临床口腔医学杂志
臨床口腔醫學雜誌
림상구강의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL STOMATOLOGY
2014年
11期
674-676
,共3页
黄兰柱%王铁梅%黄政%盛璐%刘澍
黃蘭柱%王鐵梅%黃政%盛璐%劉澍
황란주%왕철매%황정%성로%류주
CBCT%曲面体层摄影%阻生牙%下颌神经管
CBCT%麯麵體層攝影%阻生牙%下頜神經管
CBCT%곡면체층섭영%조생아%하합신경관
cone beam CT%panoramic radiographs%impacted mandibular third molar%inferior alveolar canal
目的:运用CBCT评估下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中下牙槽神经损伤的手术风险,并指导拔牙手术径路选择。方法:对曲面体层片显示下颌第三磨牙根端与下颌神经管接触重叠,评估下牙槽神经易损伤病例42例,65侧下颌阻生第三磨牙,进行CBCT检查。两组医师(每组口腔外科医师和颌面影像科医师各1名)分别根据曲面体层片和CBCT图像评估拔除下颌第三磨牙时下牙槽神经损伤的风险程度并进行手术设计,应用x2检验两种影像评测结果之间的差异度。结果:评估拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙时出现下牙槽神经损伤的可能性经曲面体层片和CBCT对比研究差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。与曲面体层片相比,CBCT为临床医师提供了阻生磨牙与下颌神经管之间三维影像的空间距离,有效辅助了牙拔除手术方式的设计(P<0.001)。结论:拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙可能造成下牙槽神经损伤的评估中,与曲面体层片相比,CBCT可以更好地评估手术风险,能指导术者帮助选择更恰当的术式。
目的:運用CBCT評估下頜阻生第三磨牙拔除術中下牙槽神經損傷的手術風險,併指導拔牙手術徑路選擇。方法:對麯麵體層片顯示下頜第三磨牙根耑與下頜神經管接觸重疊,評估下牙槽神經易損傷病例42例,65側下頜阻生第三磨牙,進行CBCT檢查。兩組醫師(每組口腔外科醫師和頜麵影像科醫師各1名)分彆根據麯麵體層片和CBCT圖像評估拔除下頜第三磨牙時下牙槽神經損傷的風險程度併進行手術設計,應用x2檢驗兩種影像評測結果之間的差異度。結果:評估拔除下頜阻生第三磨牙時齣現下牙槽神經損傷的可能性經麯麵體層片和CBCT對比研究差異具有統計學意義(P<0.001)。與麯麵體層片相比,CBCT為臨床醫師提供瞭阻生磨牙與下頜神經管之間三維影像的空間距離,有效輔助瞭牙拔除手術方式的設計(P<0.001)。結論:拔除下頜阻生第三磨牙可能造成下牙槽神經損傷的評估中,與麯麵體層片相比,CBCT可以更好地評估手術風險,能指導術者幫助選擇更恰噹的術式。
목적:운용CBCT평고하합조생제삼마아발제술중하아조신경손상적수술풍험,병지도발아수술경로선택。방법:대곡면체층편현시하합제삼마아근단여하합신경관접촉중첩,평고하아조신경역손상병례42례,65측하합조생제삼마아,진행CBCT검사。량조의사(매조구강외과의사화합면영상과의사각1명)분별근거곡면체층편화CBCT도상평고발제하합제삼마아시하아조신경손상적풍험정도병진행수술설계,응용x2검험량충영상평측결과지간적차이도。결과:평고발제하합조생제삼마아시출현하아조신경손상적가능성경곡면체층편화CBCT대비연구차이구유통계학의의(P<0.001)。여곡면체층편상비,CBCT위림상의사제공료조생마아여하합신경관지간삼유영상적공간거리,유효보조료아발제수술방식적설계(P<0.001)。결론:발제하합조생제삼마아가능조성하아조신경손상적평고중,여곡면체층편상비,CBCT가이경호지평고수술풍험,능지도술자방조선택경흡당적술식。
Objective:To investigate the risks of inferior alveolar nerve(IAN) injury by removing impacted mandibular third molar,and difference of the surgical techniques by cone beam CT(CBCT). Method:Subjects with an increased risk of IAN injury,as diagnosed on panoramic radiographs,were enrolled in this study and underwent additional CBCT imaging. Two groups of doctors(each group contains a oralmaxillofacial surgeon and a radiologist) independently planned the surgical tech-nique and estimated the risk of IAN injury on panoramic radiographs and on CBCT images.A test of Chi-square test was exe-cuted to calculate the differences between the two imaging modalities. Result:The study sample comprised 42 patients(mean age 30.5 years) presenting 65 mandibular third molars. Risk assessment for IAN injury based on panoramic radiography compared with CBCT imaging differed significantly (P<0.001). After reviewing the CBCT images,the clinicians get the pre-cise distance and the relative relationship of the mandibular third molar and inferior alveolar canal compared with the panoramic radiograph assessments. This change in risk assessment also resulted in a significantly different surgical approach (P <0.001). Conclusion: This study show that CBCT contributes to optimal risk assessment and,as a consequence,to more adequate surgical planning,compared with panoramic radiography.