中华消化外科杂志
中華消化外科雜誌
중화소화외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY
2013年
5期
362-365
,共4页
王道荣%李清国%汤东%陈杰%李萍
王道榮%李清國%湯東%陳傑%李萍
왕도영%리청국%탕동%진걸%리평
直肠肿瘤%腹腔镜检查%回肠造瘘
直腸腫瘤%腹腔鏡檢查%迴腸造瘺
직장종류%복강경검사%회장조루
Rectal neoplasms%Laparoscopy%Ileostomy
目的 探讨腹腔镜低位和超低位直肠癌保肛根治术中预防性使用改良襻式回肠末端造瘘的临床应用价值.方法 回顾性分析2010年1月至2012年6月江苏省苏北人民医院收治的108例直肠癌患者的临床资料.所有患者采用腹腔镜低位或超低位直肠癌保肛根治术,其中53例采用预防性改良襻式回肠末端造瘘(预造瘘组),55例未采用预防性改良襻式回肠末端造瘘(未造瘘组).对两组患者术中和术后情况进行比较研究.计量资料采用(x-)±s表示,组间比较采用t检验;计数资料采用率或构成比表示,组间比较采用x2检验或Fisher确切概率法.结果 预造瘘组和未造瘘组患者手术时间分别为(185±14)min和(154±12) min,术中出血量分别为(31±26)ml和(28±19)ml,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(=2.34,1.82,P>0.05);术后肛门排气时间分别为(1.1±0.3)d和(4.2±0.6)d,术后进食时间分别为(1.1±0.2)d和(4.3±0.6)d,盆腔引流管拔出时间分别为(5.2±1.0)d和(8.4±3.9)d,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=7.25,28.12,15.34,P<0.05);并发症发生率分别为5.7%(3/53)和21.8% (12/55),吻合口瘘发生率分别为0和12.7% (7/55),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后住院时间分别为(7.2±1.4)d和(12.9 ±4.4)d,治疗费用分别为(3.0±0.2)万元和(3.8±0.7)万元,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=34.01,7.83,P<0.05).结论 对腹腔镜低位和超低位直肠癌保肛根治术患者施行预防性改良襻式回肠末端造瘘,能有效降低吻合口瘘的发生,有利于患者快速康复.
目的 探討腹腔鏡低位和超低位直腸癌保肛根治術中預防性使用改良襻式迴腸末耑造瘺的臨床應用價值.方法 迴顧性分析2010年1月至2012年6月江囌省囌北人民醫院收治的108例直腸癌患者的臨床資料.所有患者採用腹腔鏡低位或超低位直腸癌保肛根治術,其中53例採用預防性改良襻式迴腸末耑造瘺(預造瘺組),55例未採用預防性改良襻式迴腸末耑造瘺(未造瘺組).對兩組患者術中和術後情況進行比較研究.計量資料採用(x-)±s錶示,組間比較採用t檢驗;計數資料採用率或構成比錶示,組間比較採用x2檢驗或Fisher確切概率法.結果 預造瘺組和未造瘺組患者手術時間分彆為(185±14)min和(154±12) min,術中齣血量分彆為(31±26)ml和(28±19)ml,兩組比較,差異無統計學意義(=2.34,1.82,P>0.05);術後肛門排氣時間分彆為(1.1±0.3)d和(4.2±0.6)d,術後進食時間分彆為(1.1±0.2)d和(4.3±0.6)d,盆腔引流管拔齣時間分彆為(5.2±1.0)d和(8.4±3.9)d,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(t=7.25,28.12,15.34,P<0.05);併髮癥髮生率分彆為5.7%(3/53)和21.8% (12/55),吻閤口瘺髮生率分彆為0和12.7% (7/55),兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);術後住院時間分彆為(7.2±1.4)d和(12.9 ±4.4)d,治療費用分彆為(3.0±0.2)萬元和(3.8±0.7)萬元,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(t=34.01,7.83,P<0.05).結論 對腹腔鏡低位和超低位直腸癌保肛根治術患者施行預防性改良襻式迴腸末耑造瘺,能有效降低吻閤口瘺的髮生,有利于患者快速康複.
목적 탐토복강경저위화초저위직장암보항근치술중예방성사용개량반식회장말단조루적림상응용개치.방법 회고성분석2010년1월지2012년6월강소성소북인민의원수치적108례직장암환자적림상자료.소유환자채용복강경저위혹초저위직장암보항근치술,기중53례채용예방성개량반식회장말단조루(예조루조),55례미채용예방성개량반식회장말단조루(미조루조).대량조환자술중화술후정황진행비교연구.계량자료채용(x-)±s표시,조간비교채용t검험;계수자료채용솔혹구성비표시,조간비교채용x2검험혹Fisher학절개솔법.결과 예조루조화미조루조환자수술시간분별위(185±14)min화(154±12) min,술중출혈량분별위(31±26)ml화(28±19)ml,량조비교,차이무통계학의의(=2.34,1.82,P>0.05);술후항문배기시간분별위(1.1±0.3)d화(4.2±0.6)d,술후진식시간분별위(1.1±0.2)d화(4.3±0.6)d,분강인류관발출시간분별위(5.2±1.0)d화(8.4±3.9)d,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(t=7.25,28.12,15.34,P<0.05);병발증발생솔분별위5.7%(3/53)화21.8% (12/55),문합구루발생솔분별위0화12.7% (7/55),량조비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);술후주원시간분별위(7.2±1.4)d화(12.9 ±4.4)d,치료비용분별위(3.0±0.2)만원화(3.8±0.7)만원,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(t=34.01,7.83,P<0.05).결론 대복강경저위화초저위직장암보항근치술환자시행예방성개량반식회장말단조루,능유효강저문합구루적발생,유리우환자쾌속강복.
Objective To investigate the value of modified loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low and superlow radical resection of the rectal cancer with reservation of anus.Methods The clinical data of 108 patients who received laparoscopic low and super-low radical resection of rectal cancer with preservation of anus at the Subei Hospital of Jiangsu Province from January 2010 to June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.Fifty-three patients who received preventive ileostomy were in the ileostomy group,and 55 patients who did not receive preventive ileostomy were in the non-ileostomy group.The operation,incidence of complication and follow-up of the 2 groups were analyzed.All data were analyzed using the t test,chi-square text or Fisher exact test.Results The operation time and blood loss were (185 ± 14)minutes and (31 ± 26)ml in the ileostomy group,and (154 ± 12)minutes and (28 ± 19)ml in the non-ileostomy group,with no significant difference between the 2 groups (t =2.34,1.82,P > 0.05).The time to first flatus,time to liquid diet intake,time to pelvic drainage tube removal,duration of hospital stay,hospital costs were (1.1 ± 0.3) days,(1.1 ± 0.2) days,(5.2 ± 1.0) days,(7.2 ± 1.4) days,(3.0 ± 0.2) ×104 yuan in the ileostomy group,and (4.2 ± 0.6) days,(4.3 ± 0.6) days,(8.4 ± 3.9) days,(12.9 ±4.4)days,(3.8 ±0.7) × 104 yuan in the non-ileostomy group,with significant differences between the 2 groups (t =7.25,28.12,15.34,34.01,7.83,P < 0.05).The incidences of postoperative complications and anastomotic fistula were 5.7% (3/53) and 0 in the ileostomy group,and 21.8% (12/55) and 12.7% (7/55) in the non-ileostomy group,with significant differences between the 2 groups (P < 0.05).Conclusion Modified loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low and super-low radical resection of rectal cancer can effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula,and helps the recovery of patients.