中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2013年
10期
949-951
,共3页
无法忍受不确定性%信度%效度%心理测量学研究
無法忍受不確定性%信度%效度%心理測量學研究
무법인수불학정성%신도%효도%심리측량학연구
Intolerance of uncertainty%Reliability%Validity%Psychometric studies
目的 探讨无法忍受不确定性量表(IUS)中文修订版的信度和效度.方法 采用中文版IUS先后共测量了930名大学生,选取45名大学生3周后进行重测.采用焦虑自评量表和自评抑郁量表作为效标.结果 修订后的IUS共21个项目,探索性因素分析得到一个两因子结构,分别命名为“消极信念和情绪”与“消极行为和自我参照”,累积解释率为42.09％.验证性因素分析结果(x2/df=2.82,GFI=0.90,TLI =0.90,CFI =0.91,RMSEA=0.065)表明两因子结构较为理想.总量表及两个分量表的内部一致性信度分别为0.929,0.885和0.864,重测信度分别为0.782,0.766和0.714.IUS总分及其2个因子分均与焦虑、抑郁得分显著正相关(r=0.489～0.575,P＜0.01).结论 IUS中文修订版具有较好的信度和效度,可作为我国成人无法忍受不确定性的有效评估工具.
目的 探討無法忍受不確定性量錶(IUS)中文脩訂版的信度和效度.方法 採用中文版IUS先後共測量瞭930名大學生,選取45名大學生3週後進行重測.採用焦慮自評量錶和自評抑鬱量錶作為效標.結果 脩訂後的IUS共21箇項目,探索性因素分析得到一箇兩因子結構,分彆命名為“消極信唸和情緒”與“消極行為和自我參照”,纍積解釋率為42.09％.驗證性因素分析結果(x2/df=2.82,GFI=0.90,TLI =0.90,CFI =0.91,RMSEA=0.065)錶明兩因子結構較為理想.總量錶及兩箇分量錶的內部一緻性信度分彆為0.929,0.885和0.864,重測信度分彆為0.782,0.766和0.714.IUS總分及其2箇因子分均與焦慮、抑鬱得分顯著正相關(r=0.489～0.575,P＜0.01).結論 IUS中文脩訂版具有較好的信度和效度,可作為我國成人無法忍受不確定性的有效評估工具.
목적 탐토무법인수불학정성량표(IUS)중문수정판적신도화효도.방법 채용중문판IUS선후공측량료930명대학생,선취45명대학생3주후진행중측.채용초필자평량표화자평억욱량표작위효표.결과 수정후적IUS공21개항목,탐색성인소분석득도일개량인자결구,분별명명위“소겁신념화정서”여“소겁행위화자아삼조”,루적해석솔위42.09％.험증성인소분석결과(x2/df=2.82,GFI=0.90,TLI =0.90,CFI =0.91,RMSEA=0.065)표명량인자결구교위이상.총량표급량개분량표적내부일치성신도분별위0.929,0.885화0.864,중측신도분별위0.782,0.766화0.714.IUS총분급기2개인자분균여초필、억욱득분현저정상관(r=0.489～0.575,P＜0.01).결론 IUS중문수정판구유교호적신도화효도,가작위아국성인무법인수불학정성적유효평고공구.
Objective To explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese revised version of the Intolerance of uncertainty scale(IUS).Methods A total of 930 college students completed the IUS.45 college students participated in the retest 3 weeks later.The self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and the self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used as criterions for assessment of the validity of the Chinese revised version of IUS.Results The Chinese revised version of IUS contained 21 items.Exploratory factor analysis found a two-factor model (negative belief and emotional experience,behavioral dysfunction and negative self-reference) with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 42.09％.And the results of Confirmatory factor analysis (x 2/df =2.82,GFI =0.90,TLI =0.90,CFI =0.91,RMSEA =0.065) indicated that this model provided a reasonable good fit for Chinese college students.The Cronbach α of internal consistency reliability were good for IUS and two subscales,which were 0.929,0.885 and 0.864,respectively.The test-retest reliabilities for IUS and two subscales were 0.782,0.766 and 0.714 respectively.The IUS scores were positively correlated with the scores of SAS and SDS (r =0.489 ～0.575,P ＜ 0.001).Conclusion It suggests that the Chinese revised version of IUS has good reliability and validity,which is qualified enough for relevant research and applications for Chinese adults.
