中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2014年
5期
534-537
,共4页
临床护理带教%双向评价
臨床護理帶教%雙嚮評價
림상호리대교%쌍향평개
Clinical nursing teaching%Two-way evaluation
目的 建立双向评价体系,探讨双向测评在临床护理教学中的应用效果.方法 对2012年在我院神经内科实习的40名护生和负责带教工作的20名教师开展双向评价与单向评价试验.护生、带教教师采用信封法随机分为两组,实验组:护生20名,教师10名;对照组:护生20名,教师10名.制定护生实习情况评价表和带教教师带教水平评价表,两组教师均采用护生实习情况评价表每两周对护生表现进行一次评分,并将评分情况反馈给实验组护生.同时,实验组护生采用教师带教水平评价表每两周对同组教师进行一次评分,并反馈评分情况.采用SPSS13.0进行统计学分析,两组护生、带教教师得分与自身上一次得分比较采用配对样本均数t检验;实验组与对照组护生同期成绩比较采用两独立样本均数的t检验.结果 两组护生得分与自身上一次比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组带教教师得分与自身上一次比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);从第4周起,实验组与对照组护生同期得分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 双向评价体系有利于提高护生和带教教师的教学积极性与主动性,双向评价、双向互动利于及时发现教学问题并调整改进,可有效提升神经内科临床护理带教质量.
目的 建立雙嚮評價體繫,探討雙嚮測評在臨床護理教學中的應用效果.方法 對2012年在我院神經內科實習的40名護生和負責帶教工作的20名教師開展雙嚮評價與單嚮評價試驗.護生、帶教教師採用信封法隨機分為兩組,實驗組:護生20名,教師10名;對照組:護生20名,教師10名.製定護生實習情況評價錶和帶教教師帶教水平評價錶,兩組教師均採用護生實習情況評價錶每兩週對護生錶現進行一次評分,併將評分情況反饋給實驗組護生.同時,實驗組護生採用教師帶教水平評價錶每兩週對同組教師進行一次評分,併反饋評分情況.採用SPSS13.0進行統計學分析,兩組護生、帶教教師得分與自身上一次得分比較採用配對樣本均數t檢驗;實驗組與對照組護生同期成績比較採用兩獨立樣本均數的t檢驗.結果 兩組護生得分與自身上一次比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);實驗組帶教教師得分與自身上一次比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);從第4週起,實驗組與對照組護生同期得分比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 雙嚮評價體繫有利于提高護生和帶教教師的教學積極性與主動性,雙嚮評價、雙嚮互動利于及時髮現教學問題併調整改進,可有效提升神經內科臨床護理帶教質量.
목적 건립쌍향평개체계,탐토쌍향측평재림상호리교학중적응용효과.방법 대2012년재아원신경내과실습적40명호생화부책대교공작적20명교사개전쌍향평개여단향평개시험.호생、대교교사채용신봉법수궤분위량조,실험조:호생20명,교사10명;대조조:호생20명,교사10명.제정호생실습정황평개표화대교교사대교수평평개표,량조교사균채용호생실습정황평개표매량주대호생표현진행일차평분,병장평분정황반궤급실험조호생.동시,실험조호생채용교사대교수평평개표매량주대동조교사진행일차평분,병반궤평분정황.채용SPSS13.0진행통계학분석,량조호생、대교교사득분여자신상일차득분비교채용배대양본균수t검험;실험조여대조조호생동기성적비교채용량독립양본균수적t검험.결과 량조호생득분여자신상일차비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);실험조대교교사득분여자신상일차비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);종제4주기,실험조여대조조호생동기득분비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 쌍향평개체계유리우제고호생화대교교사적교학적겁성여주동성,쌍향평개、쌍향호동리우급시발현교학문제병조정개진,가유효제승신경내과림상호리대교질량.
Objective To establish a two-way evaluation system and to explore the application effect of two-way evaluation method in clinical nursing teaching.Methods We carried out two-way evaluation and individual evaluation test to 40 nursing students practicing in the Department of Inter nal Medicine of our hospital in 2012 and 20 teachers responsible for teaching.By using the envelope method,nursing students and teachers were randomly divided into two groups,with 20 nursing students and 10 teachers in the experimental group and the control group respectively.Students' assessment form and the teachers teaching level evaluation table were made,and teachers of both group gave scores every two weeks to the nursing students by nursing students' evaluation sheet,and the score of feedback were given to the nursing students in experimental group.At the same time,the nursing students in experimental group gave scores every two weeks to the teachers of the same group by the teachers' teaching evaluation sheet,and feedback the results.SPSS 13.0 was used to make statistical analysis and the scores of nursing students and teachers of both groups and the last scores were compared with paired sample T test of mean.The results of the experimental group and the control group in the same period were compared with two independent samples T test of mean.Results Comparing the nursing students'scores of both groups with the scores they themselves got last time,the scores of the fourth,sixth,and the eighth week were statistically significant(P<0.05)and comparing the experimental group teachers' score with and the scores they themselves got last time,the scores of the fourth,sixth,and the eighth week were also statistically significant(P<0.05); from the fourth week on,nursing students' scores in experimental group compared with those in control group in the same period,show the differences statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Two-way evaluation system is beneficial to improving the enthusiasm and initiative of the teachers and students.Two-way evaluation and bidirectional interaction are helpful to timely detection of problems and improvement and can effectively improve the quality of clinical nursing teaching in internal neurological medicine.