北方法学
北方法學
북방법학
NORTHERN LEGAL SCIENCE
2014年
6期
118-127
,共10页
仲裁员%仲裁当事人%法律关系
仲裁員%仲裁噹事人%法律關繫
중재원%중재당사인%법률관계
arbitrator%parties in dispute%legal obligation%legal relationship
英国法传统上将仲裁员与仲裁当事人之间的法律关系视为合同关系。根据《德国仲裁法》,仲裁员合同是通过仲裁当事人与仲裁员之间的要约与承诺形成的。在排除公权力干预的前提下,对争议进行公正、有效的仲裁,也包括确保仲裁员的独立性和公正性不受仲裁员与双方仲裁当事人法律关系影响,是仲裁员、指定仲裁员的仲裁当事人以及对方当事人的共同利益诉求。仲裁员追求的经济利益,超出对方仲裁当事人所预期承担的部分的利益诉求,即便存在仲裁员与指定仲裁员的仲裁当事人之间的合意,也应当服从于对争议进行公正、有效仲裁的诉求。仅从合同法出发解释仲裁员与仲裁当事人法律关系将无法满足仲裁员和双方仲裁当事人在仲裁方面共同的关于仲裁公正、有效地进行以及取得恰当的经济利益的利益诉求。仲裁员与仲裁当事人之间的法律关系是一个复合的法律关系,包含了以提供仲裁服务为标的的合同法律关系和以作出仲裁裁决为标的的身份法律关系,前者的依据是以仲裁员为一方,以双方当事人为另一方的双方当事人合意,后者的依据是法律的相关规定。
英國法傳統上將仲裁員與仲裁噹事人之間的法律關繫視為閤同關繫。根據《德國仲裁法》,仲裁員閤同是通過仲裁噹事人與仲裁員之間的要約與承諾形成的。在排除公權力榦預的前提下,對爭議進行公正、有效的仲裁,也包括確保仲裁員的獨立性和公正性不受仲裁員與雙方仲裁噹事人法律關繫影響,是仲裁員、指定仲裁員的仲裁噹事人以及對方噹事人的共同利益訴求。仲裁員追求的經濟利益,超齣對方仲裁噹事人所預期承擔的部分的利益訴求,即便存在仲裁員與指定仲裁員的仲裁噹事人之間的閤意,也應噹服從于對爭議進行公正、有效仲裁的訴求。僅從閤同法齣髮解釋仲裁員與仲裁噹事人法律關繫將無法滿足仲裁員和雙方仲裁噹事人在仲裁方麵共同的關于仲裁公正、有效地進行以及取得恰噹的經濟利益的利益訴求。仲裁員與仲裁噹事人之間的法律關繫是一箇複閤的法律關繫,包含瞭以提供仲裁服務為標的的閤同法律關繫和以作齣仲裁裁決為標的的身份法律關繫,前者的依據是以仲裁員為一方,以雙方噹事人為另一方的雙方噹事人閤意,後者的依據是法律的相關規定。
영국법전통상장중재원여중재당사인지간적법률관계시위합동관계。근거《덕국중재법》,중재원합동시통과중재당사인여중재원지간적요약여승낙형성적。재배제공권력간예적전제하,대쟁의진행공정、유효적중재,야포괄학보중재원적독립성화공정성불수중재원여쌍방중재당사인법률관계영향,시중재원、지정중재원적중재당사인이급대방당사인적공동이익소구。중재원추구적경제이익,초출대방중재당사인소예기승담적부분적이익소구,즉편존재중재원여지정중재원적중재당사인지간적합의,야응당복종우대쟁의진행공정、유효중재적소구。부종합동법출발해석중재원여중재당사인법률관계장무법만족중재원화쌍방중재당사인재중재방면공동적관우중재공정、유효지진행이급취득흡당적경제이익적이익소구。중재원여중재당사인지간적법률관계시일개복합적법률관계,포함료이제공중재복무위표적적합동법률관계화이작출중재재결위표적적신빈법률관계,전자적의거시이중재원위일방,이쌍방당사인위령일방적쌍방당사인합의,후자적의거시법률적상관규정。
In accordance with the British law, the legal relationship between arbitrators and parties in dis-pute is traditionally considered to be contractual.According to the German Arbitration Law, the arbitrator's contract is formed between the arbitrator and parties in dispute by means of offer and acceptance.Upon exclu-sion of interference from public power, the common interest among the arbitrator, the party who appoints the arbitrator and the other party is to guarantee an impartial and effective arbitration over disputes and to ensure the independence and impartiality of arbitrators not be affected by the legal relationship between the arbitrator and parties in dispute.Where the economic interest pursued by the arbitrators exceeds the expected obligation of the other party in dispute, despite an agreement has been concluded between the arbitrator and the party who appoints the arbitrator, the pursuit of an impartial and effective arbitration shall prevail. Therefore, the interpretation of the legal relationship between the arbitrator and parties in dispute from contract law cannot satisfy the pursuit of impartial and effective arbitration as well as their proper economic interest .The legal rela-tionship between the arbitrator and parties in dispute is compound, which includes the contractual relation of providing arbitration services and the status relation to confer arbitration awards.The former is based on the a-greement between the arbitrator and parties in dispute;the latter is based on pertinent legal rules.