国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2012年
23期
3406-3408
,共3页
林瑞杰%陈德玲%郭谷生%陈炳贵%陈伟健
林瑞傑%陳德玲%郭穀生%陳炳貴%陳偉健
림서걸%진덕령%곽곡생%진병귀%진위건
额颞叶脑内血肿%脑疝%标准外伤大骨瓣%预后
額顳葉腦內血腫%腦疝%標準外傷大骨瓣%預後
액섭협뇌내혈종%뇌산%표준외상대골판%예후
Frontotemporal intracerebral hematoma%Cerebral hernia%Standard large decompressive craniotomy%Prognosis
目的 比较标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术去除颞骨及额骨与去除颞骨保留额骨治疗额颞叶脑内血肿并发脑疝患者的效果.方法 选取我院收治的73例额颞叶脑内血肿并发脑疝患者,将其随机分为对照组33例和观察组40例;对照组采用标准大骨瓣开颅减压术(去除颞骨及额骨),观察组采用标准大骨瓣开颅减压术(去除颞骨保留额骨),对两组的减压效果、预后、住院满意度等进行比较,统计分析所得数据.结果 观察组术后减压有效率85.0%,预后有效率87.8%,略优于对照组的84.8%、87.5%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但观察组住院患者满意度高于对照组(92.50% vs.81.82%),费用低于对照组.结论 在额颞叶脑内血肿并发脑疝患者手术中,采用去除颞骨保留额骨的手术方法,疗效佳,预后好,后期治疗费用低廉,能有效减轻患者创伤和经济负担,提高住院患者满意度,值得在基层医院临床上推广.
目的 比較標準外傷大骨瓣開顱術去除顳骨及額骨與去除顳骨保留額骨治療額顳葉腦內血腫併髮腦疝患者的效果.方法 選取我院收治的73例額顳葉腦內血腫併髮腦疝患者,將其隨機分為對照組33例和觀察組40例;對照組採用標準大骨瓣開顱減壓術(去除顳骨及額骨),觀察組採用標準大骨瓣開顱減壓術(去除顳骨保留額骨),對兩組的減壓效果、預後、住院滿意度等進行比較,統計分析所得數據.結果 觀察組術後減壓有效率85.0%,預後有效率87.8%,略優于對照組的84.8%、87.5%,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);但觀察組住院患者滿意度高于對照組(92.50% vs.81.82%),費用低于對照組.結論 在額顳葉腦內血腫併髮腦疝患者手術中,採用去除顳骨保留額骨的手術方法,療效佳,預後好,後期治療費用低廉,能有效減輕患者創傷和經濟負擔,提高住院患者滿意度,值得在基層醫院臨床上推廣.
목적 비교표준외상대골판개로술거제섭골급액골여거제섭골보류액골치료액섭협뇌내혈종병발뇌산환자적효과.방법 선취아원수치적73례액섭협뇌내혈종병발뇌산환자,장기수궤분위대조조33례화관찰조40례;대조조채용표준대골판개로감압술(거제섭골급액골),관찰조채용표준대골판개로감압술(거제섭골보류액골),대량조적감압효과、예후、주원만의도등진행비교,통계분석소득수거.결과 관찰조술후감압유효솔85.0%,예후유효솔87.8%,략우우대조조적84.8%、87.5%,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);단관찰조주원환자만의도고우대조조(92.50% vs.81.82%),비용저우대조조.결론 재액섭협뇌내혈종병발뇌산환자수술중,채용거제섭골보류액골적수술방법,료효가,예후호,후기치료비용저렴,능유효감경환자창상화경제부담,제고주원환자만의도,치득재기층의원림상상추엄.
Objective To compare the efficacy of removal with presevation of the frontal bone in standard large decompressive craniotomy for frontotemporal intracerebral hematoma complicated with brain hernia.Methods 73 patients with frontotemporal intracerebral hematoma complicated with cerebral hernia were randomly divided into control group (33 patients,removal of the temporal bone and the frontal bone) and study group (40 patients,removal of the temporal bone with presevation of the frontal bone).The decompression effect,prognosis,and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups and the data were analyzed statistically.Results The study group was slightly superior to the control group in decompression efficacy and prognosis (85.0% vs.84.8% and 87.8% vs.87.5%),with a no significant statistical difference (P> 0.05).The rate of patient satisfaction was higher in the study group than in the control group (92.50% vs.81.82%).The medical costs were lower in the study group.Conclusions Removal of the temporal bone with presevation of the frontal bone in standard large decompressive craniotomy for frontotemporal intracerebral hematoma complicated with brain hernia is efficacious and less invasive and has better prognosis,fewer medical costs,and higher patient satisfaction degree.Thus it is worth popularizing in primary hospitals.