中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2013年
19期
2893-2895
,共3页
祝义军%冉国%刘晨霞%鲍杨%史东平
祝義軍%冉國%劉晨霞%鮑楊%史東平
축의군%염국%류신하%포양%사동평
麻醉%苏芬太尼%瑞芬太尼%芬太尼%老年人
痳醉%囌芬太尼%瑞芬太尼%芬太尼%老年人
마취%소분태니%서분태니%분태니%노년인
Anesthesia%Sufentanil%Remifentanil%Fentanyl%Aged
目的 观察等效剂量的苏芬太尼、瑞芬太尼、芬太尼用于老年患者全身麻醉诱导对心排血量和血流动力学的影响.方法 择期老年手术患者90例,按美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法分为苏芬太尼组(S组)、瑞芬太尼组(R组)和芬太尼组(F组),每组各30例.常规诱导,气管插管前采用盲法分别静脉注射苏芬太尼0.2 μg/kg、瑞芬太尼2μg/kg和芬太尼2μg/kg.分别测量并记录各组诱导前基础值(T0),诱导后(T1)、插管后1 min(T2)、插管后3min(T3)收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、心排血量(CO)、心指数(CI)和外周血管阻力(SVR)等心功能指标的变化,并记录不良反应:心动过缓、低血压等.结果 与基础值相比,各组诱导后MAP降低(P<0.05),R组CO下降(P<0.05),S组CO无明显变化.插管后R组MAP、CO有明显下降;F组MAP、HR有明显升高;S组患者的CO、MAP在诱导过程无明显波动(P>0.05).结论 苏芬太尼和瑞芬太尼用于老年患者麻醉诱导,抑制插管时应激反应的效果优于芬太尼,但是心血管稳定性方面苏芬太尼优于瑞芬太尼.
目的 觀察等效劑量的囌芬太尼、瑞芬太尼、芬太尼用于老年患者全身痳醉誘導對心排血量和血流動力學的影響.方法 擇期老年手術患者90例,按美國痳醉醫師協會(ASA)分級Ⅰ~Ⅱ級,採用隨機數字錶法分為囌芬太尼組(S組)、瑞芬太尼組(R組)和芬太尼組(F組),每組各30例.常規誘導,氣管插管前採用盲法分彆靜脈註射囌芬太尼0.2 μg/kg、瑞芬太尼2μg/kg和芬太尼2μg/kg.分彆測量併記錄各組誘導前基礎值(T0),誘導後(T1)、插管後1 min(T2)、插管後3min(T3)收縮壓(SBP)、舒張壓(DBP)、平均動脈壓(MAP)、心率(HR)、心排血量(CO)、心指數(CI)和外週血管阻力(SVR)等心功能指標的變化,併記錄不良反應:心動過緩、低血壓等.結果 與基礎值相比,各組誘導後MAP降低(P<0.05),R組CO下降(P<0.05),S組CO無明顯變化.插管後R組MAP、CO有明顯下降;F組MAP、HR有明顯升高;S組患者的CO、MAP在誘導過程無明顯波動(P>0.05).結論 囌芬太尼和瑞芬太尼用于老年患者痳醉誘導,抑製插管時應激反應的效果優于芬太尼,但是心血管穩定性方麵囌芬太尼優于瑞芬太尼.
목적 관찰등효제량적소분태니、서분태니、분태니용우노년환자전신마취유도대심배혈량화혈류동역학적영향.방법 택기노년수술환자90례,안미국마취의사협회(ASA)분급Ⅰ~Ⅱ급,채용수궤수자표법분위소분태니조(S조)、서분태니조(R조)화분태니조(F조),매조각30례.상규유도,기관삽관전채용맹법분별정맥주사소분태니0.2 μg/kg、서분태니2μg/kg화분태니2μg/kg.분별측량병기록각조유도전기출치(T0),유도후(T1)、삽관후1 min(T2)、삽관후3min(T3)수축압(SBP)、서장압(DBP)、평균동맥압(MAP)、심솔(HR)、심배혈량(CO)、심지수(CI)화외주혈관조력(SVR)등심공능지표적변화,병기록불량반응:심동과완、저혈압등.결과 여기출치상비,각조유도후MAP강저(P<0.05),R조CO하강(P<0.05),S조CO무명현변화.삽관후R조MAP、CO유명현하강;F조MAP、HR유명현승고;S조환자적CO、MAP재유도과정무명현파동(P>0.05).결론 소분태니화서분태니용우노년환자마취유도,억제삽관시응격반응적효과우우분태니,단시심혈관은정성방면소분태니우우서분태니.
Objective To compare the effects of equivalent dose sufentanil,remifentanil or fentanyl on hemodynamic and cardiac output in the elderly patients during induction of general anesthesia.Methods Ninety elderly patients(ASA Ⅰ ~ Ⅱ) undergoing elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into sufentanil group(group S),remifentanil group(group R) and fentanyl group(group F),30 patients in each group.Patients in group S,group R and group F received sufentanil 0.2μg/kg,remifentanil 2μg/kg and fentanyl 2μg/kg Ⅳ,respectively,using an blind method before intubation.SBP,DBP,MAP,HR,CO,CI and SVR were recorded before of anesthesia (T0),immediately after induction (T1),1,3 minutes after tracheal intubation (T2,T3).Changes of SBP and HR during observation were also recorded.Results The MAP and HR in three groups at T1 were significantly lower than those at T0 and decreased significantly in group R than those in group F and S(P <0.05).The MAP and HR in group F significantly increased at T1 than T0.The MAP and HR in group R were significantly decreased after tracheal intubation.Compared with the baseline,the MAP and HR in group S at T1,T2,remained unchanged.In group R,there were two patients whose HR were under 50 bpm.In group F,the MAP at T1,T2 were significantly higher than those at T.In group S,there were no significant changes in CO,CI,SVR which were all within normal range (P > 0.05).Conclusion Both sufentanil and remifentanil effectively inhibit the stress response during induction of general anesthesia.At the same time,sufentanil has better hemodynamic stability.