中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志
中華眼視光學與視覺科學雜誌
중화안시광학여시각과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY OPHTHALMOLOGY AND VISUAL SCIENCE
2014年
7期
430-435
,共6页
金男%方一明%李晓霞%姚鹏翔%王振亮%蒋建伟
金男%方一明%李曉霞%姚鵬翔%王振亮%蔣建偉
금남%방일명%리효하%요붕상%왕진량%장건위
角膜磨镶术,激光原位,飞秒激光%飞秒激光小切口基质透镜取出术%角膜敏感性%Meta分析%循证医学
角膜磨鑲術,激光原位,飛秒激光%飛秒激光小切口基質透鏡取齣術%角膜敏感性%Meta分析%循證醫學
각막마양술,격광원위,비초격광%비초격광소절구기질투경취출술%각막민감성%Meta분석%순증의학
Keratomileusis,laser in situ,femtosecond laser%Small incision lenticule extraction%Corneal sensitivity%Meta analysis%Evidence-based medicine
目的 系统评价飞秒激光制瓣的LASIK(FS-LASIK)和SMILE治疗近视术后角膜敏感性的差异.方法 Meta分析.采用严密设计的检索策略检索Medline、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM disc)、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI),对比较FS-LASIK和SMILE术后角膜敏感性的文献进行Meta分析.分析内容主要包括术前,术后1周、1个月、3个月及6个月的中央角膜敏感性.采用RevMan 5.0进行统计分析,计量资料以加权均数差(WMD) (95%CI)为疗效分析统计量.对检索文献的证据等级按照Jadad量表进行评价.结果 共有4篇文献符合本研究的纳入标准,共198例(316眼).Meta分析结果显示:术前FS-LASIK和SMILE中央角膜敏感性差异无明显统计学意义(WMD=0.28,95%CI:-0.73~1.29,P>0.05);然而,术后1周、1个月、3个月及6个月两者差异均有明显统计学意义(WMD=-14.56,95%CI:-23.79~-5.34,P<0.01;WMD=-15.29,95%CI:-22.46~-8.11,P<0.01;WMD=-13.12,95%CI:-18.77~-7.46,P<0.01;WMD=-3.45,95%CI:-5.72~-1.18,P<0.01).结论 与FS-LASIK相比,SMILE术后角膜敏感性下降幅度可能更小,恢复更快;术后6个月时,SMILE术后角膜敏感性仍高于FS-LASIK.
目的 繫統評價飛秒激光製瓣的LASIK(FS-LASIK)和SMILE治療近視術後角膜敏感性的差異.方法 Meta分析.採用嚴密設計的檢索策略檢索Medline、Cochrane圖書館、中國生物醫學文獻數據庫(CBM disc)、中國期刊全文數據庫(CNKI),對比較FS-LASIK和SMILE術後角膜敏感性的文獻進行Meta分析.分析內容主要包括術前,術後1週、1箇月、3箇月及6箇月的中央角膜敏感性.採用RevMan 5.0進行統計分析,計量資料以加權均數差(WMD) (95%CI)為療效分析統計量.對檢索文獻的證據等級按照Jadad量錶進行評價.結果 共有4篇文獻符閤本研究的納入標準,共198例(316眼).Meta分析結果顯示:術前FS-LASIK和SMILE中央角膜敏感性差異無明顯統計學意義(WMD=0.28,95%CI:-0.73~1.29,P>0.05);然而,術後1週、1箇月、3箇月及6箇月兩者差異均有明顯統計學意義(WMD=-14.56,95%CI:-23.79~-5.34,P<0.01;WMD=-15.29,95%CI:-22.46~-8.11,P<0.01;WMD=-13.12,95%CI:-18.77~-7.46,P<0.01;WMD=-3.45,95%CI:-5.72~-1.18,P<0.01).結論 與FS-LASIK相比,SMILE術後角膜敏感性下降幅度可能更小,恢複更快;術後6箇月時,SMILE術後角膜敏感性仍高于FS-LASIK.
목적 계통평개비초격광제판적LASIK(FS-LASIK)화SMILE치료근시술후각막민감성적차이.방법 Meta분석.채용엄밀설계적검색책략검색Medline、Cochrane도서관、중국생물의학문헌수거고(CBM disc)、중국기간전문수거고(CNKI),대비교FS-LASIK화SMILE술후각막민감성적문헌진행Meta분석.분석내용주요포괄술전,술후1주、1개월、3개월급6개월적중앙각막민감성.채용RevMan 5.0진행통계분석,계량자료이가권균수차(WMD) (95%CI)위료효분석통계량.대검색문헌적증거등급안조Jadad량표진행평개.결과 공유4편문헌부합본연구적납입표준,공198례(316안).Meta분석결과현시:술전FS-LASIK화SMILE중앙각막민감성차이무명현통계학의의(WMD=0.28,95%CI:-0.73~1.29,P>0.05);연이,술후1주、1개월、3개월급6개월량자차이균유명현통계학의의(WMD=-14.56,95%CI:-23.79~-5.34,P<0.01;WMD=-15.29,95%CI:-22.46~-8.11,P<0.01;WMD=-13.12,95%CI:-18.77~-7.46,P<0.01;WMD=-3.45,95%CI:-5.72~-1.18,P<0.01).결론 여FS-LASIK상비,SMILE술후각막민감성하강폭도가능경소,회복경쾌;술후6개월시,SMILE술후각막민감성잉고우FS-LASIK.
Objective To evaluate and compare corneal sensitivity after Femtosecond LASIK (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) from a systematic review of literature.Methods This was a meta-analysis study.A systematic literature retrieval was conducted in Medline,the Cochrane Library,CBM disc,and CNKI.Central corneal sensitivity after FS-LASIK and SMILE was compared by meta-analysis,including pre-operation,1 week,1 month,3 months and 6 months post-operation.A statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software.Weighted mean difference (WMD) (95%CI) was used to analyze continuous variables.The quality of the included literature was scored according to the Jadad scale.Results A total of 4 studies with a total of 198 patients (316 eyes) in the literature met the inclusion criteria Meta analysis results showed that there was no difference in central corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and SMILE before surgery (WMD=0.28,95%CI:-0.73~ 1.29,P>0.05); however,1 week,1 month,3 months and 6 months after surgery,corneal sensitivity after SMILE was significantly higher than after FS-LASIK (WMD=-14.56,95%CI:-23.79~-5.34,P< 0.01; WMD=-15.29,95%CI:-22.46~-8.11,P<0.01; WMD=-13.12,95%CI:-18.77~-7.46,P<0.01;WMD=-3.45,95%CI:-5.72~-1.18,P<0.01).Conclusion Compared with FS-LASIK,central corneal sensitivity after SMILE has a smaller decrease and faster recovery.Corneal sensitivity after SMILE is still higher than FS-LASIK during the 6-month period after surgery.