生态与农村环境学报
生態與農村環境學報
생태여농촌배경학보
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY AND RURAL ENVIRONMENT
2014年
6期
699-705
,共7页
贺涛%许振成%魏东洋%白中炎%任明忠%白小舰
賀濤%許振成%魏東洋%白中炎%任明忠%白小艦
하도%허진성%위동양%백중염%임명충%백소함
PAEs%水源集水区%健康风险评估
PAEs%水源集水區%健康風險評估
PAEs%수원집수구%건강풍험평고
PAEs( phthalic acid esters)%water source catchment%environmental health risk assessment
以饮用水源集水区为中心,沿支流采集水样,采用美国环境保护署( USEPA)暴露风险评价方法,结合该地区的参数计算环境健康风险。结果表明:(1)所有采样点均检出PAEs类污染物邻苯二甲酸正丁酯(DBP)、邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DOP)和邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP),其中DOP高于DBP和DEP。(2)该饮用水源集水区3种PAEs污染物质量浓度均高于流域内其他乡镇饮用水源,在国内外同类地区也属于中上水平。 DOP是集水区内需首要控制的PAEs类污染物。(3)在人类活动干扰少的地区河流污染物的环境健康风险水平较低,而在人口密集区和工业集中区风险水平较高。河流上游风险值低,中游高,下游和库区又逐渐回落。该水源集水区的PAEs类污染物环境健康风险值未超过USEPA规定,但与国内外其它地区相比属于中上水平,存在一定的潜在健康风险,需要根据PAEs的可能来源在水源地环境风险管理中加以防范。
以飲用水源集水區為中心,沿支流採集水樣,採用美國環境保護署( USEPA)暴露風險評價方法,結閤該地區的參數計算環境健康風險。結果錶明:(1)所有採樣點均檢齣PAEs類汙染物鄰苯二甲痠正丁酯(DBP)、鄰苯二甲痠二(2-乙基己基)酯(DOP)和鄰苯二甲痠二乙酯(DEP),其中DOP高于DBP和DEP。(2)該飲用水源集水區3種PAEs汙染物質量濃度均高于流域內其他鄉鎮飲用水源,在國內外同類地區也屬于中上水平。 DOP是集水區內需首要控製的PAEs類汙染物。(3)在人類活動榦擾少的地區河流汙染物的環境健康風險水平較低,而在人口密集區和工業集中區風險水平較高。河流上遊風險值低,中遊高,下遊和庫區又逐漸迴落。該水源集水區的PAEs類汙染物環境健康風險值未超過USEPA規定,但與國內外其它地區相比屬于中上水平,存在一定的潛在健康風險,需要根據PAEs的可能來源在水源地環境風險管理中加以防範。
이음용수원집수구위중심,연지류채집수양,채용미국배경보호서( USEPA)폭로풍험평개방법,결합해지구적삼수계산배경건강풍험。결과표명:(1)소유채양점균검출PAEs류오염물린분이갑산정정지(DBP)、린분이갑산이(2-을기기기)지(DOP)화린분이갑산이을지(DEP),기중DOP고우DBP화DEP。(2)해음용수원집수구3충PAEs오염물질량농도균고우류역내기타향진음용수원,재국내외동류지구야속우중상수평。 DOP시집수구내수수요공제적PAEs류오염물。(3)재인류활동간우소적지구하류오염물적배경건강풍험수평교저,이재인구밀집구화공업집중구풍험수평교고。하류상유풍험치저,중유고,하유화고구우축점회락。해수원집수구적PAEs류오염물배경건강풍험치미초과USEPA규정,단여국내외기타지구상비속우중상수평,존재일정적잠재건강풍험,수요근거PAEs적가능래원재수원지배경풍험관리중가이방범。
Water samples were collected along the tributaries of a drinking water source catchment for analysis in line with the procedure for risk assessment of the USEPA, and environment health risk of phthalic acid esters ( PAEs) was assessed by taking into account the parameters of the region. Results show that ( 1) all the samples were found to have PAEs like pollutants, including di (2?ethylhexyl) phthalate (DOP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), di?n?butyl phthalate (DBP), among which DOP was higher than the other two, displaying an order of DOP > DEP > DBP.(2) The concentrations of DOP, DEP and DBP in the water catchment were all higher than their respective ones in other drinking water source catchments in the region and could also be sorted into the moderate or upper level of contamination in similar areas in the country and others. DOP was designated the primarily controlled contaminant of the water source catchment. ( 3) In areas less affected by anthrogenic disturbance, environmental health risk of pollutants in rivers was low, while in areas densely populated and concentrated with industry, the risk was high. Along a river, the risk was low in the upper reaches, high in the middle rea?ches and low again in the lower reaches or the reservoirs. Therefore, it can be concluded that the environment health risk of PAEs like contaminants in headwater catchment has not yet exceeded the criteria of USEPA, but among similar regions the world over, this region is moderate or high in concentration of PAEs like contaminants and does have some potential health risks. It is, therefore, essential to track potential source of PAEs in the region and take corresponding countermeasures to control the sources in environmental risk management of the region.