医学研究生学报
醫學研究生學報
의학연구생학보
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL POSTGRADUATE
2014年
11期
1139-1142
,共4页
李冬梅%徐丽%张淑珍%张红果
李鼕梅%徐麗%張淑珍%張紅果
리동매%서려%장숙진%장홍과
芍药苷%脑缺血再灌注损伤%超氧化物歧化酶%丙二醛%内皮素%降钙素基因相关肽
芍藥苷%腦缺血再灌註損傷%超氧化物歧化酶%丙二醛%內皮素%降鈣素基因相關肽
작약감%뇌결혈재관주손상%초양화물기화매%병이철%내피소%강개소기인상관태
Paeoniflorin%Cerebral ischemia/reperfusion in-jury%Superoxide dismutase%Malondialdehyde%Endothelin%Calcitonin gene-related peptide
目的:芍药苷是一种潜在的神经保护药。文中探讨芍药苷对沙土鼠脑缺血再灌注( cerebral ischemia/reperfusion, CI/R)损伤的保护作用及其作用机制。方法采用结扎双侧颈总动脉缺血10 min再灌注6 h,建立沙土鼠CI/R模型,随机数表法分为假手术组、模型组以及芍药苷5、10、20 mg/kg组,每组10只,术前3 d开始腹腔注射给药,1次/d,术前30 min给药1次。给药体积均为10 mL/kg,假手术组和模型组给予等体积等渗盐水。观察再灌注6 h内神经症状,计算卒中指数;放射免疫法测定内皮素和降钙素基因相关肽( calcitonin gene-related peptide, CGRP)含量;黄嘌呤氧化酶法测定超氧化物歧化酶( superoxide dis-mutase, SOD)活力,硫代巴比妥酸法测定丙二醛含量。结果芍药苷5、10、20mg /kg组的卒中指数(14.8±3.6、12.3±2.0、12.7±1.4)较模型组(18.4±2.9)均明显降低(P<0.05),而SOD活力[(99.30±9.71)、(106.85±15.13)、(110.25±14.90) nU/mgPro]较模型组[(86.54±10.22)nU/mg Pro]均显著升高(P<0.05);芍药苷10 mg/kg组、芍药苷20 mg/kg组脑组织丙二醛含量[(69.23±8.42)、(65.91±7.64)μmol/mgPro]较模型组[(94.76±10.30)μmol/mgPro]显著降低(P<0.01);芍药苷5、10、20 mg/kg组血浆内皮素水平[(24.06±5.37)、(19.62±5.60)、(21.08±4.64)ng/L]均比模型组[(30.52±7.13)ng/L]明显降低(P<0.05),芍药苷对血浆CGRP水平则无明显影响。结论芍药苷预处理对CI/R损伤有保护作用,其原因与其减少脑组织自由基的产生、抑制脂质过氧化反应、抑制内源性神经肽内皮素的产生等有关。
目的:芍藥苷是一種潛在的神經保護藥。文中探討芍藥苷對沙土鼠腦缺血再灌註( cerebral ischemia/reperfusion, CI/R)損傷的保護作用及其作用機製。方法採用結扎雙側頸總動脈缺血10 min再灌註6 h,建立沙土鼠CI/R模型,隨機數錶法分為假手術組、模型組以及芍藥苷5、10、20 mg/kg組,每組10隻,術前3 d開始腹腔註射給藥,1次/d,術前30 min給藥1次。給藥體積均為10 mL/kg,假手術組和模型組給予等體積等滲鹽水。觀察再灌註6 h內神經癥狀,計算卒中指數;放射免疫法測定內皮素和降鈣素基因相關肽( calcitonin gene-related peptide, CGRP)含量;黃嘌呤氧化酶法測定超氧化物歧化酶( superoxide dis-mutase, SOD)活力,硫代巴比妥痠法測定丙二醛含量。結果芍藥苷5、10、20mg /kg組的卒中指數(14.8±3.6、12.3±2.0、12.7±1.4)較模型組(18.4±2.9)均明顯降低(P<0.05),而SOD活力[(99.30±9.71)、(106.85±15.13)、(110.25±14.90) nU/mgPro]較模型組[(86.54±10.22)nU/mg Pro]均顯著升高(P<0.05);芍藥苷10 mg/kg組、芍藥苷20 mg/kg組腦組織丙二醛含量[(69.23±8.42)、(65.91±7.64)μmol/mgPro]較模型組[(94.76±10.30)μmol/mgPro]顯著降低(P<0.01);芍藥苷5、10、20 mg/kg組血漿內皮素水平[(24.06±5.37)、(19.62±5.60)、(21.08±4.64)ng/L]均比模型組[(30.52±7.13)ng/L]明顯降低(P<0.05),芍藥苷對血漿CGRP水平則無明顯影響。結論芍藥苷預處理對CI/R損傷有保護作用,其原因與其減少腦組織自由基的產生、抑製脂質過氧化反應、抑製內源性神經肽內皮素的產生等有關。
목적:작약감시일충잠재적신경보호약。문중탐토작약감대사토서뇌결혈재관주( cerebral ischemia/reperfusion, CI/R)손상적보호작용급기작용궤제。방법채용결찰쌍측경총동맥결혈10 min재관주6 h,건립사토서CI/R모형,수궤수표법분위가수술조、모형조이급작약감5、10、20 mg/kg조,매조10지,술전3 d개시복강주사급약,1차/d,술전30 min급약1차。급약체적균위10 mL/kg,가수술조화모형조급여등체적등삼염수。관찰재관주6 h내신경증상,계산졸중지수;방사면역법측정내피소화강개소기인상관태( calcitonin gene-related peptide, CGRP)함량;황표령양화매법측정초양화물기화매( superoxide dis-mutase, SOD)활력,류대파비타산법측정병이철함량。결과작약감5、10、20mg /kg조적졸중지수(14.8±3.6、12.3±2.0、12.7±1.4)교모형조(18.4±2.9)균명현강저(P<0.05),이SOD활력[(99.30±9.71)、(106.85±15.13)、(110.25±14.90) nU/mgPro]교모형조[(86.54±10.22)nU/mg Pro]균현저승고(P<0.05);작약감10 mg/kg조、작약감20 mg/kg조뇌조직병이철함량[(69.23±8.42)、(65.91±7.64)μmol/mgPro]교모형조[(94.76±10.30)μmol/mgPro]현저강저(P<0.01);작약감5、10、20 mg/kg조혈장내피소수평[(24.06±5.37)、(19.62±5.60)、(21.08±4.64)ng/L]균비모형조[(30.52±7.13)ng/L]명현강저(P<0.05),작약감대혈장CGRP수평칙무명현영향。결론작약감예처리대CI/R손상유보호작용,기원인여기감소뇌조직자유기적산생、억제지질과양화반응、억제내원성신경태내피소적산생등유관。
Objective Paeoniflorin ( PAE) is a potential neuroprotective agent.In this study, we investigated the protective effect of PAE on cerebral ischemia/reperfusion ( CI/R) injury in gerbils and its underlying mechanisms. Methods The model of CI/R was established in 50 gerbils by bilateral common carotid occlusion for 10 min followed by 6-hour reperfusion.Then the animals were equally randomized into five groups:sham, model, 5 mg/kg PAE, 10 mg/kg PAE, and 20 mg/kg PAE.The latter three groups were treated with intraperitoneal injection of PAE once daily for 3 days before carotid occlusion, while the former two groups with saline only, all at 10 ml/kg.Stroke indexes were calculated during the reperfusion.The contents of endogenous neuropeptides, endothelin and calcitonin gene-related peptide ( CGRP) in the plasma were measured by radioimmunoassay.The levels of superoxide dismutase ( SOD) and malondialdehyde ( MDA) in the brain tissue homogenate were determined by the method of xanthine oxidase. Results The 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg PAE groups showed significantly decreased stroke index (14.8 ±3.6, 12.3 ±2.0, and 12.7 ±1.4) as compared with the model group (18.4 ±2.9) (P<0.05), but remarkably increased SOD activity ([99.30 ±9.71], [106.85 ± 15.13] , and [110.25 ±14.90] vs [86.54 ±10.22] nU/mgPro, P<0.05) .The MDA content was significantly lower in the 10 and 20 mg/kg PAE groups than in the model group ([69.23 ±8.42] and [65.91 ±7.64] vs [94.76 ±10.30] μmol/mgPro, P<0.01). The plasma endothelin level was markedly decreased in all the PAE groups in comparison with the model group ([24.06 ±5.37], [19.62 ±5.60] and [21.08 ±4.64] vs [30.52 ±7.13] ng/L, P<0.05). Conclusion The protective effect of PAE pretreatment in CI/R injury appears to be associated with the inhibition of the brain free radicals, lipid peroxidation and endothelin production.