中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2013年
4期
314-316
,共3页
陈晓慧%孙海莲%苗文哲%安钢辉%陈力
陳曉慧%孫海蓮%苗文哲%安鋼輝%陳力
진효혜%손해련%묘문철%안강휘%진력
认知行为疗法%生活质量%强迫症%青少年
認知行為療法%生活質量%彊迫癥%青少年
인지행위요법%생활질량%강박증%청소년
Cognitive behavior therapy%Quality of life%Obsessive-compulsive disorder%Adolescents
目的 探讨认知行为疗法联合药物治疗青少年强迫症的效果以及对生活质量的影响.方法 使用耶鲁布朗强迫量表(Y-BOCS)和儿童少年生活质量量表(QLSCA)及自编问卷对心理门诊就诊的123例青少年强迫症患者进行问卷调查,采用t检验和x2检验统计数据.结果 12周末药物治疗组有效率64.52%;联合治疗组有效率80.33%,24周末药物治疗组有效率77.42%;联合治疗组有效率91.8%,两组疗效差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05);两组治疗前后有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组治疗12周未有效率组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),24周末有效率组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗24周后两组患者在生活质量总体评价和负性情绪方面比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在自我满意度、同伴关系、学习能力和态度方面比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).结论 认知行为疗法联合药物治疗比单纯药物治疗有更好的疗效,可显著改善青少年强迫症患者生活质量.
目的 探討認知行為療法聯閤藥物治療青少年彊迫癥的效果以及對生活質量的影響.方法 使用耶魯佈朗彊迫量錶(Y-BOCS)和兒童少年生活質量量錶(QLSCA)及自編問捲對心理門診就診的123例青少年彊迫癥患者進行問捲調查,採用t檢驗和x2檢驗統計數據.結果 12週末藥物治療組有效率64.52%;聯閤治療組有效率80.33%,24週末藥物治療組有效率77.42%;聯閤治療組有效率91.8%,兩組療效差異有統計學意義(P< 0.05);兩組治療前後有效率比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);兩組治療12週未有效率組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),24週末有效率組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).治療24週後兩組患者在生活質量總體評價和負性情緒方麵比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);在自我滿意度、同伴關繫、學習能力和態度方麵比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).結論 認知行為療法聯閤藥物治療比單純藥物治療有更好的療效,可顯著改善青少年彊迫癥患者生活質量.
목적 탐토인지행위요법연합약물치료청소년강박증적효과이급대생활질량적영향.방법 사용야로포랑강박량표(Y-BOCS)화인동소년생활질량량표(QLSCA)급자편문권대심리문진취진적123례청소년강박증환자진행문권조사,채용t검험화x2검험통계수거.결과 12주말약물치료조유효솔64.52%;연합치료조유효솔80.33%,24주말약물치료조유효솔77.42%;연합치료조유효솔91.8%,량조료효차이유통계학의의(P< 0.05);량조치료전후유효솔비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);량조치료12주미유효솔조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),24주말유효솔조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).치료24주후량조환자재생활질량총체평개화부성정서방면비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);재자아만의도、동반관계、학습능력화태도방면비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).결론 인지행위요법연합약물치료비단순약물치료유경호적료효,가현저개선청소년강박증환자생활질량.
Objective To investigate the effect of cognitive behavior therapy combined with drug treatment of adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder(OCD) and the effect on quality of life.Method Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and quality of life in children and adolescents scale (QLSCA) were used to assess the curative effect and quality of life for 123 adolescents with OCD on the psychological clinic in hospital.t test and one way-ANOVA test were used to analyze the data.Results The effective rate of drug treatment group was 64.52% after 12 weeks and combined treatment group was 80.33%.The effective rate of drug treatment group was 77.42% after 24 weeks and combined treatment group was 91.8%.There was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).Two groups before and after treatment had significant difference (P < 0.01).There was significant difference between the two groups after 12 weeks (P< 0.01) and 24 weeks (P < 0.05).After 24 weeks of treatment,two groups of patients in the overall evaluation of the quality of life and negative ernotion had significant differences (P < 0.05) and in self satisfaction,peer relationship,learning ability and attitude had significant differences (P < 0.01).Conclusion Combination therapy is better than simple drug treatment,and improves the quality of life better.