白血病·淋巴瘤
白血病·淋巴瘤
백혈병·림파류
JOURNAL OF LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
2013年
4期
226-229
,共4页
胡小山%宫立众%岑坚%赵德峰%刘毅%尹文杰%沈建良
鬍小山%宮立衆%岑堅%趙德峰%劉毅%尹文傑%瀋建良
호소산%궁립음%잠견%조덕봉%류의%윤문걸%침건량
白血病,髓样,急性%复发%初诊%难治%HAA方案
白血病,髓樣,急性%複髮%初診%難治%HAA方案
백혈병,수양,급성%복발%초진%난치%HAA방안
Leukemia,myeloid,acute%Recurrence%Newly diagnosed%Refractory%HAA regimen
目的 探讨HAA方案诱导治疗初治及复发、难治急性髓系白血病(AML)的疗效和安全性.方法 回顾性分析行HAA方案治疗的66例AML患者的资料,按临床病理因素进行分层分析,观察疗效及不良反应情况.结果 66例患者中初治AML 45例,可评价疗效41例,诱导化疗后36例完全缓解,1例部分缓解,总有效率为90.2%(37/41);难治复发AML 2l例,其中9例获得完全缓解,有效率为42.9%(9/21).HAA方案在性别、年龄、入院时白细胞数目和疾病亚型各分层内缓解率差异无统计学意义(均P> 0.05).14例初治完全缓解病例随访2~19个月,中位随访10个月,持续缓解中位时间为9个月(2~17个月),其中5例(35.7%)巩固化疗期间复发.HAA方案的骨髓抑制中位时间为14d(3~23d).主要不良反应为不同程度的恶心、呕吐[20%(13/66)],腹痛、腹泻[9%(6/66)]及化疗相关感染[53 %(35/66)],未见其他严重的非血液学不良反应.结论 HAA方案对于初治及复发、难治AML均能获得较高的有效率,且安全性较好.
目的 探討HAA方案誘導治療初治及複髮、難治急性髓繫白血病(AML)的療效和安全性.方法 迴顧性分析行HAA方案治療的66例AML患者的資料,按臨床病理因素進行分層分析,觀察療效及不良反應情況.結果 66例患者中初治AML 45例,可評價療效41例,誘導化療後36例完全緩解,1例部分緩解,總有效率為90.2%(37/41);難治複髮AML 2l例,其中9例穫得完全緩解,有效率為42.9%(9/21).HAA方案在性彆、年齡、入院時白細胞數目和疾病亞型各分層內緩解率差異無統計學意義(均P> 0.05).14例初治完全緩解病例隨訪2~19箇月,中位隨訪10箇月,持續緩解中位時間為9箇月(2~17箇月),其中5例(35.7%)鞏固化療期間複髮.HAA方案的骨髓抑製中位時間為14d(3~23d).主要不良反應為不同程度的噁心、嘔吐[20%(13/66)],腹痛、腹瀉[9%(6/66)]及化療相關感染[53 %(35/66)],未見其他嚴重的非血液學不良反應.結論 HAA方案對于初治及複髮、難治AML均能穫得較高的有效率,且安全性較好.
목적 탐토HAA방안유도치료초치급복발、난치급성수계백혈병(AML)적료효화안전성.방법 회고성분석행HAA방안치료적66례AML환자적자료,안림상병리인소진행분층분석,관찰료효급불량반응정황.결과 66례환자중초치AML 45례,가평개료효41례,유도화료후36례완전완해,1례부분완해,총유효솔위90.2%(37/41);난치복발AML 2l례,기중9례획득완전완해,유효솔위42.9%(9/21).HAA방안재성별、년령、입원시백세포수목화질병아형각분층내완해솔차이무통계학의의(균P> 0.05).14례초치완전완해병례수방2~19개월,중위수방10개월,지속완해중위시간위9개월(2~17개월),기중5례(35.7%)공고화료기간복발.HAA방안적골수억제중위시간위14d(3~23d).주요불량반응위불동정도적악심、구토[20%(13/66)],복통、복사[9%(6/66)]급화료상관감염[53 %(35/66)],미견기타엄중적비혈액학불량반응.결론 HAA방안대우초치급복발、난치AML균능획득교고적유효솔,차안전성교호.
Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of HAA induction regimen consisted of homoharringtonine (HHT),cytarabine (Ara-C) and aclacinomycin (ACM) in naive and refractory relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.Methods Data from 66 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases hospitalized and treated with HAA induction regimen was analyzed retrospectively.Results 45 of the 66 cases suffered from naive AML,and 21 were refractory relapsed.HAA efficacy in naive AML was evaluated in 41 cases with 36 in complete remission (CR) and 1 in partial remission (PR).The efficiency of HAA induction regimen was 90.2 % (37/41)in naive AML group and 42.9 % (9/21) in refractory relapsed group,respectively.There were no differences (P > 0.05) when considering patient' s gender,age,disease subtype and white blood cell count at onset.14 patients in CR with naive AML were followed-up for a median time of 9 months (2-17 months),and 5 cases relapsed (35.7 %) in a range of 2-8 months.The median myelosuppression period was 14 days (3-23 days).Nausea and vomiting [20 % (13/66)] were the major side effects of HAA regimen,and the other side effects were abdominal pain and diarrhea [9 % (6/66).After chemotherapy,53 % (35/66) of the cases experienced infection/fever due to neutropenia.Other severe non-hematological side effects did not occur.Conclusion HAA regimen may be an ideal choice for the induction chemotherapy of naive and relapsed refractory AML.