中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2013年
6期
651-653
,共3页
谭文辉%张秀%吴丹%谢杨新%张柳%陈茜%张宇
譚文輝%張秀%吳丹%謝楊新%張柳%陳茜%張宇
담문휘%장수%오단%사양신%장류%진천%장우
临床路径%猩红热%护理
臨床路徑%猩紅熱%護理
림상로경%성홍열%호리
Clinical way%Scarlet fever%Nursing
目的 探讨临床路径在猩红热患者诊疗护理中的应用效果.方法 选择2010年4月至2012年6月收治的猩红热患者60例为观察组,采用临床路径的工作流程进行诊疗护理;抽取2008年10月至2010年3月采用传统的工作流程进行诊疗护理的猩红热患者49例为对照组,比较两组在住院日、住院费用、患者满意度及健康教育知识认知方面的差异.结果 观察组平均住院费用(758.2±41.2)元,对照组(1248.3±298.3)元,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.40,P<0.05);观察组患者健康教育知识知晓率(100.0%)高于对照组的(89.9%),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(x2 =4.30;P <0.05);两组平均住院日及患者满意度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 临床路径的应用,提高了患者及家属对猩红热疾病健康知识的认知及患者满意度,降低了住院费用.
目的 探討臨床路徑在猩紅熱患者診療護理中的應用效果.方法 選擇2010年4月至2012年6月收治的猩紅熱患者60例為觀察組,採用臨床路徑的工作流程進行診療護理;抽取2008年10月至2010年3月採用傳統的工作流程進行診療護理的猩紅熱患者49例為對照組,比較兩組在住院日、住院費用、患者滿意度及健康教育知識認知方麵的差異.結果 觀察組平均住院費用(758.2±41.2)元,對照組(1248.3±298.3)元,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(t=2.40,P<0.05);觀察組患者健康教育知識知曉率(100.0%)高于對照組的(89.9%),兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(x2 =4.30;P <0.05);兩組平均住院日及患者滿意度比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 臨床路徑的應用,提高瞭患者及傢屬對猩紅熱疾病健康知識的認知及患者滿意度,降低瞭住院費用.
목적 탐토림상로경재성홍열환자진료호리중적응용효과.방법 선택2010년4월지2012년6월수치적성홍열환자60례위관찰조,채용림상로경적공작류정진행진료호리;추취2008년10월지2010년3월채용전통적공작류정진행진료호리적성홍열환자49례위대조조,비교량조재주원일、주원비용、환자만의도급건강교육지식인지방면적차이.결과 관찰조평균주원비용(758.2±41.2)원,대조조(1248.3±298.3)원,량조비교차이유통계학의의(t=2.40,P<0.05);관찰조환자건강교육지식지효솔(100.0%)고우대조조적(89.9%),량조비교,차이유통계학의의(x2 =4.30;P <0.05);량조평균주원일급환자만의도비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 림상로경적응용,제고료환자급가속대성홍열질병건강지식적인지급환자만의도,강저료주원비용.
Objective To study the application effect of clinical pathway in treating and nursing patients with scarlet fever.Methods Scarlet fever patients admitted from April 2010 to June 2012 in Military Hospital were the observation group,receiving treated and nursed with clinical pathway,while patients from October 2008 to March 2010 were the control group,receiving treatment and nursing with traditional procedure.Duration and expense of hospitalization,patients' satisfaction and health knowledge were compared between two groups.Results The average expense of hospitalization [(758.2 ±41.2)Yuan],awareness of health knowledge (100%) in the observation group were remarkably improved compared with the control group [(1 248.3 ±298.3)Yuan,89.9%] (t =2.40,x2 =4.30;P < 0.05).There was no significant difference in average duration of hospitalization between two groups (P >0.05).Patients' satisfaction rate increased from 91.8% to 98.3%,there was no any statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).Conclusions Application of clinical pathway can reduce the expense of hospitalization,improve health knowledge of both patients and families,as well as their rate of satisfaction.