生态与农村环境学报
生態與農村環境學報
생태여농촌배경학보
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY AND RURAL ENVIRONMENT
2014年
6期
806-810
,共5页
郭德杰%吴华山%马艳%常志州
郭德傑%吳華山%馬豔%常誌州
곽덕걸%오화산%마염%상지주
大肠菌群%沼液%贮存%田间施用%消长动态
大腸菌群%沼液%貯存%田間施用%消長動態
대장균군%소액%저존%전간시용%소장동태
fecal coliform%biogas slurry%storage%top-dressed in the field%dynamic change
以猪场粪污水厌氧发酵产生的沼液为材料,分别在冬春季和夏秋季对其采用加盖和无盖2种方式贮存,定期检测沼液中大肠菌群数量;通过田间生菜种植试验,定期施用大肠菌群数量(以下均以 CFU 计)分别为104( WF)、105( LF)、106( MF)和107 g-1( HF)的沼液,在沼液施用完毕后第3、10、17和24天检测土壤、生菜表面和生菜体内大肠菌群数量。结果表明:夏秋季大肠菌群存活时间较长,沼液无盖贮存可使大肠菌群数量减少。沼液贮存50 d后,除冬春季无盖贮存的沼液中大肠菌群数量达到GB 8978—2002《污水综合排放标准》中三级排放要求,可以排放以外,其他处理均未达到排放要求。沼液中大肠菌群数量越高,经农田施用后土壤中大肠菌群数量越多,生菜表面和体内大肠菌群数量也越高,但随时间延长大肠菌群数量变化略有不同。检测期内,WF处理农田土壤中大肠菌群数量显著低于其他处理;沼液施毕后第3天,WF处理生菜表面及体内大肠菌群数量均显著小于HF和MF处理;24 d时各处理生菜体内大肠菌群数量均检测不到,达到GB 4789?3—2010《食品安全国家标准食品微生物学检验大肠菌群计数》要求,生菜表面大肠菌群数量对数值小于3?51,但未达GB 4789?3—2010要求。
以豬場糞汙水厭氧髮酵產生的沼液為材料,分彆在鼕春季和夏鞦季對其採用加蓋和無蓋2種方式貯存,定期檢測沼液中大腸菌群數量;通過田間生菜種植試驗,定期施用大腸菌群數量(以下均以 CFU 計)分彆為104( WF)、105( LF)、106( MF)和107 g-1( HF)的沼液,在沼液施用完畢後第3、10、17和24天檢測土壤、生菜錶麵和生菜體內大腸菌群數量。結果錶明:夏鞦季大腸菌群存活時間較長,沼液無蓋貯存可使大腸菌群數量減少。沼液貯存50 d後,除鼕春季無蓋貯存的沼液中大腸菌群數量達到GB 8978—2002《汙水綜閤排放標準》中三級排放要求,可以排放以外,其他處理均未達到排放要求。沼液中大腸菌群數量越高,經農田施用後土壤中大腸菌群數量越多,生菜錶麵和體內大腸菌群數量也越高,但隨時間延長大腸菌群數量變化略有不同。檢測期內,WF處理農田土壤中大腸菌群數量顯著低于其他處理;沼液施畢後第3天,WF處理生菜錶麵及體內大腸菌群數量均顯著小于HF和MF處理;24 d時各處理生菜體內大腸菌群數量均檢測不到,達到GB 4789?3—2010《食品安全國傢標準食品微生物學檢驗大腸菌群計數》要求,生菜錶麵大腸菌群數量對數值小于3?51,但未達GB 4789?3—2010要求。
이저장분오수염양발효산생적소액위재료,분별재동춘계화하추계대기채용가개화무개2충방식저존,정기검측소액중대장균군수량;통과전간생채충식시험,정기시용대장균군수량(이하균이 CFU 계)분별위104( WF)、105( LF)、106( MF)화107 g-1( HF)적소액,재소액시용완필후제3、10、17화24천검측토양、생채표면화생채체내대장균군수량。결과표명:하추계대장균군존활시간교장,소액무개저존가사대장균군수량감소。소액저존50 d후,제동춘계무개저존적소액중대장균군수량체도GB 8978—2002《오수종합배방표준》중삼급배방요구,가이배방이외,기타처리균미체도배방요구。소액중대장균군수량월고,경농전시용후토양중대장균군수량월다,생채표면화체내대장균군수량야월고,단수시간연장대장균군수량변화략유불동。검측기내,WF처리농전토양중대장균군수량현저저우기타처리;소액시필후제3천,WF처리생채표면급체내대장균군수량균현저소우HF화MF처리;24 d시각처리생채체내대장균군수량균검측불도,체도GB 4789?3—2010《식품안전국가표준식품미생물학검험대장균군계수》요구,생채표면대장균군수량대수치소우3?51,단미체GB 4789?3—2010요구。
Biogas slurry produced from anaerobically digested pig waste from an intensive pig farm was used for study. Population of fecal coliforms in the slurry under storage ( covered or open) in winter and spring, and summer and autumn was monitored. And the slurries, different in coliform population [104(Treatment WF), 105(Treatment LF), 106(Treat?ment MF) and 107 cfu·g-1( Treatment HF) ] were top?dressed separately on lettuce in the field. Samples of soil and let?tuce were collected from the field 3, 10, 17 and 24 days after the top?dressing for analysis of population of coliforms in the soil, on the surface of and in the lettuce. Results show that coliforms in the slurry lived longer in SA, and open storage re?duced the population of coliforms. After 50 days of storage, all the treatments failed to meet Grade III criteria of the“Inte?grated Standard for Discharge of Wastewater GB 8978—2002”, except for the treatment of open storage in WS. The more the coliforms that survived in the slurry, the more the coliforms that could be found in the soil, on the surface of and in the lettuce that was top?dressed with the slurry. However, the population of coliforms varied with time. During the monitoring period, Treatment WF under open storage was significantly lower than the others in population of coliforms in the soil. On the 3rd day after the top?dressing, Treatment WF was much lower than Treatments HF and MF in number of coliforms on the surface of and in the lettuce, and 24 days after the top?dressing, coliforms were no longer detected in the lettuce in all the treatments, which is up to the“National Standard for Food Safety”, however, they could still be found on the surface of the lettuce with logarithmic value of the population being lower than 3?51, which fails to the “National Standard for Food Safety”.