医学理论与实践
醫學理論與實踐
의학이론여실천
The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
2014年
22期
2947-2948,2974
,共3页
郑爱东%万镇%范修才%祁建成
鄭愛東%萬鎮%範脩纔%祁建成
정애동%만진%범수재%기건성
炎性因子%支架植入术%再狭窄
炎性因子%支架植入術%再狹窄
염성인자%지가식입술%재협착
Inflammatory factor%Coronary stent implantation%In stent restenosis
目的:探讨炎性因子与冠状动脉支架植入术后再狭窄发生的相关性。方法:收集我院近5年冠状动脉支架植入术患者80例,根据其是否发生再狭窄情况分为两组,比较其IL‐10、IL‐6、IL‐6/IL‐10、CRP水平。结果:80例患者中11例发生支架内再狭窄,再狭窄率13.75%;发生再狭窄患者与未发生狭窄患者术前IL‐6差异有统计学意义( P<0.05),术后两组IL‐6均明显增加(P<0.05),且ISR组增加程度更为显著(P<0.05);术前两组患者IL‐10差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后两组IL‐10均明显降低(P<0.05),且ISR组降低程度更为显著(P<0.05);术前IL‐6/IL‐10差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但ISR组IL‐6/IL‐10增加显著(P<0.05),无ISR组未出现明显变化(P>0.05),两组术后差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);CRP术前差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后ISR组明显增加(P<0.05),且高于无ISR组(P<0.05)。结论:IL‐10、IL‐6、IL‐6/IL‐10、CRP尤其是基础IL‐10、IL‐6水平与再狭窄发生密切相关,可以作为再狭窄发生的预测指标。
目的:探討炎性因子與冠狀動脈支架植入術後再狹窄髮生的相關性。方法:收集我院近5年冠狀動脈支架植入術患者80例,根據其是否髮生再狹窄情況分為兩組,比較其IL‐10、IL‐6、IL‐6/IL‐10、CRP水平。結果:80例患者中11例髮生支架內再狹窄,再狹窄率13.75%;髮生再狹窄患者與未髮生狹窄患者術前IL‐6差異有統計學意義( P<0.05),術後兩組IL‐6均明顯增加(P<0.05),且ISR組增加程度更為顯著(P<0.05);術前兩組患者IL‐10差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),術後兩組IL‐10均明顯降低(P<0.05),且ISR組降低程度更為顯著(P<0.05);術前IL‐6/IL‐10差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),但ISR組IL‐6/IL‐10增加顯著(P<0.05),無ISR組未齣現明顯變化(P>0.05),兩組術後差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);CRP術前差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),術後ISR組明顯增加(P<0.05),且高于無ISR組(P<0.05)。結論:IL‐10、IL‐6、IL‐6/IL‐10、CRP尤其是基礎IL‐10、IL‐6水平與再狹窄髮生密切相關,可以作為再狹窄髮生的預測指標。
목적:탐토염성인자여관상동맥지가식입술후재협착발생적상관성。방법:수집아원근5년관상동맥지가식입술환자80례,근거기시부발생재협착정황분위량조,비교기IL‐10、IL‐6、IL‐6/IL‐10、CRP수평。결과:80례환자중11례발생지가내재협착,재협착솔13.75%;발생재협착환자여미발생협착환자술전IL‐6차이유통계학의의( P<0.05),술후량조IL‐6균명현증가(P<0.05),차ISR조증가정도경위현저(P<0.05);술전량조환자IL‐10차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),술후량조IL‐10균명현강저(P<0.05),차ISR조강저정도경위현저(P<0.05);술전IL‐6/IL‐10차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단ISR조IL‐6/IL‐10증가현저(P<0.05),무ISR조미출현명현변화(P>0.05),량조술후차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);CRP술전차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),술후ISR조명현증가(P<0.05),차고우무ISR조(P<0.05)。결론:IL‐10、IL‐6、IL‐6/IL‐10、CRP우기시기출IL‐10、IL‐6수평여재협착발생밀절상관,가이작위재협착발생적예측지표。
Objective :To investigate the correlation between inflammatory cytokines and in‐stent restenosis (ISR) after coronary stenting .Methods :80 cases of coronary stenting in recent 5 years of our hospital were divided into 2 groups ac‐cording to whether it is stent‐restenosis ,and comparing the level of IL‐10 ,IL‐6 ,IL‐6/IL‐10 ,CRP .Results:11 cases in 80 patients had stent‐restenosis ,costing 13 .75% ;there was statistical significance in IL‐6 level of patients with rest‐enosis and without restenosis before coronary stenting (P<0 .05) ,and after coronary stenting IL‐6 level of these two groups were significantly increased(P<0 .05) ,ISR group increased more significantly (P<0 .05);there was statistical significance in IL‐10 level for these two groups before coronary stenting (P<0 .05) ,while after coronary stenting two groups of IL‐10 were significantly decreased (P<0 .05) ,and ISR group decreased more significantly (P<0 .05);there was no significantly difference in IL‐6/IL‐10 before coronary stenting (P>0 .05) ,but the ISR group in IL‐6/IL‐10 in‐creased significantly(P<0 .05) ,but there was no significant different in the other group(P>0 .05) ,but after coronary stenting there was significant different between two groups (P<0 .05);before coronary stenting CRP has no signifi‐cant difference ,but after coronary stenting ISR was significantly increased (P< 0 .05) ,and higher than the other group (P<0 .05) .Conclusion:IL‐10 ,IL‐6 ,IL‐6/IL‐10 ,CRP are closely related to stent‐restenosis ,especially IL‐10 ,IL‐6 .They can be used as predictors of restenosis .