国际内分泌代谢杂志
國際內分泌代謝雜誌
국제내분비대사잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
2013年
5期
357-360
,共4页
刘艳%韩颖%石节丽%金娜娜%李瑞霞%李素芬%徐福娟%龙雪%高鹏飞
劉豔%韓穎%石節麗%金娜娜%李瑞霞%李素芬%徐福娟%龍雪%高鵬飛
류염%한영%석절려%금나나%리서하%리소분%서복연%룡설%고붕비
完全膳食替代%部分膳食替代%超重%2型糖尿病%生活质量
完全膳食替代%部分膳食替代%超重%2型糖尿病%生活質量
완전선식체대%부분선식체대%초중%2형당뇨병%생활질량
Complete meal replacement%Partial meal replacement%Overweight%Type 2 diabetes mellitus%Quality of life
目的 探讨部分膳食替代(PMR)和完全膳食替代(CMR)对超重2型糖尿病患者血糖控制及生活质量的影响.方法 以在天津市大港油田总医院糖尿病科门诊就诊的超重2型糖尿病患者60例作为研究对象,按照随机数字法分为对照组、CMR组和PMR组,干预3个月.CMR组每天采用特殊膳食完全替代早餐,PMR组每天3餐前服用少量特殊膳食,并适当减少正餐量.采用酶比色法检测HbAl c,计算稳态模型评估-胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)、体重指数,通过问卷调查了解糖尿病痛苦情况及生活质量.结果 研究结束后,与对照组相比,CMR组和PMR组HbA1c[(7.6±0.7)%比(8.2±0.8)%,(7.7±0.4)%比(8.2±0.8)%]、HOMA-IR[(4.3±1.2)比(6.0±2.0),(4.7±1.4)比(6.0±0.2)]均明显降低(P均<0.05).PMR组与CMR组相比,在改善糖尿病痛苦[(25.9±2.8)比(27.7±2.4)]及生活质量[(73.8±4.1)比(70.2±4.2)]方面具有明显的优势(P均< 0.05).结论 PMR在改善糖、脂代谢的效果与CMR相当,但PMR更有利于减轻尿病患者的心理压力,提高其生活质量.
目的 探討部分膳食替代(PMR)和完全膳食替代(CMR)對超重2型糖尿病患者血糖控製及生活質量的影響.方法 以在天津市大港油田總醫院糖尿病科門診就診的超重2型糖尿病患者60例作為研究對象,按照隨機數字法分為對照組、CMR組和PMR組,榦預3箇月.CMR組每天採用特殊膳食完全替代早餐,PMR組每天3餐前服用少量特殊膳食,併適噹減少正餐量.採用酶比色法檢測HbAl c,計算穩態模型評估-胰島素牴抗指數(HOMA-IR)、體重指數,通過問捲調查瞭解糖尿病痛苦情況及生活質量.結果 研究結束後,與對照組相比,CMR組和PMR組HbA1c[(7.6±0.7)%比(8.2±0.8)%,(7.7±0.4)%比(8.2±0.8)%]、HOMA-IR[(4.3±1.2)比(6.0±2.0),(4.7±1.4)比(6.0±0.2)]均明顯降低(P均<0.05).PMR組與CMR組相比,在改善糖尿病痛苦[(25.9±2.8)比(27.7±2.4)]及生活質量[(73.8±4.1)比(70.2±4.2)]方麵具有明顯的優勢(P均< 0.05).結論 PMR在改善糖、脂代謝的效果與CMR相噹,但PMR更有利于減輕尿病患者的心理壓力,提高其生活質量.
목적 탐토부분선식체대(PMR)화완전선식체대(CMR)대초중2형당뇨병환자혈당공제급생활질량적영향.방법 이재천진시대항유전총의원당뇨병과문진취진적초중2형당뇨병환자60례작위연구대상,안조수궤수자법분위대조조、CMR조화PMR조,간예3개월.CMR조매천채용특수선식완전체대조찬,PMR조매천3찬전복용소량특수선식,병괄당감소정찬량.채용매비색법검측HbAl c,계산은태모형평고-이도소저항지수(HOMA-IR)、체중지수,통과문권조사료해당뇨병통고정황급생활질량.결과 연구결속후,여대조조상비,CMR조화PMR조HbA1c[(7.6±0.7)%비(8.2±0.8)%,(7.7±0.4)%비(8.2±0.8)%]、HOMA-IR[(4.3±1.2)비(6.0±2.0),(4.7±1.4)비(6.0±0.2)]균명현강저(P균<0.05).PMR조여CMR조상비,재개선당뇨병통고[(25.9±2.8)비(27.7±2.4)]급생활질량[(73.8±4.1)비(70.2±4.2)]방면구유명현적우세(P균< 0.05).결론 PMR재개선당、지대사적효과여CMR상당,단PMR경유리우감경뇨병환자적심리압력,제고기생활질량.
Objective To test effects of partial meal replacement (PMR and complete meal replacement(CMR) on glycemic control and quality of life in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods Outpatients with type 2 diabetes and overweight were screened in department of diabetes,general hospital of Tianjin dagang oilfield.Finally,60 cases were in the study.The subjects were divided into control group,CMR group and PMR group to receive intervention for three months according to method of random number.Special dietary completely replaced daily breakfast in CMR group,while in PMR group,a small amount of special dietary was taken before three meals a day,and daily meals were reduced,appropriately.HbA1c was examined by enzymatic colorimetric.Homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMAIR) and body mass index were assessed.Diabetes-related distress and quality of life were conducted by questionnaires.Results At the end of the study,CMR group showed statistically differences in glycemic control [(7.6 ± 0.7) % vs.(8.2 ± 0.8) %] and HOMA-IR [(4.3 ± 1.2) vs.(6.0 ± 0.2)],compared with control group(all P < 0.05),the same as PMR group compared to control group [(7.7 ± 0.4) % vs.(8.2 ±0.8)%,P <0.05;(4.7 ± 1.4) vs.(6.0 ±0.2),P <0.05] ; Compared with CMR group,the effects of PMR group on reducing diabetes-related distress and improving quality of life were significant [(25.9 ± 2.8) vs.(27.7±2.4),P<0.05;(73.8±4.1) vs.(70.2 ±4.2),P<0.05).Conclusion The effects of PMR on improving glycemic and lipid control showed no obvious advantage relative to CMR,while it was priority to reduce diabetes-related emotional stress and improve quality of life in diabetic patients.