中国卫生产业
中國衛生產業
중국위생산업
CHINA HEALTH INDUSTRY
2014年
29期
7-8
,共2页
急性胃肠炎%奥美拉唑钠%临床分析
急性胃腸炎%奧美拉唑鈉%臨床分析
급성위장염%오미랍서납%림상분석
Acute gastroenteritis%Omeprazole sodium%Clinical analysis
目的：对奥美拉唑钠联合左氧氟沙星与西咪替丁联合左氧氟沙星治疗急性胃肠炎的临床效果进行对比分析。方法采用对比治疗分析法，选取从2012年5月-2014年5月在我院肠道门诊治疗的240例急性胃肠炎患者，将其随机平均分为实验组和对照组，各120例，实验组在静脉滴注左氧氟沙星治疗基础上采用奥美拉唑钠静脉滴注，对照组在静脉滴注左氧氟沙星基础上同时采用西咪替丁静脉滴注；分别对两组治疗后的临床疗效进行对比，并观察其产生的不良反应。结果实验组患者治疗2 d后显著有效为115例(95.83%)，有效为4例(3.33%)，无效为1例(0.83%)，对照组患者治疗2 d后显著有效为82例(68.33%)，有效为26例(21.67%)，无效为12例(10.00%)，实验组与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；实验组与对照组共出现不良反应9例，其中实验组3例，对照组6例，在停药或给予对症治疗后其不良反应症状均消失。结论通过临床实践研究，采用奥美拉唑钠治疗急性胃肠炎效果显著，不良反应小，值得在临床中推广应用。
目的：對奧美拉唑鈉聯閤左氧氟沙星與西咪替丁聯閤左氧氟沙星治療急性胃腸炎的臨床效果進行對比分析。方法採用對比治療分析法，選取從2012年5月-2014年5月在我院腸道門診治療的240例急性胃腸炎患者，將其隨機平均分為實驗組和對照組，各120例，實驗組在靜脈滴註左氧氟沙星治療基礎上採用奧美拉唑鈉靜脈滴註，對照組在靜脈滴註左氧氟沙星基礎上同時採用西咪替丁靜脈滴註；分彆對兩組治療後的臨床療效進行對比，併觀察其產生的不良反應。結果實驗組患者治療2 d後顯著有效為115例(95.83%)，有效為4例(3.33%)，無效為1例(0.83%)，對照組患者治療2 d後顯著有效為82例(68.33%)，有效為26例(21.67%)，無效為12例(10.00%)，實驗組與對照組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)；實驗組與對照組共齣現不良反應9例，其中實驗組3例，對照組6例，在停藥或給予對癥治療後其不良反應癥狀均消失。結論通過臨床實踐研究，採用奧美拉唑鈉治療急性胃腸炎效果顯著，不良反應小，值得在臨床中推廣應用。
목적：대오미랍서납연합좌양불사성여서미체정연합좌양불사성치료급성위장염적림상효과진행대비분석。방법채용대비치료분석법，선취종2012년5월-2014년5월재아원장도문진치료적240례급성위장염환자，장기수궤평균분위실험조화대조조，각120례，실험조재정맥적주좌양불사성치료기출상채용오미랍서납정맥적주，대조조재정맥적주좌양불사성기출상동시채용서미체정정맥적주；분별대량조치료후적림상료효진행대비，병관찰기산생적불량반응。결과실험조환자치료2 d후현저유효위115례(95.83%)，유효위4례(3.33%)，무효위1례(0.83%)，대조조환자치료2 d후현저유효위82례(68.33%)，유효위26례(21.67%)，무효위12례(10.00%)，실험조여대조조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)；실험조여대조조공출현불량반응9례，기중실험조3례，대조조6례，재정약혹급여대증치료후기불량반응증상균소실。결론통과림상실천연구，채용오미랍서납치료급성위장염효과현저，불량반응소，치득재림상중추엄응용。
Objective Clinical effect of omeprazole sodium combined with levofloxacin combined with cimetidine levofloxacin in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis were analyzed. Methods The comparative treatment analysis, a total of 240 patients with a-cute gastroenteritis patients from 2012 May to 2014 May in our hospital for treatment of intestinal tract, which were randomly di-vided into experimental group and control group, with 120 cases in each experimental group with Austria, omeprazole sodium in-travenous drip in intravenous levofloxacin treatment based on control group in the intravenous levofloxacin basis with cimetidine intravenous drip; then compared the clinical curative effect of the two groups after the treatment, and to observe their adverse re-actions. Results Patients in the experimental group after 2 days of therapy was effective for 115 cases (95.83%), effective in 4 cas-es (3.33%), invalid 1 cases (0.83%), the patients in the control group after 2 days of therapy was effective for 82 cases (68.33%), effective in 26 cases (21.67%), invalid 12 cases (10%), a significant differences between the experimental group and the control group (P<0.05); the experiment group and the control group of 9 cases of adverse reactions, including 3 cases in the experimental group, control group 6 cases, give symptomatic treatment in stopping or adverse reaction after the symptoms have disappeared. Conclusion Clinical practice through the study, the effect of omeprazole sodium for treatment of acute gastroenteritis significantly, with less adverse reactions, it is worth in clinical application.
