国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2013年
20期
3101-3104
,共4页
杨惜珍%陈春红%吴树跃%高镇松
楊惜珍%陳春紅%吳樹躍%高鎮鬆
양석진%진춘홍%오수약%고진송
独生子女%精神分裂症%个性化护理%健康教育%对照研究
獨生子女%精神分裂癥%箇性化護理%健康教育%對照研究
독생자녀%정신분렬증%개성화호리%건강교육%대조연구
The only-child%Schizophrenia%Personalized nursing%Health education%Control study
目的 探讨个性化护理对独生子女精神分裂症患者的康复效应.方法 以住院独生子女精神分裂症患者为对象,随机分为两组,研究组32例实施个性化护理和系统化健康教育,对照组31例实施常规护理和一般健康教育.结果 干预后研究组的治疗依从性、护理依从性、检查配合度、活动参与度均显著好于对照组(P<0.05);干预后研究组的BPRS总分及缺乏活力、激活性因子分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);干预后研究组阳性症状、情感症状、认知症状的检出率均显著低于对照组(9.4% vs 29.0%,3.1% vs 19.4%,6.3% vs 25.8%,均P<0.05).结论 充分考虑独生子女患者不同的症状特点和个性特征,采取相应的个性化护理措施可取得较好的成效.
目的 探討箇性化護理對獨生子女精神分裂癥患者的康複效應.方法 以住院獨生子女精神分裂癥患者為對象,隨機分為兩組,研究組32例實施箇性化護理和繫統化健康教育,對照組31例實施常規護理和一般健康教育.結果 榦預後研究組的治療依從性、護理依從性、檢查配閤度、活動參與度均顯著好于對照組(P<0.05);榦預後研究組的BPRS總分及缺乏活力、激活性因子分均顯著低于對照組(P<0.05);榦預後研究組暘性癥狀、情感癥狀、認知癥狀的檢齣率均顯著低于對照組(9.4% vs 29.0%,3.1% vs 19.4%,6.3% vs 25.8%,均P<0.05).結論 充分攷慮獨生子女患者不同的癥狀特點和箇性特徵,採取相應的箇性化護理措施可取得較好的成效.
목적 탐토개성화호리대독생자녀정신분렬증환자적강복효응.방법 이주원독생자녀정신분렬증환자위대상,수궤분위량조,연구조32례실시개성화호리화계통화건강교육,대조조31례실시상규호리화일반건강교육.결과 간예후연구조적치료의종성、호리의종성、검사배합도、활동삼여도균현저호우대조조(P<0.05);간예후연구조적BPRS총분급결핍활력、격활성인자분균현저저우대조조(P<0.05);간예후연구조양성증상、정감증상、인지증상적검출솔균현저저우대조조(9.4% vs 29.0%,3.1% vs 19.4%,6.3% vs 25.8%,균P<0.05).결론 충분고필독생자녀환자불동적증상특점화개성특정,채취상응적개성화호리조시가취득교호적성효.
Objective To explore the rehabilitation effects of the personalized nursing for the only-child with schizophrenia.Methods The subjects were the only-child with schizophrenia.They were randomly divided into two groups.The study group (n=32) was performed with personalized nursing and systematic health educations.The control group (n=31) was given routine nursing and general health educations.Results Before interventions,there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).But after intervention,the study group showed significantly better than the control group in the treatment dependence,nursing dependence,check cooperation and participate in activities (P < 0.05).The total score of BPRS and factor scores of lack vitality and activation showed significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (P < 0.05).After intervention,the incidences of positive,affection and cognition symptoms were 9.4%,3.1% and 6.3% of the study group respectively,which were significantly lower than those of the control group (29.0%,19.4%,25.8%,respectively,P < 0.05).Conclusion Based on adequate consideration to the different symptoms and personality of the only-child,the personalized nursing measures have better effects.