中国老年学杂志
中國老年學雜誌
중국노년학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY
2014年
21期
6157-6159
,共3页
蔡吉梅%马佳%张忆雄%杨晓苏%宋曦玲%邹焰%李小平
蔡吉梅%馬佳%張憶雄%楊曉囌%宋晞玲%鄒燄%李小平
채길매%마가%장억웅%양효소%송희령%추염%리소평
生活质量%养老模式
生活質量%養老模式
생활질량%양로모식
Quality of life%Pension mode
目的:了解我国不同养老模式下老年人生活质量( QOL)现状及其影响因素。方法采用世界卫生组织生活质量简表( WHOQOL-BREF)对我国家庭、社区及机构养老老年人的QOL进行调查。结果三种养老模式下老年人QOL总分、生理、心理及社会关系领域得分社区养老最高、家庭次之、机构最低( P<0.05);环境领域得分为社区养老高于家庭和机构( P<0.05),家庭和机构间无显著差异( P>0.05);自评分为社区和家庭高于机构(P<0.05);QOL总分与自评分间具有正相关关系(r=0.601);不同养老模式的QOL与自评分影响因素不完全相同,主要有健康状况、文化程度、婚姻、子女状况、职业、年龄及民族。结论不同养老模式下生活质量得分有差异,且影响因素不完全相同。
目的:瞭解我國不同養老模式下老年人生活質量( QOL)現狀及其影響因素。方法採用世界衛生組織生活質量簡錶( WHOQOL-BREF)對我國傢庭、社區及機構養老老年人的QOL進行調查。結果三種養老模式下老年人QOL總分、生理、心理及社會關繫領域得分社區養老最高、傢庭次之、機構最低( P<0.05);環境領域得分為社區養老高于傢庭和機構( P<0.05),傢庭和機構間無顯著差異( P>0.05);自評分為社區和傢庭高于機構(P<0.05);QOL總分與自評分間具有正相關關繫(r=0.601);不同養老模式的QOL與自評分影響因素不完全相同,主要有健康狀況、文化程度、婚姻、子女狀況、職業、年齡及民族。結論不同養老模式下生活質量得分有差異,且影響因素不完全相同。
목적:료해아국불동양로모식하노년인생활질량( QOL)현상급기영향인소。방법채용세계위생조직생활질량간표( WHOQOL-BREF)대아국가정、사구급궤구양로노년인적QOL진행조사。결과삼충양로모식하노년인QOL총분、생리、심리급사회관계영역득분사구양로최고、가정차지、궤구최저( P<0.05);배경영역득분위사구양로고우가정화궤구( P<0.05),가정화궤구간무현저차이( P>0.05);자평분위사구화가정고우궤구(P<0.05);QOL총분여자평분간구유정상관관계(r=0.601);불동양로모식적QOL여자평분영향인소불완전상동,주요유건강상황、문화정도、혼인、자녀상황、직업、년령급민족。결론불동양로모식하생활질량득분유차이,차영향인소불완전상동。
Objective To investigate the status of the quality of life of the elderly of different pension mode and the main factors ,to provide practical basis for enhancing this pension work .Methods WHOQOL-BREF was used to analyze the quality of life of the elderly of family pension, community pension and institutional pension .Results The three kinds of pension mode ,score of QOL, physical field, psy-chological field and social relations field were different (P<0.05),community pension highest, followed by the family pension, institutional pension lowest.The environmental field, score of community pension were higher than institutional and family pension (P<0.05).The scores of self-rating,community and family pension were higher than institutional pension (P<0.05).There was a positive correlation between the score of self-rating and score of QOL(r=0.601).The main factors were physical condition , education, marriage, children status, occupa-tion, age and ethnic .Conclusions The scores of QOL of different pension model were different , the influencing factors are not identical .