中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2012年
11期
1038-1041
,共4页
陈学全%董毅%Dennis R.Combs%汪凯%钟慧%夏海森%孔晓明%耿峰%方萍
陳學全%董毅%Dennis R.Combs%汪凱%鐘慧%夏海森%孔曉明%耿峰%方萍
진학전%동의%Dennis R.Combs%왕개%종혜%하해삼%공효명%경봉%방평
敌意%归因%问卷%信度%效度%精神分裂症
敵意%歸因%問捲%信度%效度%精神分裂癥
활의%귀인%문권%신도%효도%정신분렬증
Hostility%Attribution%Scale%Reliability%Validity%Schizophrenia
目的 分析中文版模棱两可、目的和敌意问卷(AIHQ-C)的信度和效度.方法 采用中文版模棱两可、目的和敌意问卷(AIHQ-C)对303名正常健康者和202名精神分裂症患者进行评估,间隔两周后,随机抽取110名正常健康者和70名患者进行重测,并以偏执量表(Pa)为效标,计算校标关联效度.结果 信度检验:AIHQ-C的敌意偏向总分(THB)、责备偏向总分(TBB)和攻击偏向总分(TAB)的Cronbach α系数分别为0.78,0.94,0.84(P<0.01),每个场景下敌意偏向分(HB)、责备偏向分(BB)和攻击偏向分(AB)的Cronbach α系数在0.51 ~0.90之间.AIHQ-C的THB、TBB和TAB的重测信度分别为0.71,0.73,0.68(P<0.01),每个场景下HB、BB和AB的重测信度在0.48~0.73之间.效度检验:AIHQ-C的THB、TBB和TAB与Pa的相关系数分别为0.51,0.37,0.41 (P<0.01),每个场景下HB、BB和AB与Pa的相关系 数在0.23~0.52之间,表明AIHQ-C具有较好的校标关联效度.精神分裂症患者AIHQ-C的THB、TBB和 TAB及其每个场景下HB、BB和AB的得分显著高于正常者,表明AIHQ-C具有较好的实证效度.结论 AIHQ-C具有较好的信度和效度,适合评估精神分裂症患者和正常人群的敌意归因偏向.
目的 分析中文版模稜兩可、目的和敵意問捲(AIHQ-C)的信度和效度.方法 採用中文版模稜兩可、目的和敵意問捲(AIHQ-C)對303名正常健康者和202名精神分裂癥患者進行評估,間隔兩週後,隨機抽取110名正常健康者和70名患者進行重測,併以偏執量錶(Pa)為效標,計算校標關聯效度.結果 信度檢驗:AIHQ-C的敵意偏嚮總分(THB)、責備偏嚮總分(TBB)和攻擊偏嚮總分(TAB)的Cronbach α繫數分彆為0.78,0.94,0.84(P<0.01),每箇場景下敵意偏嚮分(HB)、責備偏嚮分(BB)和攻擊偏嚮分(AB)的Cronbach α繫數在0.51 ~0.90之間.AIHQ-C的THB、TBB和TAB的重測信度分彆為0.71,0.73,0.68(P<0.01),每箇場景下HB、BB和AB的重測信度在0.48~0.73之間.效度檢驗:AIHQ-C的THB、TBB和TAB與Pa的相關繫數分彆為0.51,0.37,0.41 (P<0.01),每箇場景下HB、BB和AB與Pa的相關繫 數在0.23~0.52之間,錶明AIHQ-C具有較好的校標關聯效度.精神分裂癥患者AIHQ-C的THB、TBB和 TAB及其每箇場景下HB、BB和AB的得分顯著高于正常者,錶明AIHQ-C具有較好的實證效度.結論 AIHQ-C具有較好的信度和效度,適閤評估精神分裂癥患者和正常人群的敵意歸因偏嚮.
목적 분석중문판모릉량가、목적화활의문권(AIHQ-C)적신도화효도.방법 채용중문판모릉량가、목적화활의문권(AIHQ-C)대303명정상건강자화202명정신분렬증환자진행평고,간격량주후,수궤추취110명정상건강자화70명환자진행중측,병이편집량표(Pa)위효표,계산교표관련효도.결과 신도검험:AIHQ-C적활의편향총분(THB)、책비편향총분(TBB)화공격편향총분(TAB)적Cronbach α계수분별위0.78,0.94,0.84(P<0.01),매개장경하활의편향분(HB)、책비편향분(BB)화공격편향분(AB)적Cronbach α계수재0.51 ~0.90지간.AIHQ-C적THB、TBB화TAB적중측신도분별위0.71,0.73,0.68(P<0.01),매개장경하HB、BB화AB적중측신도재0.48~0.73지간.효도검험:AIHQ-C적THB、TBB화TAB여Pa적상관계수분별위0.51,0.37,0.41 (P<0.01),매개장경하HB、BB화AB여Pa적상관계 수재0.23~0.52지간,표명AIHQ-C구유교호적교표관련효도.정신분렬증환자AIHQ-C적THB、TBB화 TAB급기매개장경하HB、BB화AB적득분현저고우정상자,표명AIHQ-C구유교호적실증효도.결론 AIHQ-C구유교호적신도화효도,괄합평고정신분렬증환자화정상인군적활의귀인편향.
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese-version of the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire(AIHQ-C).Methods 303 healthy subjects and 202 schizophrenic patients were asked to completed the AIHQ-C along with measures of Paranoia Scale (Pa).Two weeks later,110 healthy subjects and 70 schizophrenic patients who were randomly selected from the total sample completed the AIHQ-C again to compute the test-retest reliability.The criterion-related validity was evaluated by correlating the AIHQ-C with Pa.Results (1)The Cronbach α coefficient of total Hostility Bias(THB),total Blame Bias(TBB) and total Aggression Bias (TAB) for the AIHQ-C was 0.78,0.94,0.84 (P < 0.01) respectively,and the Cronbach α coefficient of Hostility Bias(HB),Blame Bias (BB)and Aggression Bias (AB)for each situation of the AIHQ-C was between 0.51 and 0.90.The test-retest reliability of THB,TBB and TAB for the AIHQ-C was 0.71,0.73,0.68 (P < 0.01) respectively,and the test-retest reliability of HB,BB and AB for each situation of the AIHQ-C was between 0.48and 0.73.(2) Pa was positively correlated with THB,TBB and TAB (r =0.51,0.37,0.41,P < 0.01,respectively) and the correlation coefficients of HB,BB and AB for each situation of the AIHQ-C with Pa was between 0.23and 0.52.The results indicated that the AIHQ-C had good criterion-related validity.(3)Schizophrenic patients had higher scores of the AIHQ-C than the healthy subjects,it suggested that the AIHQ-C had good discriminant validity.Conclusion The AIHQ-C has good reliability and validity in application to Chinese people.