中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2014年
32期
41-42,45
,共3页
黄江湖%尹晓明%林飞跃%徐杨%许春财%林蕴硕
黃江湖%尹曉明%林飛躍%徐楊%許春財%林蘊碩
황강호%윤효명%림비약%서양%허춘재%림온석
非手术脊柱减压%腰椎间盘突出症%腰椎牵引
非手術脊柱減壓%腰椎間盤突齣癥%腰椎牽引
비수술척주감압%요추간반돌출증%요추견인
Non-surgical spinal decompression%Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation%Lumbar traction
目的:探讨非手术脊柱减压治疗腰椎间盘突出症的效果。方法选取2008年7月~2012年10月本院收治的100例腰椎间盘突出症患者为研究对象,将其随机分为观察组和对照组,每组50例。对照组患者采用普通腰椎牵引治疗,观察组患者采用非手术脊柱减压系统进行牵引治疗,治疗结束后,对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组治疗有效率为96.00%,高于对照组的82.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组VAS、CODI比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组VAS、CODI均降低,观察组降低程度更明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论非手术脊柱减压较普通牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症能更好地改善患者症状、体征和帮助患者恢复活动能力。
目的:探討非手術脊柱減壓治療腰椎間盤突齣癥的效果。方法選取2008年7月~2012年10月本院收治的100例腰椎間盤突齣癥患者為研究對象,將其隨機分為觀察組和對照組,每組50例。對照組患者採用普通腰椎牽引治療,觀察組患者採用非手術脊柱減壓繫統進行牽引治療,治療結束後,對比兩組患者的治療效果。結果觀察組治療有效率為96.00%,高于對照組的82.00%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。治療前,兩組VAS、CODI比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。治療後,兩組VAS、CODI均降低,觀察組降低程度更明顯,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論非手術脊柱減壓較普通牽引治療腰椎間盤突齣癥能更好地改善患者癥狀、體徵和幫助患者恢複活動能力。
목적:탐토비수술척주감압치료요추간반돌출증적효과。방법선취2008년7월~2012년10월본원수치적100례요추간반돌출증환자위연구대상,장기수궤분위관찰조화대조조,매조50례。대조조환자채용보통요추견인치료,관찰조환자채용비수술척주감압계통진행견인치료,치료결속후,대비량조환자적치료효과。결과관찰조치료유효솔위96.00%,고우대조조적82.00%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。치료전,량조VAS、CODI비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。치료후,량조VAS、CODI균강저,관찰조강저정도경명현,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론비수술척주감압교보통견인치료요추간반돌출증능경호지개선환자증상、체정화방조환자회복활동능력。
Objective To explore the effect of non-surgical spinal decompression in the treatment of lumbar interverte-bral disc herniation. Methods 100 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in our hospital from July 2008 to October 2012 were selected as research objects and randomly divided into observation group and control group,each group of 50 cases.The common lumbar traction was provided in control group,while non-surgical spinal decompression for traction was adopted in observation group.After therapy,the curative effect in both groups was compared. Results The effective rate in observation group was 96.00%,higher than that in control group(82.00%),with statistical difference (P<0.05).Before treatment,VAS score and CODI in two groups was compared respectively,with no statistical difference (P>0.05).After therapy,VAS score and CODI was decreased respectively,the decreasing level in observation group was more remarkable than that in control group respectively,with statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusion In comparison with common traction,non-surgical spinal decompression in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation can better improve patients’symptoms and signs,help them to get recovery of daily life activity.