CAJ | 학술논문

以广州12个保障房社区的问卷抽样调查为基础，从住房建设与住房结构、保障房建设、保障性住房社区3个层面探究了城市住房与保障房的关系，对当前广州保障房社区现状进行定量分析，并从社区层面检验当前保障房建设模式下的实际效果。研究发现，总体上，20世纪90年代后广州住房质量提升明显，配套设施不断完善，但住房拥有率低，租赁住房是城市居民的重要选择；且住房市场的发展并未较好地解决居民的住房需求，保障性住房缺口较大，城市住房保障职能部分转嫁于城中村等“非正规”居住空间，住房保障体系仍有较大的提升空间。在保障房社区层面，存在部分配套设施可达性低、居民社区参与程度低等问题，但居民的满意度较高，居住意愿达到了89.2%，这表明当前大规模保障房建设具有其合理性。但当前保障房建设模式忽视了保障房社区的后续发展，已出现社区居民社会融合度低、发展机会少等问题，并可能向新的贫困集聚区演化。
이엄주12개보장방사구적문권추양조사위기출，종주방건설여주방결구、보장방건설、보장성주방사구3개층면탐구료성시주방여보장방적관계，대당전엄주보장방사구현상진행정량분석，병종사구층면검험당전보장방건설모식하적실제효과。연구발현，총체상，20세기90년대후엄주주방질량제승명현，배투설시불단완선，단주방옹유솔저，조임주방시성시거민적중요선택；차주방시장적발전병미교호지해결거민적주방수구，보장성주방결구교대，성시주방보장직능부분전가우성중촌등“비정규”거주공간，주방보장체계잉유교대적제승공간。재보장방사구층면，존재부분배투설시가체성저、거민사구삼여정도저등문제，단거민적만의도교고，거주의원체도료89.2%，저표명당전대규모보장방건설구유기합이성。단당전보장방건설모식홀시료보장방사구적후속발전，이출현사구거민사회융합도저、발전궤회소등문제，병가능향신적빈곤집취구연화。
In order to understand the development of China’s affordable housing, a case study was applied to analyze the construction of such specific housing in Guangzhou City, the capital of Guangdong Province. We collected the main qualitative data from a total of 240 residents with a stratified random sampling method by means of questionnaire in 12 affordable housing communities of Guangzhou. We also used the Guangzhou statistical yearbook data and the 6th population census data to examine the differences between urban housing and affordable housing. The status of affordable housing was also evaluated. We evaluated the social effects of this mode of affordable housing construction. In this paper, we find that the quality of housing improved quickly after 1990s. However, the homeownership rate remains low. The affordable housing system is by no means perfect, and the demand for affordable housing increases in recent years. In fact, informal living space such as urban villages plays an important role in the housing of low-end residents. At the community level, we find that the residents of affordable housing have a high level of satisfaction. However, the current affordable housing construction mode is unsustainable as it neglects community and residents’ social integration, as the lack of development opportunities may result in the agglomeration of new poverty and bring about the production of new ghetto-like areas.