中国危重病急救医学
中國危重病急救醫學
중국위중병급구의학
CHINESE CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
2013年
1期
52-55
,共4页
吴绘%马铁柱%孙世中%苏娅%涂悦%张赛
吳繪%馬鐵柱%孫世中%囌婭%塗悅%張賽
오회%마철주%손세중%소아%도열%장새
神经源性肺水肿%脉搏指示连续心排血量监测%血管外肺水指数
神經源性肺水腫%脈搏指示連續心排血量鑑測%血管外肺水指數
신경원성폐수종%맥박지시련속심배혈량감측%혈관외폐수지수
Neurogenic pulmonary edema%Pulse induced contour cardiac output monitoring%Extravascular lung water index
目的 探讨脉搏指示连续心排血量(PiCCO)监测在神经源性肺水肿(NPE)患者中的应用,评估容量参数胸腔内血容量指数(ITBVI)、全心舒张期末容量指数(GEDVI)及压力参数中心静脉压(CVP)对NPE严重程度评估的准确性,评价血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)对NPE患者预后判断的意义.方法 采用前瞻性临床观察研究方法,对36例并发NPE的神经科危重患者,采用PiCCO监测平均动脉压(MAP)、心排血指数(CI)、CVP、ITBVI、GEDVI、EVLWI、肺血管通透性指数(PVPI)等指标,ITBVI、GEDVI、CVP与EVLWI之间进行相关性分析;根据患者结局分为死亡组与存活组,比较两组在治疗前及治疗3d的EVLWI变化.结果 EVLWI与ITBVI呈显著正相关(r=0.54,P<0.001),与GEDVI呈显著正相关(r=0.62,P<0.0001),而与CVP无显著相关性(r=0.12,P>0.05);PVPI、EVLWI与氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)均呈显著负相关(r=-0.55、P<0.001,r=-0.48、P< 0.05).存活组与死亡组治疗前EVLWI(ml/kg)水平差异无统计学意义(8.6±2.6比9.4±1.8,P>0.05);存活组治疗3d后EVLWI水平明显低于治疗前(6.92±1.64比8.64±2.62,P<0.05),且明显低于死亡组治疗3d后(6.92±1.64比9.88±2.44,P<0.05).结论 容量参数GEDVI、ITBVI比压力参数CVP评估NPE患者的EVLWI更为准确、可靠;NPE患者PVPI、EVLWI越高,PaO2/FiO2越低;动态观察NPE患者的EVLWI可评估预后.
目的 探討脈搏指示連續心排血量(PiCCO)鑑測在神經源性肺水腫(NPE)患者中的應用,評估容量參數胸腔內血容量指數(ITBVI)、全心舒張期末容量指數(GEDVI)及壓力參數中心靜脈壓(CVP)對NPE嚴重程度評估的準確性,評價血管外肺水指數(EVLWI)對NPE患者預後判斷的意義.方法 採用前瞻性臨床觀察研究方法,對36例併髮NPE的神經科危重患者,採用PiCCO鑑測平均動脈壓(MAP)、心排血指數(CI)、CVP、ITBVI、GEDVI、EVLWI、肺血管通透性指數(PVPI)等指標,ITBVI、GEDVI、CVP與EVLWI之間進行相關性分析;根據患者結跼分為死亡組與存活組,比較兩組在治療前及治療3d的EVLWI變化.結果 EVLWI與ITBVI呈顯著正相關(r=0.54,P<0.001),與GEDVI呈顯著正相關(r=0.62,P<0.0001),而與CVP無顯著相關性(r=0.12,P>0.05);PVPI、EVLWI與氧閤指數(PaO2/FiO2)均呈顯著負相關(r=-0.55、P<0.001,r=-0.48、P< 0.05).存活組與死亡組治療前EVLWI(ml/kg)水平差異無統計學意義(8.6±2.6比9.4±1.8,P>0.05);存活組治療3d後EVLWI水平明顯低于治療前(6.92±1.64比8.64±2.62,P<0.05),且明顯低于死亡組治療3d後(6.92±1.64比9.88±2.44,P<0.05).結論 容量參數GEDVI、ITBVI比壓力參數CVP評估NPE患者的EVLWI更為準確、可靠;NPE患者PVPI、EVLWI越高,PaO2/FiO2越低;動態觀察NPE患者的EVLWI可評估預後.
목적 탐토맥박지시련속심배혈량(PiCCO)감측재신경원성폐수종(NPE)환자중적응용,평고용량삼수흉강내혈용량지수(ITBVI)、전심서장기말용량지수(GEDVI)급압력삼수중심정맥압(CVP)대NPE엄중정도평고적준학성,평개혈관외폐수지수(EVLWI)대NPE환자예후판단적의의.방법 채용전첨성림상관찰연구방법,대36례병발NPE적신경과위중환자,채용PiCCO감측평균동맥압(MAP)、심배혈지수(CI)、CVP、ITBVI、GEDVI、EVLWI、폐혈관통투성지수(PVPI)등지표,ITBVI、GEDVI、CVP여EVLWI지간진행상관성분석;근거환자결국분위사망조여존활조,비교량조재치료전급치료3d적EVLWI변화.결과 EVLWI여ITBVI정현저정상관(r=0.54,P<0.001),여GEDVI정현저정상관(r=0.62,P<0.0001),이여CVP무현저상관성(r=0.12,P>0.05);PVPI、EVLWI여양합지수(PaO2/FiO2)균정현저부상관(r=-0.55、P<0.001,r=-0.48、P< 0.05).존활조여사망조치료전EVLWI(ml/kg)수평차이무통계학의의(8.6±2.6비9.4±1.8,P>0.05);존활조치료3d후EVLWI수평명현저우치료전(6.92±1.64비8.64±2.62,P<0.05),차명현저우사망조치료3d후(6.92±1.64비9.88±2.44,P<0.05).결론 용량삼수GEDVI、ITBVI비압력삼수CVP평고NPE환자적EVLWI경위준학、가고;NPE환자PVPI、EVLWI월고,PaO2/FiO2월저;동태관찰NPE환자적EVLWI가평고예후.
Objective To evaluate the application of pulse induced contour cardiac output (PiCCO)monitoring in patients with neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE),and to assess the accuracy of capacity parameters such as intra thoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) and global end diastolic volune index (GEDVI) and pressure parameters such as central venous pressure (CVP) in estimating severity of NPE,and to assess the prognostic significance of extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) on patients with NPE.Methods In this prospective study,36 patients with NPE in the department of neurological intensive care unit (NICU) underwent PiCCO monitoring,including mean arterial pressure (MAP),cardiac index (CI),CVP,ITBVI,GEDVI,EVLWI,pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI).The correlation between ITBVI,GEDVI,CVP and EVLWI was assessed.According to the outcome,these patients were divided into nonsurvivor group and survivor group.The change in EVLWI before and after treatment was compared between two groups.Results ITBVI,GEDVI were significantly and positively correlated with EVLWI,for the former r =0.54,P<0.001,and for the latter r=0.62,P<0.0001,but there was no significant correlation between CVP and EVLWI,r=0.12,P>0.05.PVPI,EVLWI were significantly and negatively correlated with oxygenation index (PaO2 / FiO2),for the former r=-0.55,P< 0.001,and for the latter r=-0.48,P<0.05.The difference in EVLWI (ml/kg) level before treatment between survivor group and nonsurvivor group was not statistically significant (8.6 ± 2.6 vs.9.4 ± 1.8,P>0.05).In survivor group,EVLW1 level obviously declined after treatment (6.92 ± 1.64 vs.8.64 ± 2.62,P<0.05),EVLWI level of survivor group was significantly lower than that of nonsurvivor group (6.92 ± 1.64 vs.9.88 ± 2.44,P<0.05).Conclusions Capacity parameters such as GEDVI,ITBVI can assess EVLWI of NPE patients accurately and reliably.In NPE patients,the higher the PVPI and EVLWI,the lower the PaO2 / FiO2.By dynamic observation of the trends of EVLWI in NPE patients,we are able to assess the prognosis of these patients.