中国医学影像学杂志
中國醫學影像學雜誌
중국의학영상학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING
2014年
11期
830-833,837
,共5页
冯飞%王丽%陈汉威%戚玉龙%刘德祥%黄益%唐郁宽%张娜
馮飛%王麗%陳漢威%慼玉龍%劉德祥%黃益%唐鬱寬%張娜
풍비%왕려%진한위%척옥룡%류덕상%황익%당욱관%장나
关节炎,类风湿%磁共振成像%手动脉%血流敏感散相%平衡稳态自由进动
關節炎,類風濕%磁共振成像%手動脈%血流敏感散相%平衡穩態自由進動
관절염,류풍습%자공진성상%수동맥%혈류민감산상%평형은태자유진동
Arthritis,rheumatoid%Magnetic resonance imaging%Artery of hand%Flow-sensitive dephasing%Balance steady-state free precession
目的初步探讨基于血流敏感散相(FSD)和平衡稳态自由进动(SSFP)的非增强磁共振血管成像(NCE-MRA)技术在显示类风湿性关节炎患者手动脉的临床应用价值。资料与方法22例类风湿性关节炎患者采用1.5T成像系统进行手动脉NCE-MRA和增强磁共振血管成像(CE-MRA)检查。对手动脉(划分为腕部、掌部和指部3个血管节段)的图像质量进行评分,并对图像信噪比(SNR)、对比度噪声比(CNR)和血管边缘锐利度进行测量。将NCE-MRA和CE-MRA的图像质量和测量值进行统计学比较。结果22例患者24只手均成功完成NCE-MRA和动态CE-MRA检查。72个血管节段中,NCE-MRA有69个动脉节段的图像质量具有诊断意义,明显高于CE-MRA(96%比83%,P<0.05)。此外,NCE-MRA在手动脉各个部位的图像质量以及SNR、CNR和血管锐利度均优于CE-MRA(P<0.05)。结论 NCE-MRA能清楚地显示手动脉的各个分支,图像质量优于动态CE-MRA,对手动脉病变的诊断具有较好的临床应用潜力。
目的初步探討基于血流敏感散相(FSD)和平衡穩態自由進動(SSFP)的非增彊磁共振血管成像(NCE-MRA)技術在顯示類風濕性關節炎患者手動脈的臨床應用價值。資料與方法22例類風濕性關節炎患者採用1.5T成像繫統進行手動脈NCE-MRA和增彊磁共振血管成像(CE-MRA)檢查。對手動脈(劃分為腕部、掌部和指部3箇血管節段)的圖像質量進行評分,併對圖像信譟比(SNR)、對比度譟聲比(CNR)和血管邊緣銳利度進行測量。將NCE-MRA和CE-MRA的圖像質量和測量值進行統計學比較。結果22例患者24隻手均成功完成NCE-MRA和動態CE-MRA檢查。72箇血管節段中,NCE-MRA有69箇動脈節段的圖像質量具有診斷意義,明顯高于CE-MRA(96%比83%,P<0.05)。此外,NCE-MRA在手動脈各箇部位的圖像質量以及SNR、CNR和血管銳利度均優于CE-MRA(P<0.05)。結論 NCE-MRA能清楚地顯示手動脈的各箇分支,圖像質量優于動態CE-MRA,對手動脈病變的診斷具有較好的臨床應用潛力。
목적초보탐토기우혈류민감산상(FSD)화평형은태자유진동(SSFP)적비증강자공진혈관성상(NCE-MRA)기술재현시류풍습성관절염환자수동맥적림상응용개치。자료여방법22례류풍습성관절염환자채용1.5T성상계통진행수동맥NCE-MRA화증강자공진혈관성상(CE-MRA)검사。대수동맥(화분위완부、장부화지부3개혈관절단)적도상질량진행평분,병대도상신조비(SNR)、대비도조성비(CNR)화혈관변연예리도진행측량。장NCE-MRA화CE-MRA적도상질량화측량치진행통계학비교。결과22례환자24지수균성공완성NCE-MRA화동태CE-MRA검사。72개혈관절단중,NCE-MRA유69개동맥절단적도상질량구유진단의의,명현고우CE-MRA(96%비83%,P<0.05)。차외,NCE-MRA재수동맥각개부위적도상질량이급SNR、CNR화혈관예리도균우우CE-MRA(P<0.05)。결론 NCE-MRA능청초지현시수동맥적각개분지,도상질량우우동태CE-MRA,대수동맥병변적진단구유교호적림상응용잠력。
Purpose To assess the clinical application of non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography (NCE-MRA) using flow sensitive dephasing (FSD) prepared steady-state free precession (SSFP) for displaying hand arteries of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Materials and Methods Twenty-two patients with rheumatoid arthritis were recruited in this study. All the patients undertook hand NCE-MRA and three-dimensional dynamic CE-MRA on a 1.5T MR scanner. The informed consent was obtained from each subject. Image quality was assessed independently by two experienced radiologists at three arterial segments (wrist arteries, palm arteries, andfinger arteries) with a four-point scale. Signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast to noise ratio (CNR), and vessel sharpness were evaluated by a magnetic resonance physicist. The results and image quality were statistically compared between the two MRA techniques.Results Twenty-two patients of 24 hands successfully underwent NCE-MRA and CE-MRA scan. Among 72 vascular segments, 69 segments of NCE-MRA were diagnostic, which was higher than that of CE-MRA (96% vs 83%,P<0.05). Otherwise, the image quality, SNR, CNR and vessel sharpness of NCE-MRA were all superior to those of CE-MRA (P<0.05).Conclusion NCE-MRA using FSD-prepared SSFP allows clear depiction of the hand arterial tree, and the image quality is superior to that of dynamic CE-MRA. It is a potential tool for evaluating the disease of hand arteries.