世界中医药
世界中醫藥
세계중의약
WORLD CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
11期
1451-1453,1458
,共4页
庄梅云%贾春华%郭瑨%杨晓媛%伏书民%朱丽颖
莊梅雲%賈春華%郭瑨%楊曉媛%伏書民%硃麗穎
장매운%가춘화%곽진%양효원%복서민%주려영
问卷调查%五行学说%原型%认知
問捲調查%五行學說%原型%認知
문권조사%오행학설%원형%인지
Questionnaire survey%Five-elements theory%Prototype category of five elements%Cognition
目的:从原型范畴理论(Prototype Category Theory)的角度,调查分析中医专业学生对五行原型的认知。方法:采用“基于原型范畴理论的五行学说调查问卷”进行专项调查与统计分析,取样共166名,分别为本科生92名,占55%、研究生74名,占45%。结果:两群组对五行原型的认知,1)依频次百分比作为认同度指标,频次百分比最高为“土”,依次为“木”“水”“金”“火”,火原型认知明显离散。2)依平均数(х)作为认知程度(Cognitive degree)评价,两群组对“木”“土”“水”的认知为“基本一致”(х>5),对“金”“火”的认知为“非常不一致”(х<5)。3)统计分析使用 SPSS 计算 t 检验与 P 值,两群组之间对五行的八个构面,其中原型、特性、相生三个构面有统计学意义(P <0.01)、五行相侮构面有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论:中医专业学生群组对中医五行学说的“原型“存在认知差异。
目的:從原型範疇理論(Prototype Category Theory)的角度,調查分析中醫專業學生對五行原型的認知。方法:採用“基于原型範疇理論的五行學說調查問捲”進行專項調查與統計分析,取樣共166名,分彆為本科生92名,佔55%、研究生74名,佔45%。結果:兩群組對五行原型的認知,1)依頻次百分比作為認同度指標,頻次百分比最高為“土”,依次為“木”“水”“金”“火”,火原型認知明顯離散。2)依平均數(х)作為認知程度(Cognitive degree)評價,兩群組對“木”“土”“水”的認知為“基本一緻”(х>5),對“金”“火”的認知為“非常不一緻”(х<5)。3)統計分析使用 SPSS 計算 t 檢驗與 P 值,兩群組之間對五行的八箇構麵,其中原型、特性、相生三箇構麵有統計學意義(P <0.01)、五行相侮構麵有統計學意義(P <0.05)。結論:中醫專業學生群組對中醫五行學說的“原型“存在認知差異。
목적:종원형범주이론(Prototype Category Theory)적각도,조사분석중의전업학생대오행원형적인지。방법:채용“기우원형범주이론적오행학설조사문권”진행전항조사여통계분석,취양공166명,분별위본과생92명,점55%、연구생74명,점45%。결과:량군조대오행원형적인지,1)의빈차백분비작위인동도지표,빈차백분비최고위“토”,의차위“목”“수”“금”“화”,화원형인지명현리산。2)의평균수(х)작위인지정도(Cognitive degree)평개,량군조대“목”“토”“수”적인지위“기본일치”(х>5),대“금”“화”적인지위“비상불일치”(х<5)。3)통계분석사용 SPSS 계산 t 검험여 P 치,량군조지간대오행적팔개구면,기중원형、특성、상생삼개구면유통계학의의(P <0.01)、오행상모구면유통계학의의(P <0.05)。결론:중의전업학생군조대중의오행학설적“원형“존재인지차이。
Objective:To investigate the cognition on prototype category of five elements among college students,and to provide educa-tion bases for the five-elements theory of Chinese medicine.Methods:By using “Category based on the theory of five elements prototype questionnaire”,166 college students in Beijing were investigated.The data were analyzed by percentage frequency distribution,descrip-tive statistics and independent-samples tests with SPSS 19.0.Results:The cognition of wood,land and water prototype fell on middle level (х>5),but gold and fire prototype fell on low level (х<5).Compared between undergraduate and graduate students,there was significant difference in the mean value of cognition of wood,land,gold and water prototype (P <0.01),mutual generation and mutual restriction of five elements (P <0.01),and reverse restriction of five elements (P <0.05).Conclusion:The cognition of five elements of college students was at middle level.They have the good perception of wood,land and water elements,but fuzzy in gold and fire ele-ments.This generally means the concept of gold and fire elements is vague,or has multiple meanings,which require further elaboration or specification to understand their applicability.