中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
27期
25-26
,共2页
韩冰%孙艳秋%张雪芳%吴煜良%张纯%陈昱明
韓冰%孫豔鞦%張雪芳%吳煜良%張純%陳昱明
한빙%손염추%장설방%오욱량%장순%진욱명
鼻咽癌/调强放射疗法%鼻咽癌/同期放化疗法%预后%不良反应
鼻嚥癌/調彊放射療法%鼻嚥癌/同期放化療法%預後%不良反應
비인암/조강방사요법%비인암/동기방화요법%예후%불량반응
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma/intensity modulated radiotherapy%Nasopharyngeal carcinoma/concurrent chemoradiotherapy%Prognosis%Side effects
目的:比较IMRT联合化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌临床疗效和不良反应。方法对2007-2010年间收治的符合入组标准的280例鼻咽癌患者随机均分为实验组和对照组,实验组采用同期放化疗和新辅助化疗方案治疗,对照组采用单纯放疗方案治疗。结果治疗后3年内复发24例(观察组5例,对照组19例);远处转移19例(观察组4例,对照组15例),3年内死亡19例(全为对照组),两组患者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗期间急性不良反应包括皮肤发射损伤及恶心呕吐50例(实验组35例,对照组15例),白细胞减少160例(实验组102例,对照组58例),两组患者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后1年主要不良反应为皮下软组织纤维化68例(实验组32例,对照组36例),放射性脑病8例(实验组3例,对照组5例),两组患者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用同期放化疗及新辅助化疗可显著提高局部晚期鼻咽癌患者的远期生存率,虽然急性不良反应发生率较单纯放疗高,但远期不良反应相近。
目的:比較IMRT聯閤化療治療跼部晚期鼻嚥癌臨床療效和不良反應。方法對2007-2010年間收治的符閤入組標準的280例鼻嚥癌患者隨機均分為實驗組和對照組,實驗組採用同期放化療和新輔助化療方案治療,對照組採用單純放療方案治療。結果治療後3年內複髮24例(觀察組5例,對照組19例);遠處轉移19例(觀察組4例,對照組15例),3年內死亡19例(全為對照組),兩組患者差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);治療期間急性不良反應包括皮膚髮射損傷及噁心嘔吐50例(實驗組35例,對照組15例),白細胞減少160例(實驗組102例,對照組58例),兩組患者差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。治療後1年主要不良反應為皮下軟組織纖維化68例(實驗組32例,對照組36例),放射性腦病8例(實驗組3例,對照組5例),兩組患者差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論採用同期放化療及新輔助化療可顯著提高跼部晚期鼻嚥癌患者的遠期生存率,雖然急性不良反應髮生率較單純放療高,但遠期不良反應相近。
목적:비교IMRT연합화료치료국부만기비인암림상료효화불량반응。방법대2007-2010년간수치적부합입조표준적280례비인암환자수궤균분위실험조화대조조,실험조채용동기방화료화신보조화료방안치료,대조조채용단순방료방안치료。결과치료후3년내복발24례(관찰조5례,대조조19례);원처전이19례(관찰조4례,대조조15례),3년내사망19례(전위대조조),량조환자차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);치료기간급성불량반응포괄피부발사손상급악심구토50례(실험조35례,대조조15례),백세포감소160례(실험조102례,대조조58례),량조환자차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。치료후1년주요불량반응위피하연조직섬유화68례(실험조32례,대조조36례),방사성뇌병8례(실험조3례,대조조5례),량조환자차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론채용동기방화료급신보조화료가현저제고국부만기비인암환자적원기생존솔,수연급성불량반응발생솔교단순방료고,단원기불량반응상근。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical curative effect and adverse reactions of IMRT combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods 280 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who met the inclusion criteriain and admitted from 2007 to 2010 were randomly and equally divided into the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group was treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while the control group was treated with radiation therapy. Results Within 3 years after treatment, there were 24 cases with recurrence (5 cases in the observation group, 19 cases in the control group);19 cases with distant metastasis (4 cases in the observation group, 15 cases in the control group), 19 cases died in these 3 years (all in the control group), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05); the acute adverse reactions during the treatment included 50 cases with radiation injury of skin and nausea and vomiting(35 cases in the experimental group, 15 cases in the control group), 160 cases with leucopenia (102 cases in the experimental group, 58 cases in the control group), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The adverse reactions 1 year after treatment mainly were 68 cases with subcutaneous soft tissue fibrosis (32 cases in the experimental group, 36 cases in the control group), 8 cases with radiation encephalopathy (3 cases in the experimental group, 5 cases in the control group), the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy can significantly improve the long-term survival rate, although the incidence of acute adverse reactions of which is higher than that of radiotherapy alone, the long-term adverse reactions of the two treatment methods are similar.