中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2014年
33期
56-57
,共2页
多索茶碱%氨茶碱%支气管哮喘
多索茶堿%氨茶堿%支氣管哮喘
다색다감%안다감%지기관효천
Doxofylline%Aminophylline%Bronchial asthma
目的：对比观察多索茶碱与氨茶碱治疗支气管哮喘的临床疗效。方法：2013年6月-2014年7月收治支气管哮喘患者100例，随机分为两组，各50例。多索茶碱组在基础治疗上加用多索茶碱300 mg/d，1次/d。氨茶碱组在基础治疗上加用氨茶碱250 mg/d，1次/d，连续服用7 d。比较两组临床疗效。结果：恶心、呕吐为多索茶碱与氨茶碱最常见的不良反应，两组不良反应总例数差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。与多索茶碱组比较，氨茶碱组总有效率明显下降，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论：与氨茶碱比较，多索茶碱治疗支气管哮喘疗效更好，不良反应更低。
目的：對比觀察多索茶堿與氨茶堿治療支氣管哮喘的臨床療效。方法：2013年6月-2014年7月收治支氣管哮喘患者100例，隨機分為兩組，各50例。多索茶堿組在基礎治療上加用多索茶堿300 mg/d，1次/d。氨茶堿組在基礎治療上加用氨茶堿250 mg/d，1次/d，連續服用7 d。比較兩組臨床療效。結果：噁心、嘔吐為多索茶堿與氨茶堿最常見的不良反應，兩組不良反應總例數差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05)。與多索茶堿組比較，氨茶堿組總有效率明顯下降，差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05)。結論：與氨茶堿比較，多索茶堿治療支氣管哮喘療效更好，不良反應更低。
목적：대비관찰다색다감여안다감치료지기관효천적림상료효。방법：2013년6월-2014년7월수치지기관효천환자100례，수궤분위량조，각50례。다색다감조재기출치료상가용다색다감300 mg/d，1차/d。안다감조재기출치료상가용안다감250 mg/d，1차/d，련속복용7 d。비교량조림상료효。결과：악심、구토위다색다감여안다감최상견적불량반응，량조불량반응총례수차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05)。여다색다감조비교，안다감조총유효솔명현하강，차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05)。결론：여안다감비교，다색다감치료지기관효천료효경호，불량반응경저。
Objective:To comparatively observate the clinical curative effect of doxofylline and aminophylline in the treatment of bronchial asthma.Methods:100 cases of bronchial asthma were selected from June 2013 to July 2014.They were randomly divided into two groups.The doxofylline group on the foundation treatment plus doxofylline 300 mg one day,1 time one day.The aminophylline group on the foundation treatment plus aminophylline 250 mg one day,1 time one day,continuous administration for 7 days.The clinical effect was compared.Results:Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse reactions of doxofylline and aminophylline.The total number of cases of adverse reactions in two groups had difference,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with the doxofylline group,the total effective rate of the aminophylline group decreased significantly,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with aminophylline,the doxofylline in the treatment of bronchial asthma has better effect and lower adverse reaction.
