中国全科医学
中國全科醫學
중국전과의학
CHINESE GENERAL PRACTICE
2014年
36期
4361-4363
,共3页
杨水法%章振保%潘东山%杨恩明
楊水法%章振保%潘東山%楊恩明
양수법%장진보%반동산%양은명
输尿管结石%肾造口术,经皮%腹腔镜检查
輸尿管結石%腎造口術,經皮%腹腔鏡檢查
수뇨관결석%신조구술,경피%복강경검사
Ureteral calculi%Nephrostomy,percutameous%Laparoscopy
目的:对比经皮肾镜碎石取石术( PCNL)和后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术( RLU)治疗单侧输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效。方法选取2006年6月—2013年12月在厦门市第二医院行PCNL或RLU治疗单侧输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的患者153例,PCNL组83例和RLU组70例,对比两组的住院时间、手术时间、术中出血量、术后恢复时间、Ⅰ期清除率及住院费用;并记录两组手术情况。结果 PCNL组和RLU组术中出血量、Ⅰ期清除率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);PCNL组住院时间、手术时间和术后恢复时间均较RLU组短(P<0.05);PCNL组住院费用高于RLU组(P<0.05)。两组均无中转开腹手术。结论两种手术方式治疗单侧输尿管上段嵌顿性结石均安全有效,但PCNL具有住院时间短、手术时间短、术后恢复时间快等优点,值得临床推广。
目的:對比經皮腎鏡碎石取石術( PCNL)和後腹腔鏡輸尿管切開取石術( RLU)治療單側輸尿管上段嵌頓性結石的療效。方法選取2006年6月—2013年12月在廈門市第二醫院行PCNL或RLU治療單側輸尿管上段嵌頓性結石的患者153例,PCNL組83例和RLU組70例,對比兩組的住院時間、手術時間、術中齣血量、術後恢複時間、Ⅰ期清除率及住院費用;併記錄兩組手術情況。結果 PCNL組和RLU組術中齣血量、Ⅰ期清除率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);PCNL組住院時間、手術時間和術後恢複時間均較RLU組短(P<0.05);PCNL組住院費用高于RLU組(P<0.05)。兩組均無中轉開腹手術。結論兩種手術方式治療單側輸尿管上段嵌頓性結石均安全有效,但PCNL具有住院時間短、手術時間短、術後恢複時間快等優點,值得臨床推廣。
목적:대비경피신경쇄석취석술( PCNL)화후복강경수뇨관절개취석술( RLU)치료단측수뇨관상단감돈성결석적료효。방법선취2006년6월—2013년12월재하문시제이의원행PCNL혹RLU치료단측수뇨관상단감돈성결석적환자153례,PCNL조83례화RLU조70례,대비량조적주원시간、수술시간、술중출혈량、술후회복시간、Ⅰ기청제솔급주원비용;병기록량조수술정황。결과 PCNL조화RLU조술중출혈량、Ⅰ기청제솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);PCNL조주원시간、수술시간화술후회복시간균교RLU조단(P<0.05);PCNL조주원비용고우RLU조(P<0.05)。량조균무중전개복수술。결론량충수술방식치료단측수뇨관상단감돈성결석균안전유효,단PCNL구유주원시간단、수술시간단、술후회복시간쾌등우점,치득림상추엄。
Objective To compare the curative effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy( PCNL)and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy( RLU)in the treatment of unilateral incarcerate upper ureteric calculus. Methods 153 cases of u-nilateral incarcerate upper ureteric calculus admitted to the Second Hospital of Hospital from June 2006 to December 2013 were given PCNL or RLU treatment,with 83 cases in the PCNL group and 70 cases in the RLU group. The hospital stay,operation time,intraoperative hemorrhage,postoperative recovery time,stage Ⅰ clearance rate and hospital fees were compared between the two groups. Besides,record surgical cases of two groups. Results The intraoperative hemorrhage and stageⅠclearance rate between the PCNL group and RLU group showed no statistically significant difference(P>0. 05). The hospital stay,operation time and postoperative recovery time of the PCNL group were all shorter than those of the RLU group(P<0. 05),and the hospi-tal fee of the PCNL group was more than that of the RLU group ( P<0. 05 ) . No case in the two groups turned to open opera-tion. Conclusion Both PCNL and RLU are safe and effective in the treatment of unilateral incarcerate upper ureteric calculus. However,PCNL has advantages like shorter hospital stay,operation time and postoperative recovery time,and should be promoted in clinic.