山东医药
山東醫藥
산동의약
SHANDONG MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
44期
34-36
,共3页
李楠%刘波%何达%行勇刚%张贵林%田伟
李楠%劉波%何達%行勇剛%張貴林%田偉
리남%류파%하체%행용강%장귀림%전위
颈椎病%颈椎前路间盘切除内固定术%氧化再生纤维素%可吸收明胶海绵%止血材料
頸椎病%頸椎前路間盤切除內固定術%氧化再生纖維素%可吸收明膠海綿%止血材料
경추병%경추전로간반절제내고정술%양화재생섬유소%가흡수명효해면%지혈재료
cervical spondylosis%anterior cervical discectomy and fusion%oxidated regenerated cellulose%absorbable gelatin sponge%hemostatic material
目的:比较氧化再生纤维素(ORC)和可吸收明胶海绵(AGS)在颈椎前路间盘切除融合(ACDF)术中的止血效果。方法 ACDF手术患者356例,术中191例( ORC组)使用ORC止血,165例( AGS组)使用AGS止血。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量和术后引流量。结果 ORC组和AGS组的手术时间分别为(81.5±9.9)、(88.6±10.8)min,P=0.062;术中出血量分别为(55.3±11.2)、(69.4±13.2) mL,P=0.034;术后引流量分别为(35.5±13.5)、(51.2±16.8)mL,P=0.029。 AGS组因术后出现颈部急性血肿接受探查术1例。结论 ORC相比AGS可以减少ACDF术中出血量和术后引流量,提高手术安全性。
目的:比較氧化再生纖維素(ORC)和可吸收明膠海綿(AGS)在頸椎前路間盤切除融閤(ACDF)術中的止血效果。方法 ACDF手術患者356例,術中191例( ORC組)使用ORC止血,165例( AGS組)使用AGS止血。比較兩組手術時間、術中齣血量和術後引流量。結果 ORC組和AGS組的手術時間分彆為(81.5±9.9)、(88.6±10.8)min,P=0.062;術中齣血量分彆為(55.3±11.2)、(69.4±13.2) mL,P=0.034;術後引流量分彆為(35.5±13.5)、(51.2±16.8)mL,P=0.029。 AGS組因術後齣現頸部急性血腫接受探查術1例。結論 ORC相比AGS可以減少ACDF術中齣血量和術後引流量,提高手術安全性。
목적:비교양화재생섬유소(ORC)화가흡수명효해면(AGS)재경추전로간반절제융합(ACDF)술중적지혈효과。방법 ACDF수술환자356례,술중191례( ORC조)사용ORC지혈,165례( AGS조)사용AGS지혈。비교량조수술시간、술중출혈량화술후인류량。결과 ORC조화AGS조적수술시간분별위(81.5±9.9)、(88.6±10.8)min,P=0.062;술중출혈량분별위(55.3±11.2)、(69.4±13.2) mL,P=0.034;술후인류량분별위(35.5±13.5)、(51.2±16.8)mL,P=0.029。 AGS조인술후출현경부급성혈종접수탐사술1례。결론 ORC상비AGS가이감소ACDF술중출혈량화술후인류량,제고수술안전성。
Objective To compare the hemostatic effect between oxidated regenerated cellulose ( ORC) and absorba-ble gelatin sponge ( AGS) during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedure ( ACDF) .Methods 356 patients un-derwent the ACDF procedure were divided into ORC group (191 patients) and AGS group (165 patients).The operative duration, the volume of blood loss and the volume of drainage between two groups were compared.Results The average operative duration in ORC and AGS groups was (81.5 ±9.9) min and (88.6 ±10.8) min (P=0.062).The average op-erative blood loss in ORC and AGS groups was (55.3 ±11.2) mL and (69.4 ±13.2) mL (P=0.034).The average post-operative drainage in ORC and AGS groups was (35.5 ±13.5) mL and (51.2 ±16.8) mL (P=0.029).One pa-tient in AGS group underwent exploration due to acute neck hematoma post-operatively.Conclusion Compared with AGS, ORC can obviously decrease the operative blood loss and drainage, increase the safety of operation.