中国临床医学
中國臨床醫學
중국림상의학
CLINICAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF CHINA
2014年
5期
578-580
,共3页
全结肠系膜切除术%腹腔镜%结肠癌%安全性%有效性
全結腸繫膜切除術%腹腔鏡%結腸癌%安全性%有效性
전결장계막절제술%복강경%결장암%안전성%유효성
Complete mesocolic excision%Laparoscopy%Colon cancer%Safety%Effectiveness
目的:探讨腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术(complete mesocolic excision,CME)的可行性、安全性及有效性。方法:回顾分析2012年6月—2014年6月在江苏省常熟市第一人民医院普外科行腹腔镜 CME 的21例患者(腔镜组)与行结肠癌开腹手术的27例患者(开腹组)的临床资料。比较2组患者术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目,术后开始下床时间、肛门排气时间、进半流食时间,住院天数、住院费用和并发症情况。结果:腔镜组与开腹组性别、年龄、分化程度、TNM 分期、淋巴结清扫数目、并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05);腔镜组术中出血量、术后开始下床时间、肛门排气时间、进半流食时间、住院天数、住院费用均少于或早于开腹组(P <0.05、0.01)。结论:腹腔镜 CME 安全、可行、有效,较开腹手术存在多方面的优势。
目的:探討腹腔鏡全結腸繫膜切除術(complete mesocolic excision,CME)的可行性、安全性及有效性。方法:迴顧分析2012年6月—2014年6月在江囌省常熟市第一人民醫院普外科行腹腔鏡 CME 的21例患者(腔鏡組)與行結腸癌開腹手術的27例患者(開腹組)的臨床資料。比較2組患者術中齣血量、淋巴結清掃數目,術後開始下床時間、肛門排氣時間、進半流食時間,住院天數、住院費用和併髮癥情況。結果:腔鏡組與開腹組性彆、年齡、分化程度、TNM 分期、淋巴結清掃數目、併髮癥髮生率差異均無統計學意義(P >0.05);腔鏡組術中齣血量、術後開始下床時間、肛門排氣時間、進半流食時間、住院天數、住院費用均少于或早于開腹組(P <0.05、0.01)。結論:腹腔鏡 CME 安全、可行、有效,較開腹手術存在多方麵的優勢。
목적:탐토복강경전결장계막절제술(complete mesocolic excision,CME)적가행성、안전성급유효성。방법:회고분석2012년6월—2014년6월재강소성상숙시제일인민의원보외과행복강경 CME 적21례환자(강경조)여행결장암개복수술적27례환자(개복조)적림상자료。비교2조환자술중출혈량、림파결청소수목,술후개시하상시간、항문배기시간、진반류식시간,주원천수、주원비용화병발증정황。결과:강경조여개복조성별、년령、분화정도、TNM 분기、림파결청소수목、병발증발생솔차이균무통계학의의(P >0.05);강경조술중출혈량、술후개시하상시간、항문배기시간、진반류식시간、주원천수、주원비용균소우혹조우개복조(P <0.05、0.01)。결론:복강경 CME 안전、가행、유효,교개복수술존재다방면적우세。
Objective:To explore the feasibility,safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME). Methods:A retrospective analysis was done on clinical data of 21 patients who underwent laparoscopic and 27 patients who un-derwent open surgery from Jun 2012 to Jun 2014 in Changshu First People's Hospital.Blood loss,numbers of removed lymph nodes,time of getting out of bed,anal exhaust time,time of eating half-flow food,hospital stay,hospital costs,complications were compared between the two groups.Results:No significant difference was found in gender,age,degree of differentiation, TNM stage,numbers of removed lymph nodes and the complication rates (P >0.05)between the two groups.The blood loss, beginning time of getting out of bed,anal exhaust time,time of eating half-flow food,hospital stay,hospital cost in laparoscopic group were less or earlier than those in the open group (P <0.05,0.01).Conclusions:Laparoscopic CME is safe,feasible and effective,and has many advantages than open surgery.