CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较应用微创技术与传统凿骨劈冠法拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床效果。方法：选择需双侧下颌阻生智齿拔除的患者91例，同一患者双侧分别随机采取微创技术或传统凿骨劈冠法拔除阻生智齿，比较两组的拔牙时间、术中患者的主观感觉及术后水肿和痛疼情况，按两样本t检验和X2检验行统计分析。结果：与传统拔牙方法相比，微创拔牙技术拔牙时间更短（P＜0．05），术后疼痛及水肿反应较轻（P＜0．05），患者更愿意接受。结论：与传统凿骨劈冠法拔除下颌阻生智齿相比，微创拔牙技术效率更高，术后反应更轻，患者更愿意接受。
목적：비교응용미창기술여전통착골벽관법발제하합조생지치적림상효과。방법：선택수쌍측하합조생지치발제적환자91례，동일환자쌍측분별수궤채취미창기술혹전통착골벽관법발제조생지치，비교량조적발아시간、술중환자적주관감각급술후수종화통동정황，안량양본t검험화X2검험행통계분석。결과：여전통발아방법상비，미창발아기술발아시간경단（P＜0．05），술후동통급수종반응교경（P＜0．05），환자경원의접수。결론：여전통착골벽관법발제하합조생지치상비，미창발아기술효솔경고，술후반응경경，환자경원의접수。
Objective:To compare the effect of extraction of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth with the minimally in-vasive technology and traditional method. Method:91 chosen patients had both sides of impacted third molars extracted in this study. Patients were given extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth with either minimally invasive technology or the traditional method randomly at each side. The operation time,postoperative complications were recorded and evaluated statistically by means of t-test and Chi-squared test to assess the effects of the methods. Result:Using minimally invasive technology,the extraction time is shorter(P <0.05),postoperative pain and edema reaction is lighter(P <0.05). Conclusion:Minimally invasive extraction technology with higher efficiency,lighter postoperative reaction, can be used as conventional methods of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth extraction.