CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对粘连性肠梗阻治疗中，腹腔镜手术和开腹手术的临床应用效果进行对比分析。方法在该院2013年6月-2014年6月实施治疗的粘连性肠梗阻患者中随机选取100例，分两组，对照组患者实施开腹手术，观察组患者实施腹腔镜手术，对比分析临床疗效。结果经过对比，和对照组相比，观察组患者的切口长度、手术时间、术后排气时间、住院时间以及术中出血量均较少，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在粘连性肠梗阻患者临床治疗中，腹腔镜手术效果要优于开腹手术，因此值得对腹腔镜手术推广应用。
목적：대점련성장경조치료중，복강경수술화개복수술적림상응용효과진행대비분석。방법재해원2013년6월-2014년6월실시치료적점련성장경조환자중수궤선취100례，분량조，대조조환자실시개복수술，관찰조환자실시복강경수술，대비분석림상료효。결과경과대비，화대조조상비，관찰조환자적절구장도、수술시간、술후배기시간、주원시간이급술중출혈량균교소，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론재점련성장경조환자림상치료중，복강경수술효과요우우개복수술，인차치득대복강경수술추엄응용。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical application effect between laparoscopic operation and open operation in the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction. Methods 100 cases with adhesive intestinal obstruction treated in our hospital from June 2013 to June 2014 were randomly selected and divided into two groups. Patients in the control group were given open operation, and patients in the observation group were treated by laparoscopic operation. And the clinical efficacies of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results Compared with the control group, the incision length, operation time, postoperative exhaust time, hospitalization time and the amount of bleeding during operation of the observation group were less, the difference between the two gruops was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion For the clinical treatment of patients with adhesive intestinal obstruc-tion, the effect of laparoscopic operation is better than that of open operation, therefore the laparoscopic operation is worthy of pro-motion and application.