国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2013年
14期
2103-2106
,共4页
冯仕娜%吴月意%吴兴华%李素珍
馮仕娜%吳月意%吳興華%李素珍
풍사나%오월의%오흥화%리소진
简化%护理记录%减少%书写量%提高%满意度
簡化%護理記錄%減少%書寫量%提高%滿意度
간화%호리기록%감소%서사량%제고%만의도
Simplify%Nursing records%Reduction%The amount of writing%Elevation%Satisfaction
目的 简化一般患者护理记录的模式,减少书写量,节省书写时间.方法 选择参与书写护理记录的护士共150人分两个时间段进行问卷调查;运用分层、随机、单盲的方法将150名参与书写护理记录的内、外科护士分为实验组和对照组,选择纳入标准病例,在使用表格式护理记录单的基础上,对照组实施现行的书写要求,实验组实施简化的书写要求,对两组记录从书写时间和质量方面进行测评分析.结果 问卷调查结果显示:现行书写护理记录的满意度明显低于简化护理记录的满意度(P<0.01).实验结果显示:两组的第一次护理记录,一次的护理过程记录,出院护理记录所用的时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组护理记录中监测数据的准确性、完整性、及时性、中医辩证施护内容比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 简化护理记录中与医师重复书写的内容,既遵行法律责任和保证护理安全的原则,又真正减少护士的书写量,缩短书写时间,提高工作效率和护理服务的满意度.
目的 簡化一般患者護理記錄的模式,減少書寫量,節省書寫時間.方法 選擇參與書寫護理記錄的護士共150人分兩箇時間段進行問捲調查;運用分層、隨機、單盲的方法將150名參與書寫護理記錄的內、外科護士分為實驗組和對照組,選擇納入標準病例,在使用錶格式護理記錄單的基礎上,對照組實施現行的書寫要求,實驗組實施簡化的書寫要求,對兩組記錄從書寫時間和質量方麵進行測評分析.結果 問捲調查結果顯示:現行書寫護理記錄的滿意度明顯低于簡化護理記錄的滿意度(P<0.01).實驗結果顯示:兩組的第一次護理記錄,一次的護理過程記錄,齣院護理記錄所用的時間差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);兩組護理記錄中鑑測數據的準確性、完整性、及時性、中醫辯證施護內容比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 簡化護理記錄中與醫師重複書寫的內容,既遵行法律責任和保證護理安全的原則,又真正減少護士的書寫量,縮短書寫時間,提高工作效率和護理服務的滿意度.
목적 간화일반환자호리기록적모식,감소서사량,절성서사시간.방법 선택삼여서사호리기록적호사공150인분량개시간단진행문권조사;운용분층、수궤、단맹적방법장150명삼여서사호리기록적내、외과호사분위실험조화대조조,선택납입표준병례,재사용표격식호리기록단적기출상,대조조실시현행적서사요구,실험조실시간화적서사요구,대량조기록종서사시간화질량방면진행측평분석.결과 문권조사결과현시:현행서사호리기록적만의도명현저우간화호리기록적만의도(P<0.01).실험결과현시:량조적제일차호리기록,일차적호리과정기록,출원호리기록소용적시간차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);량조호리기록중감측수거적준학성、완정성、급시성、중의변증시호내용비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 간화호리기록중여의사중복서사적내용,기준행법률책임화보증호리안전적원칙,우진정감소호사적서사량,축단서사시간,제고공작효솔화호리복무적만의도.
Objective To investigate the general patient care record mode,in order to reduce the amount of writing and writing time.Methods 150 nurses were selected and investigated about their writing and nursing records to answer questionnaire in two periods.All nurses were divided into experimental group and control group by stratified,randomized,single-blind method.We chose them to be included in the standard case,on the basis of the control group,control group used the current writing requirements,experimental group used the simply writing requirement.Finally we evaluated the two groups by writing time and the quality of the two sets of records.Results The survey results showed the existing writing nursing records' satisfaction was significantly lower than the simplified care records' satisfaction (P<0.01).The experimental results showed the differences of the time that groups first nursing records,the first nursing process record and discharged nursing records cost were significant (P<0.01) and the differences of accuracy,completeness,timeliness,Chinese medicine dialectical nursing between data in the two groups of nursing records were significant (P<0.05).Conclusions Compared with the control group,the experimental group simplifies the nursing records and physician repeated written content,can both comply with legal obligations and ensure the care and safety of principle,and really reduce the amount of nurses writing,shorten writing time,and improve working efficiency and satisfaction with nursing care.