CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察分析急性和慢性牙髓炎一次性根管治疗的治愈情况。方法临床诊断为急性牙髓炎和慢性牙髓炎的磨牙120例一次治疗内完成根管预备和根管充填，与60例2次疗程（期间氢氧化钙封药）完成根管治疗的类似患牙进行临床效果比较分析。临床观察的主要指标包括术后6个月及2年的X线片和临床评定的治愈率。结果术后6个月一次组治愈率88．7％，两次组治愈率89．6％，差异无统计学意义（P＞0．05）；术后2年一次组治愈率84．5％，两次组治愈率82．5％，差异无统计学意义（ P＞0．05）。结论活髓牙一次性根充和两次性根充治愈率相同，但是减少了患者就诊次数、节省了治疗费用，值得推广。
목적：관찰분석급성화만성아수염일차성근관치료적치유정황。방법림상진단위급성아수염화만성아수염적마아120례일차치료내완성근관예비화근관충전，여60례2차료정（기간경양화개봉약）완성근관치료적유사환아진행림상효과비교분석。림상관찰적주요지표포괄술후6개월급2년적X선편화림상평정적치유솔。결과술후6개월일차조치유솔88．7％，량차조치유솔89．6％，차이무통계학의의（P＞0．05）；술후2년일차조치유솔84．5％，량차조치유솔82．5％，차이무통계학의의（ P＞0．05）。결론활수아일차성근충화량차성근충치유솔상동，단시감소료환자취진차수、절성료치료비용，치득추엄。
[ ABSTRACT] Objective To clinically evaluate the healing effect of one-visit endodontic treatment for acute pulpitis and chronic pulpitis.Methods One-visit root canal therapy group includes 120 cases.Two-visit group using cal-cium hydroxide as an interappointment medicament includes 60 cases.A comparison of clinical results was done between the two groups.The main assessments included the six months'(one visit 88.7%,two visit 89.6%,P>0.05) and two years'(one visit 84.5%,two visit 82.5%,P>0.05) healing response.Results There was no statistically significance between six months'and two years'healing response.Conclusion One-visit endodontic treatment for acute pulpitis and chronic pulpitis has the same clinical efficacy with two-visit endodontic treatment and is worthy of extending.