化工进展
化工進展
화공진전
CHEMICAL INDUSTRY AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS
2014年
12期
3183-3188,3193
,共7页
朱凌云%杨锦春%周帼彦%谭祥辉%郭震%朱辉%郎红方%朱冬生
硃凌雲%楊錦春%週幗彥%譚祥輝%郭震%硃輝%郎紅方%硃鼕生
주릉운%양금춘%주귁언%담상휘%곽진%주휘%랑홍방%주동생
三叶孔板%传热%计算流体动力学%影响因素%数值模拟
三葉孔闆%傳熱%計算流體動力學%影響因素%數值模擬
삼협공판%전열%계산류체동역학%영향인소%수치모의
trefoil-baffle%heat transfer%computational fluid dynamics(CFD)%influence factor%numerical simulation
建立了三叶孔板换热器壳程周期性全截面模型,利用商用软件Fluent14.0及RNG k-ε湍流模型对8种不同结构参数的换热器壳程流体流动及传热性能进行数值模拟。分析了支撑板间距、三叶孔孔高、导流筒结构形式等结构参数对三叶孔板换热器传热及阻力性能的影响,并对比不同结构换热器的综合换热性能。结果表明:壳程传热系数与压力梯度都分别随着支撑板间距和开孔高度的增加而减小,且支撑板间距和三叶孔孔高对三叶孔板换热器壳程压降的影响大于其对传热的影响;六边形结构的导流筒换热器换热性能优于圆形导流筒换热器;8种换热器模型中,支撑板间距400mm、三叶孔高3.3mm(模型4-2)的换热器综合性能最好,支撑板间距400mm、三叶孔高1.8mm(模型2-2)的换热器综合性能最差。
建立瞭三葉孔闆換熱器殼程週期性全截麵模型,利用商用軟件Fluent14.0及RNG k-ε湍流模型對8種不同結構參數的換熱器殼程流體流動及傳熱性能進行數值模擬。分析瞭支撐闆間距、三葉孔孔高、導流筒結構形式等結構參數對三葉孔闆換熱器傳熱及阻力性能的影響,併對比不同結構換熱器的綜閤換熱性能。結果錶明:殼程傳熱繫數與壓力梯度都分彆隨著支撐闆間距和開孔高度的增加而減小,且支撐闆間距和三葉孔孔高對三葉孔闆換熱器殼程壓降的影響大于其對傳熱的影響;六邊形結構的導流筒換熱器換熱性能優于圓形導流筒換熱器;8種換熱器模型中,支撐闆間距400mm、三葉孔高3.3mm(模型4-2)的換熱器綜閤性能最好,支撐闆間距400mm、三葉孔高1.8mm(模型2-2)的換熱器綜閤性能最差。
건립료삼협공판환열기각정주기성전절면모형,이용상용연건Fluent14.0급RNG k-ε단류모형대8충불동결구삼수적환열기각정류체류동급전열성능진행수치모의。분석료지탱판간거、삼협공공고、도류통결구형식등결구삼수대삼협공판환열기전열급조력성능적영향,병대비불동결구환열기적종합환열성능。결과표명:각정전열계수여압력제도도분별수착지탱판간거화개공고도적증가이감소,차지탱판간거화삼협공공고대삼협공판환열기각정압강적영향대우기대전열적영향;륙변형결구적도류통환열기환열성능우우원형도류통환열기;8충환열기모형중,지탱판간거400mm、삼협공고3.3mm(모형4-2)적환열기종합성능최호,지탱판간거400mm、삼협공고1.8mm(모형2-2)적환열기종합성능최차。
This research established a simplified periodic model for the flow and heat transfer on shell side of heat exchangers with trefoil-baffles. Based on the RNG k-εturbulence model,the flow and heat transfer characteristics on shell side were investigated by using commercial CFD software Fluent14.0 for 8 heat exchanger samples with different structural parameters. Effects of the structural parameters,including baffle pitch,trefoil-hole height and draft tube structure,on the performance of heat transfer and friction were analyzed. The results showed that the heat transfer coefficient and pressure gradient decreased when baffle pitch,as well as trefoil-hole height, increased. Baffle pitch and trefoil-hole height had larger influence on pressure drop than that on heat transfer coefficient. The heat exchanger with hexagon draft tube had better heat transfer performance than that with circle draft tube. The comprehensive performances were also evaluated. The Case 4-2 (Lb=400mm,H=3.3mm)was best and case 2-2(Lb=400mm,H=1.8mm)was worst among all heat exchangers with different structural parameters.