中国危重病急救医学
中國危重病急救醫學
중국위중병급구의학
CHINESE CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
2013年
2期
96-98
,共3页
郭成成%王立祥%刘惠亮%窦微微%刘亚华%马立芝%孙鲲%马文君%郭晓东
郭成成%王立祥%劉惠亮%竇微微%劉亞華%馬立芝%孫鯤%馬文君%郭曉東
곽성성%왕립상%류혜량%두미미%류아화%마립지%손곤%마문군%곽효동
插入式腹主动脉按压%平均动脉压%冠状动脉灌注压%心肺复苏
插入式腹主動脈按壓%平均動脈壓%冠狀動脈灌註壓%心肺複囌
삽입식복주동맥안압%평균동맥압%관상동맥관주압%심폐복소
Interrupted abdominal aorta compression%Mean arterial pressure%Coronary perfusion pressure%Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
目的 探讨插入式腹主动脉按压心肺复苏法(IAAC-CPR)作为一种新的心肺复苏(CPR)方法,能否改善心搏骤停(CA)兔的复苏效果.方法 28只新西兰大白兔按随机数字表法分为标准心肺复苏组(STD-CPR,胸外按压)和IAAC-CPR组(于胸外按压间歇期给予腹主动脉按压),每组14只.冰氯化钾诱导CA模型,CA持续3 min后实施复苏.持续监测动物心电图、血流动力学指标,记录两组动物基础状态及复苏过程中主动脉收缩压、右房压直至实验结束;比较两组动物平均动脉压(MAP)、冠状动脉灌注压(CPP)和自主循环恢复(ROSC)等指标.结果 与STD-CPR组比较,IAAC-CPR组复苏2 min内(无升压药物干预)MAP(mm Hg,1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)明显升高(30 s:46.0±12.6比30.0±12.2,60 s:57.0±15.6比31.9±9.7,90 s:61.9±14.4比36.0±9.8,120 s:63.1±12.6比37.8±11.1,均P<0.05);CPP(mm Hg)也明显升高(30 s:29.9±17.4比14.1±11.0,60 s:43.1±22.4比14.3±9.8,90 s:46.7±20.1比15.9±7.7,120 s:50.5±21.0比17.3±9.9,均P<0.05);ROSC时间(s)明显提前(212.1±43.4比307.3±51.2,P<0.05),复苏成功率明显升高(85.7%比42.8%,P<0.05);ROSC率和24 h、48 h存活率也均升高,但差异均无统计学意义.所有动物实验后尸检未见明显腹部器官损伤.结论 于胸外按压间歇期给予腹主动脉按压(即IAAC-CPR),能增加CA兔的MAP、CPP及复苏成功率,有效改善复苏预后.
目的 探討插入式腹主動脈按壓心肺複囌法(IAAC-CPR)作為一種新的心肺複囌(CPR)方法,能否改善心搏驟停(CA)兔的複囌效果.方法 28隻新西蘭大白兔按隨機數字錶法分為標準心肺複囌組(STD-CPR,胸外按壓)和IAAC-CPR組(于胸外按壓間歇期給予腹主動脈按壓),每組14隻.冰氯化鉀誘導CA模型,CA持續3 min後實施複囌.持續鑑測動物心電圖、血流動力學指標,記錄兩組動物基礎狀態及複囌過程中主動脈收縮壓、右房壓直至實驗結束;比較兩組動物平均動脈壓(MAP)、冠狀動脈灌註壓(CPP)和自主循環恢複(ROSC)等指標.結果 與STD-CPR組比較,IAAC-CPR組複囌2 min內(無升壓藥物榦預)MAP(mm Hg,1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)明顯升高(30 s:46.0±12.6比30.0±12.2,60 s:57.0±15.6比31.9±9.7,90 s:61.9±14.4比36.0±9.8,120 s:63.1±12.6比37.8±11.1,均P<0.05);CPP(mm Hg)也明顯升高(30 s:29.9±17.4比14.1±11.0,60 s:43.1±22.4比14.3±9.8,90 s:46.7±20.1比15.9±7.7,120 s:50.5±21.0比17.3±9.9,均P<0.05);ROSC時間(s)明顯提前(212.1±43.4比307.3±51.2,P<0.05),複囌成功率明顯升高(85.7%比42.8%,P<0.05);ROSC率和24 h、48 h存活率也均升高,但差異均無統計學意義.所有動物實驗後尸檢未見明顯腹部器官損傷.結論 于胸外按壓間歇期給予腹主動脈按壓(即IAAC-CPR),能增加CA兔的MAP、CPP及複囌成功率,有效改善複囌預後.
목적 탐토삽입식복주동맥안압심폐복소법(IAAC-CPR)작위일충신적심폐복소(CPR)방법,능부개선심박취정(CA)토적복소효과.방법 28지신서란대백토안수궤수자표법분위표준심폐복소조(STD-CPR,흉외안압)화IAAC-CPR조(우흉외안압간헐기급여복주동맥안압),매조14지.빙록화갑유도CA모형,CA지속3 min후실시복소.지속감측동물심전도、혈류동역학지표,기록량조동물기출상태급복소과정중주동맥수축압、우방압직지실험결속;비교량조동물평균동맥압(MAP)、관상동맥관주압(CPP)화자주순배회복(ROSC)등지표.결과 여STD-CPR조비교,IAAC-CPR조복소2 min내(무승압약물간예)MAP(mm Hg,1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)명현승고(30 s:46.0±12.6비30.0±12.2,60 s:57.0±15.6비31.9±9.7,90 s:61.9±14.4비36.0±9.8,120 s:63.1±12.6비37.8±11.1,균P<0.05);CPP(mm Hg)야명현승고(30 s:29.9±17.4비14.1±11.0,60 s:43.1±22.4비14.3±9.8,90 s:46.7±20.1비15.9±7.7,120 s:50.5±21.0비17.3±9.9,균P<0.05);ROSC시간(s)명현제전(212.1±43.4비307.3±51.2,P<0.05),복소성공솔명현승고(85.7%비42.8%,P<0.05);ROSC솔화24 h、48 h존활솔야균승고,단차이균무통계학의의.소유동물실험후시검미견명현복부기관손상.결론 우흉외안압간헐기급여복주동맥안압(즉IAAC-CPR),능증가CA토적MAP、CPP급복소성공솔,유효개선복소예후.
Objective To determine whether interrupted abdominal aorta compression-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (IAAC-CPR),as an new cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) method,can improve resuscitation effects on rabbits with cardiac arrest (CA).Methods Twenty-eight New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into two groups in equal number (n =14),and they were resuscitated either by standard CPR (STD-CPR,external chest compression) or by IAAC-CPR (abdominal aorta compression at intermission of external chest compression).CA model was reproduced by injection of iced-potassium chloride,and it was maintained for 3 minutes before resuscitation.Electrocardiogram (ECG),hemodynamic indexes were monitored continuously.Aortic systolic pressure and right atrial pressure at baseline and during resuscitation were recorded.Mean arterial pressure (MAP),coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) indexes were compared between two groups.Results Compared with STD-CPR group,MAP (mm Hg,1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) within 2 minutes of resuscitation (without drugs intervention) in the IAAC-CPR group was significantly increased (30 s:46.0 ± 12.6 vs.30.0 ± 12.2,60 s:57.0 ± 15.6 vs.31.9 ±9.7,90 s:61.9 ± 14.4 vs.36.0 ±9.8,120 s:63.1 ± 12.6 vs.37.8 ± 11.1,all P<0.05),and CPP (mm Hg) was also significantly increased (30 s:29.9 ± 17.4 vs.14.1 ± 11.0,60 s:43.1 ± 22.4 vs.14.3 ± 9.8,90 s:46.7 ± 20.1 vs.15.9 ± 7.7,120 s:50.5 ± 21.0 vs.17.3 ± 9.9,all P<0.05),the time of ROSC (s) was earlier (212.1 ± 43.4 vs.307.3 ± 51.2,P<0.05),and successful resuscitation rate was significantly higher (85.7% vs.42.8%,P<0.05).However,there were no statistical differences in ROSC rate and the survivor rate at 24 hours and 48 hours between the two groups,though they were increased.No abdominal organs injury was found in all animals by postmortem study.Conclusion Abdominal aorta compression in the intermittent period of chest compression (IAAC-CPR) increases MAP,CPP and the successful rate of resuscitation,thus improves the outcome.