是否完全具备商品关联性、空间和时间重合性三要件;三是判定申请注册商标是否属于近似商标。第二步,对属于近似商标的申请注册商标,进一步作是否符合注册标准的层进式审查:一是审查申请注册商标是否容易导致与引证商标的混淆;二是审查有无阻却违法的事由;三是商标局决定是否准予初步审定公告或注册。
“渝富橋”商標異議案中五箇程序的認定結果依次相反,這反映瞭《商標法》(2013)脩改前近似商標註冊審查實務中存在著嚴重的分歧。這種分歧源于原來的《商標法》對近似商標界定不明確,實踐中對近似商標的內涵及其與準予註冊之間的邏輯關繫認識不一緻。以體繫解釋的方法來理解《商標法》(2013)第30條,近似商標申請註冊審查標準是一箇多層級遞進式的邏輯結構:第一步,對申請註冊商標構成近似商標的層進式審查:一是審查申請註冊商標與引證商標的標誌是否構成近似;二是審查申請註冊商標是否完全具備商品關聯性、空間和時間重閤性三要件;三是判定申請註冊商標是否屬于近似商標。第二步,對屬于近似商標的申請註冊商標,進一步作是否符閤註冊標準的層進式審查:一是審查申請註冊商標是否容易導緻與引證商標的混淆;二是審查有無阻卻違法的事由;三是商標跼決定是否準予初步審定公告或註冊。
“투부교”상표이의안중오개정서적인정결과의차상반,저반영료《상표법》(2013)수개전근사상표주책심사실무중존재착엄중적분기。저충분기원우원래적《상표법》대근사상표계정불명학,실천중대근사상표적내함급기여준여주책지간적라집관계인식불일치。이체계해석적방법래리해《상표법》(2013)제30조,근사상표신청주책심사표준시일개다층급체진식적라집결구:제일보,대신청주책상표구성근사상표적층진식심사:일시심사신청주책상표여인증상표적표지시부구성근사;이시심사신청주책상표시부완전구비상품관련성、공간화시간중합성삼요건;삼시판정신청주책상표시부속우근사상표。제이보,대속우근사상표적신청주책상표,진일보작시부부합주책표준적층진식심사:일시심사신청주책상표시부용역도치여인증상표적혼효;이시심사유무조각위법적사유;삼시상표국결정시부준여초보심정공고혹주책。
The different results of five procedures of “Yu Fu Qiao”trademark opposition case reflect the serious differ-ences in the practice of Registration and Examination of similar trademark before the modification of the Trademark Law (2013).This divergence comes from the different understanding of logical relation between the similar trademark and the approval of registration.The meaning of the article 30 of the trademark law (2013)with the system interpretation method is:the registration and examination standard of similar trademark is a multi and progressive logical structure.The first step,the progressive examination for whether the trademark applying for the registration constitutes the similar trade-mark:first,whether the disputed trademark and the cited trademark are similar;second,whether the disputed trademark constitutes a similar trademark with the requirement of the association and the coincidence of space and time;third, whether the trademark applying for the registration constitutes the similar trademark.The second step,the progressive ex-amination for whether the trademark applying for the registration conforms to the registration standard:first,whether the disputed trademark easily leads to the confusion of the cited trademark;second,whether the disputed trademark is ille-gal;third,whether the Trademark Office decides to approve the registration.