医药前沿
醫藥前沿
의약전연
YIAYAO QIANYAN
2014年
22期
293-294
,共2页
陆寅%黄琴红%曹晓东%王芳%王丽霞
陸寅%黃琴紅%曹曉東%王芳%王麗霞
륙인%황금홍%조효동%왕방%왕려하
雾化治疗%肺水肿%重度呼吸衰竭%临床护理
霧化治療%肺水腫%重度呼吸衰竭%臨床護理
무화치료%폐수종%중도호흡쇠갈%림상호리
Atomization treatment%Pulmonary edema%Severe respiratory failure%Clinical nursing
目的:探析雾化治疗肺水肿伴重度呼吸衰竭患者的临床护理效果。方法将我院自2012年6月至2014年7月间收治的96例肺水肿伴重度呼吸衰竭的患者随机的分为观察组和对照组各48例,所有患者在常规治疗的基础上使用雾化吸入治疗,观察组患者给与雾化吸入护理措施,观察两组患者的临床效果。结果观察组患者的临床总有效率为95.83%(46/48),高于对照组83.33%(40/48),其差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义;观察组患者PaO2升高、PaCO2降低,FEV1升高明显高于照组(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论给与雾化治疗肺水肿伴重度呼吸衰竭患者临床护理措施可显著的提高临床有效率。
目的:探析霧化治療肺水腫伴重度呼吸衰竭患者的臨床護理效果。方法將我院自2012年6月至2014年7月間收治的96例肺水腫伴重度呼吸衰竭的患者隨機的分為觀察組和對照組各48例,所有患者在常規治療的基礎上使用霧化吸入治療,觀察組患者給與霧化吸入護理措施,觀察兩組患者的臨床效果。結果觀察組患者的臨床總有效率為95.83%(46/48),高于對照組83.33%(40/48),其差異顯著(P<0.05),具有統計學意義;觀察組患者PaO2升高、PaCO2降低,FEV1升高明顯高于照組(P<0.05),具有統計學意義。結論給與霧化治療肺水腫伴重度呼吸衰竭患者臨床護理措施可顯著的提高臨床有效率。
목적:탐석무화치료폐수종반중도호흡쇠갈환자적림상호리효과。방법장아원자2012년6월지2014년7월간수치적96례폐수종반중도호흡쇠갈적환자수궤적분위관찰조화대조조각48례,소유환자재상규치료적기출상사용무화흡입치료,관찰조환자급여무화흡입호리조시,관찰량조환자적림상효과。결과관찰조환자적림상총유효솔위95.83%(46/48),고우대조조83.33%(40/48),기차이현저(P<0.05),구유통계학의의;관찰조환자PaO2승고、PaCO2강저,FEV1승고명현고우조조(P<0.05),구유통계학의의。결론급여무화치료폐수종반중도호흡쇠갈환자림상호리조시가현저적제고림상유효솔。
Objective: Analysis of inhalation in the treatment of pulmonary edema and effect of clinical nursing care of patients with severe respiratory failure. Methods: 96 cases of pulmonary edema in our hospital from 2012 June to 2014 July were treated with severe respiratory failure were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 48 cases in each group, al the patients the use of inhalation therapy on the basis of conventional therapy, patients in observation group were given inhalation nursing measures, to observe the clinical effect of two groups of patients. Results: Clinical observation of patients with a total effective rate of 95.83% (46/48), higher than 83.33% in the control group (40/48), the difference was significant (P < 0.05), with statistical significance; the patients in the observation group were increased PaO2, PaCO2 decreased, FEV1 increased significantly higher than that of control group (P < 0.05), with statistical significance. Conclusion: Give the inhalation in the treatment of pulmonary edema and severe respiratory failure patients with clinical nursing measures can significantly improve clinical efficiency.