重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
33期
4507-4509
,共3页
结构效度%探索性因子分析%验证性因子分析
結構效度%探索性因子分析%驗證性因子分析
결구효도%탐색성인자분석%험증성인자분석
construct validity%exploratory factor analysis%confirmatory factor analysis
目的:通过探讨后勤管理人员工作满意度潜在因素结构,评价调查表结构效度。方法采用探索性因子分析(EFA )和验证性因子分析(CFA)评价调查表的结构效度。结果 EFA将调查表归为6个因子,分别从属于工作满意度和职业忠诚度,每个因子能得到合理解释,累积贡献率达70.306%。工作满意度部分 EFA归为5个公因子,解释70.514%信息量。用 LIS‐REL8.70软件进行CFA得到模型1和模型2,X2自由度比小于5,除调整拟合优度指数(AGFI)略小于0.9,其他拟合指数均大于0.9,标准化残差均方根(SRMR)和近似误差均方根(RMSEA)均小于0.08。结论 EFA和CFA均显示调查表具有较好的结构效度。
目的:通過探討後勤管理人員工作滿意度潛在因素結構,評價調查錶結構效度。方法採用探索性因子分析(EFA )和驗證性因子分析(CFA)評價調查錶的結構效度。結果 EFA將調查錶歸為6箇因子,分彆從屬于工作滿意度和職業忠誠度,每箇因子能得到閤理解釋,纍積貢獻率達70.306%。工作滿意度部分 EFA歸為5箇公因子,解釋70.514%信息量。用 LIS‐REL8.70軟件進行CFA得到模型1和模型2,X2自由度比小于5,除調整擬閤優度指數(AGFI)略小于0.9,其他擬閤指數均大于0.9,標準化殘差均方根(SRMR)和近似誤差均方根(RMSEA)均小于0.08。結論 EFA和CFA均顯示調查錶具有較好的結構效度。
목적:통과탐토후근관리인원공작만의도잠재인소결구,평개조사표결구효도。방법채용탐색성인자분석(EFA )화험증성인자분석(CFA)평개조사표적결구효도。결과 EFA장조사표귀위6개인자,분별종속우공작만의도화직업충성도,매개인자능득도합리해석,루적공헌솔체70.306%。공작만의도부분 EFA귀위5개공인자,해석70.514%신식량。용 LIS‐REL8.70연건진행CFA득도모형1화모형2,X2자유도비소우5,제조정의합우도지수(AGFI)략소우0.9,기타의합지수균대우0.9,표준화잔차균방근(SRMR)화근사오차균방근(RMSEA)균소우0.08。결론 EFA화CFA균현시조사표구유교호적결구효도。
Objective To confirm the structure validity of questionnaire through a probe into latent factorial structure of the rear service personnel′s job satisfaction from polyclinics hospitals .Methods The questionnaire′s construct validity was estimated by ex‐ploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) .Results Exploratory factor analysis made the question‐naire including six factors which belonged to job satisfaction and occupation loyalty .Every factor had reasonable explanation and six factors remained 70 .306% information .Exploratory factor analysis of job satisfaction showed five factors ,explaining 70 .514% in‐formation .The confirmatory factor analysis model 1 and model 2 were conducted by LISREL8 .70 software .The results showed that X2 freedom degree was less than 5 .In addition to adjust the goodness of fit index was less than 0 .9 ,all other fit indices were greater than 0 .9 .At the same time ,SRMR and RMSEA were less than 0 .08 .Conclusion The results of exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) both reveal that the questionnaire′s construct validity was good .