中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志
中華眼視光學與視覺科學雜誌
중화안시광학여시각과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY OPHTHALMOLOGY AND VISUAL SCIENCE
2014年
7期
421-425
,共5页
唐静%邱乐梅%张小兰%孙成淑%王顺清%邓应平
唐靜%邱樂梅%張小蘭%孫成淑%王順清%鄧應平
당정%구악매%장소란%손성숙%왕순청%산응평
飞秒激光%飞秒激光小切口基质透镜取出术%角膜磨镶术,前弹力层下%眩光指数%调制传递函数截止频率%视觉质量
飛秒激光%飛秒激光小切口基質透鏡取齣術%角膜磨鑲術,前彈力層下%眩光指數%調製傳遞函數截止頻率%視覺質量
비초격광%비초격광소절구기질투경취출술%각막마양술,전탄력층하%현광지수%조제전체함수절지빈솔%시각질량
Femtosecond laser%Small incision lenticule extraction%Keratomileusis,sub-Bowman%Opposite sector index%Modulation transfer function cut-off%Visual quality
目的 分析飞秒制瓣SBK (FS-SBK)、SBK和SMILE 3种术式矫正近视后的眩光指数和视觉质量参数的变化,评估3种手术在不同屈光度范围内对视觉质量的影响.方法 前瞻性病例对照研究.收集2013年8-10月行近视矫正手术的122例(122眼),根据患者选择的手术方式分别行FS-SBK(26例)、SBK(48例)和SMILE(48例)手术,并根据屈光度分为高、中、低度近视组.使用OQAS视觉质量分析系统、采集手术前和术后1 d、1周、1个月时复查的眩光指数(OSI)和调制传递函数截止频率(MTF cut-off),采用方差分析评价在不同屈光度组施行不同手术方式对OSI和MTF cut-off值变化的影响.结果 手术方式对术后视觉质量的影响:①视力:术后视力较术前明显提高,3种手术在各时间点组间比较差异均无统计学意义.②OSI值:SBK和FS-SBK组手术前后差异均无统计学意义.SMILE低度组术后OSI与术前比较,差异无统计学意义,中、高度组术后OSI升高,术后与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(F=8.316、8.789,P<0.01).③MTF cut-off值:FS-SBK组手术前后差异无统计学意义.SBK组和SMILE组中度近视术后1周与术前、术后1个月差异有统计学意义(F=4.469,P<0.05).屈光度对术后视觉质量的影响:高、中、低度近视组内,术前和术后各时间点3种手术方式之间差异无统计学意义.结论 3种屈光手术术后视力明显提高,术式对术后视力影响不显著.中、高度近视SMILE术后眩光指数升高,因此准分子激光切削对减少眩光比SMILE有优势.视觉质量参数MTF cut-off在FS-SBK手术前后变化不显著,而SBK和SMILE术后较术前有下降,在1周时明显,到1个月时上升,且基本接近术前水平,这种优势在中度近视较突出.
目的 分析飛秒製瓣SBK (FS-SBK)、SBK和SMILE 3種術式矯正近視後的眩光指數和視覺質量參數的變化,評估3種手術在不同屈光度範圍內對視覺質量的影響.方法 前瞻性病例對照研究.收集2013年8-10月行近視矯正手術的122例(122眼),根據患者選擇的手術方式分彆行FS-SBK(26例)、SBK(48例)和SMILE(48例)手術,併根據屈光度分為高、中、低度近視組.使用OQAS視覺質量分析繫統、採集手術前和術後1 d、1週、1箇月時複查的眩光指數(OSI)和調製傳遞函數截止頻率(MTF cut-off),採用方差分析評價在不同屈光度組施行不同手術方式對OSI和MTF cut-off值變化的影響.結果 手術方式對術後視覺質量的影響:①視力:術後視力較術前明顯提高,3種手術在各時間點組間比較差異均無統計學意義.②OSI值:SBK和FS-SBK組手術前後差異均無統計學意義.SMILE低度組術後OSI與術前比較,差異無統計學意義,中、高度組術後OSI升高,術後與術前比較,差異有統計學意義(F=8.316、8.789,P<0.01).③MTF cut-off值:FS-SBK組手術前後差異無統計學意義.SBK組和SMILE組中度近視術後1週與術前、術後1箇月差異有統計學意義(F=4.469,P<0.05).屈光度對術後視覺質量的影響:高、中、低度近視組內,術前和術後各時間點3種手術方式之間差異無統計學意義.結論 3種屈光手術術後視力明顯提高,術式對術後視力影響不顯著.中、高度近視SMILE術後眩光指數升高,因此準分子激光切削對減少眩光比SMILE有優勢.視覺質量參數MTF cut-off在FS-SBK手術前後變化不顯著,而SBK和SMILE術後較術前有下降,在1週時明顯,到1箇月時上升,且基本接近術前水平,這種優勢在中度近視較突齣.
목적 분석비초제판SBK (FS-SBK)、SBK화SMILE 3충술식교정근시후적현광지수화시각질량삼수적변화,평고3충수술재불동굴광도범위내대시각질량적영향.방법 전첨성병례대조연구.수집2013년8-10월행근시교정수술적122례(122안),근거환자선택적수술방식분별행FS-SBK(26례)、SBK(48례)화SMILE(48례)수술,병근거굴광도분위고、중、저도근시조.사용OQAS시각질량분석계통、채집수술전화술후1 d、1주、1개월시복사적현광지수(OSI)화조제전체함수절지빈솔(MTF cut-off),채용방차분석평개재불동굴광도조시행불동수술방식대OSI화MTF cut-off치변화적영향.결과 수술방식대술후시각질량적영향:①시력:술후시력교술전명현제고,3충수술재각시간점조간비교차이균무통계학의의.②OSI치:SBK화FS-SBK조수술전후차이균무통계학의의.SMILE저도조술후OSI여술전비교,차이무통계학의의,중、고도조술후OSI승고,술후여술전비교,차이유통계학의의(F=8.316、8.789,P<0.01).③MTF cut-off치:FS-SBK조수술전후차이무통계학의의.SBK조화SMILE조중도근시술후1주여술전、술후1개월차이유통계학의의(F=4.469,P<0.05).굴광도대술후시각질량적영향:고、중、저도근시조내,술전화술후각시간점3충수술방식지간차이무통계학의의.결론 3충굴광수술술후시력명현제고,술식대술후시력영향불현저.중、고도근시SMILE술후현광지수승고,인차준분자격광절삭대감소현광비SMILE유우세.시각질량삼수MTF cut-off재FS-SBK수술전후변화불현저,이SBK화SMILE술후교술전유하강,재1주시명현,도1개월시상승,차기본접근술전수평,저충우세재중도근시교돌출.
Objective To investigate the influence of FS-SBK,SBK,and SMILE refractive surgeries on visual quality by analyzing variations in the glare index and the visual quality parameters of distinct refractive errors.Methods In this prosective cases control study,122 patients,who underwent SBK,FS-SBK or SMILE surgery,were enrolled from August to October 2013 and divided into high,moderate and low myopia groups.The glare index (opposite sector index,OSI) and modulation transfer function cut-off (MTF cut-off) were measured with a OQAS visual quality analyzing system preoperatively and one day,one week and one month postoperatively.Additional measurements were made to evaluate the differences among the three surgical methods.Results The effects on postoperative visual quality due to the different surgical procedures were as follows:①Vision:visual acuity improved after all surgeries and there were no significant differences among the results.②OSI:there was no statistically significant difference between SBK and FS-SBK.When compared with pre-operative OSI,there was a statistically significant difference between moderate and high myopia groups one week after SMILE surgery.③MTF cut-off:there were no statistically significant differences before and after surgery in the FS-SBK group,but there was a statistically significant difference from both SBK and SMILE surgeries in the moderate myopia group 1 week postoperatively compared with the preoperative period and 1 month postoperatively.However,there were no significant differences for the remaining time points.No significant differences were found between the different myopia groups.Conclusion Postoperative visual quality improves after the three surgical procedures discussed above.Due to a raised OSI after SMILE surgery,LASIK is the better option for high and moderate degrees of myopia.While the MTF cut-off did not vary significantly between pre-and postoperative FS-SBK,it decreased one week later after SBK and SMILE surgeries but recovered after one month in the moderate myopia group,even reverting to pre-operative levels.