中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2014年
31期
185-187
,共3页
静脉用免疫球蛋白%手足口病合并脑炎%治疗%护理
靜脈用免疫毬蛋白%手足口病閤併腦炎%治療%護理
정맥용면역구단백%수족구병합병뇌염%치료%호리
Intravenous immunoglobulin%Hand-foot-mouth disease with encephalitis%Treatment%Nursing
目的:观察不同剂量静脉用免疫球蛋白治疗手足口病合并脑炎的临床效果。方法150例手足口病合并脑炎患儿随机分成3组,每组50例,3组患儿均实施常规综合疗法和护理,给予0.3~0.4 g/kg静脉用免疫球蛋白静脉滴注,连用3d者作为普通剂量组;给予1g/kg静脉用免疫球蛋白静脉滴注,连用2d者作为大剂量组,不使用静脉用免疫球蛋白者作为对照组。比较3组的退热天数、皮疹消褪时间、惊颤消失时间、脑膜刺激征消失时间、住院天数以及治疗有效率和无效率。结果与对照组比较,普通剂量组的退热天数、皮疹消褪时间、惊颤消失时间、脑膜刺激征消失时间、住院天数无明显缩短,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);大剂量组则较对照组明显缩短,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);普通剂量组的治疗有效率(86%)和无效率(14%)与对照组的治疗有效率(80%)和无效率(20%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);大剂量组治疗有效率(96%)和无效率(4%)与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论大剂量静脉用免疫球蛋白及护理干预治疗小儿手足口病合并脑炎具有良好效果。
目的:觀察不同劑量靜脈用免疫毬蛋白治療手足口病閤併腦炎的臨床效果。方法150例手足口病閤併腦炎患兒隨機分成3組,每組50例,3組患兒均實施常規綜閤療法和護理,給予0.3~0.4 g/kg靜脈用免疫毬蛋白靜脈滴註,連用3d者作為普通劑量組;給予1g/kg靜脈用免疫毬蛋白靜脈滴註,連用2d者作為大劑量組,不使用靜脈用免疫毬蛋白者作為對照組。比較3組的退熱天數、皮疹消褪時間、驚顫消失時間、腦膜刺激徵消失時間、住院天數以及治療有效率和無效率。結果與對照組比較,普通劑量組的退熱天數、皮疹消褪時間、驚顫消失時間、腦膜刺激徵消失時間、住院天數無明顯縮短,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);大劑量組則較對照組明顯縮短,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);普通劑量組的治療有效率(86%)和無效率(14%)與對照組的治療有效率(80%)和無效率(20%)比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);大劑量組治療有效率(96%)和無效率(4%)與對照組比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論大劑量靜脈用免疫毬蛋白及護理榦預治療小兒手足口病閤併腦炎具有良好效果。
목적:관찰불동제량정맥용면역구단백치료수족구병합병뇌염적림상효과。방법150례수족구병합병뇌염환인수궤분성3조,매조50례,3조환인균실시상규종합요법화호리,급여0.3~0.4 g/kg정맥용면역구단백정맥적주,련용3d자작위보통제량조;급여1g/kg정맥용면역구단백정맥적주,련용2d자작위대제량조,불사용정맥용면역구단백자작위대조조。비교3조적퇴열천수、피진소퇴시간、량전소실시간、뇌막자격정소실시간、주원천수이급치료유효솔화무효솔。결과여대조조비교,보통제량조적퇴열천수、피진소퇴시간、량전소실시간、뇌막자격정소실시간、주원천수무명현축단,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);대제량조칙교대조조명현축단,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);보통제량조적치료유효솔(86%)화무효솔(14%)여대조조적치료유효솔(80%)화무효솔(20%)비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);대제량조치료유효솔(96%)화무효솔(4%)여대조조비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론대제량정맥용면역구단백급호리간예치료소인수족구병합병뇌염구유량호효과。
Objective To observe the effect of different dose of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of hand-foot-mouth disease combined with encephalitis. Methods 150 cases with hand foot and mouth disease combined with encephalitis were randomly divided into three groups,50 cases in each group.Three groups were impienmented routine therapy and nursing,and given 0.3-0.4 g/kg immunoglobulin for intravenous drip for 3 days as the normal dose group,1 g/kg immunoglobulin intravenous drip for 2 days as the high dose group,without the use of intravenous immune globulin as control group.Fever time,rash fade time,start disappearing time,meningeal irritation sign disappearing time,length of hospital stay,and the effective rate of treatment and inefficiency were compared between the three groups after treat-ment. Results Compared with the control group,fever time,shocked disappearance time,meningeal irritation sign disap-pearing time,hospitalization time of normal dose groups was not shortened,there was no significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05),those of high dose group was significantly shorter than those of the control group,with statistical difference (P<0.05).In the Normal dose group,the treatment efficiency was 86%,inefficiency was 14%,the treatment effi-ciency and inefficiency of the control group was 80% and 20% respectively,compared with the control group,there was no significant differences(P>0.05).The treatment efficiency and inefficiency of high dose group was 96%and 4%,compared with the control group,there was significant differences(P<0.05). Conclusion High dose Intravenous immunoglobulin and nursing intervention in the treatment of children with hand-foot-mouth disease combined with encephalitis has obvious curative effect.