生态环境学报
生態環境學報
생태배경학보
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
2014年
9期
1438-1444
,共7页
南淑清%张霖琳%张丹%梁晶%多可辛%张军%王玲玲
南淑清%張霖琳%張丹%樑晶%多可辛%張軍%王玲玲
남숙청%장림림%장단%량정%다가신%장군%왕령령
挥发性有机物%污染特征%健康风险评价
揮髮性有機物%汙染特徵%健康風險評價
휘발성유궤물%오염특정%건강풍험평개
volatile organic compounds%pollution characteristic%health risk assessment
挥发性有机物(VOCs)不但是引发霾和光化学烟雾等环境问题的重要原因,达到一定浓度时还对人类健康造成威胁。为研究中原地区环境空气中VOCs污染状况,探查VOCs对人群健康产生的风险,以中原地区核心城市-郑州为代表,于2012年─2013年间,在郑州市区内布点,以苏玛罐采样/气相色谱-质谱法分析测定了VOCs的时空分布,并使用健康风险评价四步法进行健康风险评价。郑州市环境空气中VOCs年均浓度分布特征:以烷烃和芳香烃为主,分别占总量的23.8%和19.5%;年平均质量浓度,芳香烃类为131μg·m-3、烷烃类为118μg·m-3,酮类为84.3μg·m-3、卤代烷烃类为67.8μg·m-3;单体化合物以丙酮(66.2μg·m-3)、乙醇(27.5μ·m-3)、正十一烷(24.4μg·m-3)和甲苯(17.2μg·m-3)质量浓度最高,污染程度在国内居于中等水平。VOCs季均浓度分布特征:夏季高于冬季,但各类化合物在两季的浓度差异较大。VOCs日均浓度变化特征:烷烃类和芳烃类化合物于10:00出现浓度峰值,浓度变化趋势与交通量变化具有相关性。健康风险评价结果为:非致癌风险大于1,会对人群健康造成一定的非致癌危害;苯、四氯化碳、1,2-二氯乙烷、1,1,2-三氯乙烷、六氯丁二烯的致癌指数超过EPA致癌风险值,但未超出OSHA致癌风险。
揮髮性有機物(VOCs)不但是引髮霾和光化學煙霧等環境問題的重要原因,達到一定濃度時還對人類健康造成威脅。為研究中原地區環境空氣中VOCs汙染狀況,探查VOCs對人群健康產生的風險,以中原地區覈心城市-鄭州為代錶,于2012年─2013年間,在鄭州市區內佈點,以囌瑪罐採樣/氣相色譜-質譜法分析測定瞭VOCs的時空分佈,併使用健康風險評價四步法進行健康風險評價。鄭州市環境空氣中VOCs年均濃度分佈特徵:以烷烴和芳香烴為主,分彆佔總量的23.8%和19.5%;年平均質量濃度,芳香烴類為131μg·m-3、烷烴類為118μg·m-3,酮類為84.3μg·m-3、滷代烷烴類為67.8μg·m-3;單體化閤物以丙酮(66.2μg·m-3)、乙醇(27.5μ·m-3)、正十一烷(24.4μg·m-3)和甲苯(17.2μg·m-3)質量濃度最高,汙染程度在國內居于中等水平。VOCs季均濃度分佈特徵:夏季高于鼕季,但各類化閤物在兩季的濃度差異較大。VOCs日均濃度變化特徵:烷烴類和芳烴類化閤物于10:00齣現濃度峰值,濃度變化趨勢與交通量變化具有相關性。健康風險評價結果為:非緻癌風險大于1,會對人群健康造成一定的非緻癌危害;苯、四氯化碳、1,2-二氯乙烷、1,1,2-三氯乙烷、六氯丁二烯的緻癌指數超過EPA緻癌風險值,但未超齣OSHA緻癌風險。
휘발성유궤물(VOCs)불단시인발매화광화학연무등배경문제적중요원인,체도일정농도시환대인류건강조성위협。위연구중원지구배경공기중VOCs오염상황,탐사VOCs대인군건강산생적풍험,이중원지구핵심성시-정주위대표,우2012년─2013년간,재정주시구내포점,이소마관채양/기상색보-질보법분석측정료VOCs적시공분포,병사용건강풍험평개사보법진행건강풍험평개。정주시배경공기중VOCs년균농도분포특정:이완경화방향경위주,분별점총량적23.8%화19.5%;년평균질량농도,방향경류위131μg·m-3、완경류위118μg·m-3,동류위84.3μg·m-3、서대완경류위67.8μg·m-3;단체화합물이병동(66.2μg·m-3)、을순(27.5μ·m-3)、정십일완(24.4μg·m-3)화갑분(17.2μg·m-3)질량농도최고,오염정도재국내거우중등수평。VOCs계균농도분포특정:하계고우동계,단각류화합물재량계적농도차이교대。VOCs일균농도변화특정:완경류화방경류화합물우10:00출현농도봉치,농도변화추세여교통량변화구유상관성。건강풍험평개결과위:비치암풍험대우1,회대인군건강조성일정적비치암위해;분、사록화탄、1,2-이록을완、1,1,2-삼록을완、륙록정이희적치암지수초과EPA치암풍험치,단미초출OSHA치암풍험。
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) could cause not only environmental problems such as haze and photochemical smog, but also some threats to human health in a certain concentration. To study the VOCs concentration and the risk of health effects from VOCs , the temporal and spatial distribution of VOCs were determined by GC/MS with Canister sampling during the period of 2012─2013 in Zhengzhou.The four-step evaluation model of health risk assessment (HRA) which was recognized internationally was adopted to preliminarily assess the health risks caused by VOCs. The results showed that alkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons were the main compositions of VOCs in ambient air in Zhengzhou and the proportion were 23.8% and 19.5%respectively. The annual average concentration of aromatic hydrocarbons was 131 μg·m-3, the annual average concentration of alkanes was 118 μg·m-3, and the annual average concentration of ketones was 84.3 μg·m-3. The highest annual concentration compounds were acetone (66.2μg·m-3), alcohol (27.5μg·m-3), undecane (24.4μg·m-3) and toluene (17.2μg·m-3). The pollution was middle level in China. The concentration of VOCs in summer was higher than in winter. But the difference of the concentrations of various types of compounds between two seasons was large. The highest daily concentrations of alkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons appeared at am 10:00 which was correlated with traffic flow. The results of HRA indicated that non-carcinogenic risk indexes of VOCs were higher than 1. Volatile pollutants would cause non-carcinogenic health hazard to exposed population.The cancer risk index exposed to benzene, carbon tetrachloride, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,1,2-trichloroethane and hexachlorobutadiene was higher than the suggested value of USEPA which was not higher than OSHA. It indicated that the exposure might cause potential harm to human health.