中华急诊医学杂志
中華急診醫學雜誌
중화급진의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
2013年
6期
622-625
,共4页
周平%董云%王建东%陈友岱%章晓红%李依%邓磊%冯旋璘%苏明华
週平%董雲%王建東%陳友岱%章曉紅%李依%鄧磊%馮鏇璘%囌明華
주평%동운%왕건동%진우대%장효홍%리의%산뢰%풍선린%소명화
脑电双频指数%心肺复苏%预后
腦電雙頻指數%心肺複囌%預後
뇌전쌍빈지수%심폐복소%예후
Bispectral index%Cardiopulmonary resuscitation%Prognosis
目的 探讨脑电双频指数(BIS)监测在评估心肺复苏后患者预后的意义.方法 选择32例心肺复苏后72 h仍然昏迷的患者,行BIS监测,并行格拉斯哥评分(GCS)及急性生理及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHEⅡ),将BIS值与GCS评分、APACHEⅡ评分进行相关性分析.将患者分为2组:预后良好组(n=7);预后不良组(n=25),比较两组的BIS值、GCS评分、APACHEⅡ评分.计算BIS的曲线下面积及对预后判断的截点.结果 本组患者30 d存活率31.25%.BIS值与GCS评分呈明显正相关(r=0.707,P=0.000);预后良好组与预后不良组的BIS值比较,差异具有统计学意义(P =0.000).BIS曲线下面积为0.943,当BIS≤60时,其预测心肺复苏后患者发生预后不良的敏感度为100%;特异度为88%.结论 BIS监测可作为心肺复苏后患者预后评估的一个指标.
目的 探討腦電雙頻指數(BIS)鑑測在評估心肺複囌後患者預後的意義.方法 選擇32例心肺複囌後72 h仍然昏迷的患者,行BIS鑑測,併行格拉斯哥評分(GCS)及急性生理及慢性健康狀況評分繫統(APACHEⅡ),將BIS值與GCS評分、APACHEⅡ評分進行相關性分析.將患者分為2組:預後良好組(n=7);預後不良組(n=25),比較兩組的BIS值、GCS評分、APACHEⅡ評分.計算BIS的麯線下麵積及對預後判斷的截點.結果 本組患者30 d存活率31.25%.BIS值與GCS評分呈明顯正相關(r=0.707,P=0.000);預後良好組與預後不良組的BIS值比較,差異具有統計學意義(P =0.000).BIS麯線下麵積為0.943,噹BIS≤60時,其預測心肺複囌後患者髮生預後不良的敏感度為100%;特異度為88%.結論 BIS鑑測可作為心肺複囌後患者預後評估的一箇指標.
목적 탐토뇌전쌍빈지수(BIS)감측재평고심폐복소후환자예후적의의.방법 선택32례심폐복소후72 h잉연혼미적환자,행BIS감측,병행격랍사가평분(GCS)급급성생리급만성건강상황평분계통(APACHEⅡ),장BIS치여GCS평분、APACHEⅡ평분진행상관성분석.장환자분위2조:예후량호조(n=7);예후불량조(n=25),비교량조적BIS치、GCS평분、APACHEⅡ평분.계산BIS적곡선하면적급대예후판단적절점.결과 본조환자30 d존활솔31.25%.BIS치여GCS평분정명현정상관(r=0.707,P=0.000);예후량호조여예후불량조적BIS치비교,차이구유통계학의의(P =0.000).BIS곡선하면적위0.943,당BIS≤60시,기예측심폐복소후환자발생예후불량적민감도위100%;특이도위88%.결론 BIS감측가작위심폐복소후환자예후평고적일개지표.
Objective To study the value of bispectral index (BIS) in predicting the prognosis of patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).Methods Thirty-two coma patients 72 hours after CPR were enrolled for study with monitoring the changes of BIS,glasgow coma scale (GCS) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring system (APACHE Ⅱ),and subsequently the monitored data were documented and analyzed.The patients were divided into 2 groups:good prognosis group (n =7)and poor prognosis group (n =25),and comparisons of BIS,GCS and APACHE Ⅱ were made between two groups.The area under the curve (ROC,AUC) of BIS and the intercept point for assessing prognosis were calculated.Results The 30-day survival rate in this study was 31.25 %.The positive correlation between the values of BIS and GCS were obvious (r =0.707,P =0.000).Comparison of BIS between two groups showed difference was statistically significance (P =0.000).The area under the ROC of BIS was 0.943.When BIS ≤ 60,the sensitivity of predicting poor prognosis of patients after CPR was 100% ; the specificity was 88%.Conclusions BIS monitoring could be a high sensitive indicator of evaluating prognosis of patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.