中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2014年
1期
33-36
,共4页
病前智力%血管性认知功能障碍%脑梗死%中华成人智力量表
病前智力%血管性認知功能障礙%腦梗死%中華成人智力量錶
병전지력%혈관성인지공능장애%뇌경사%중화성인지역량표
Premorbid intelligence%Vascular cognitive impairment%Cerebral infarction%The intelligence Scale for Chinese Adults
目的 探讨脑梗死患者的病前智力估计方法.方法 使用10个回归公式估计74名脑梗死患者及其健康配对者的智商,选出脑梗死病人的智商估计方法.将优选出的估计智商转换为标准分,考察它们与“不保持”分测验的标准分的差距.结果 健康组的估计智商与实测智商均数差距都小于1,相关系数为0.755～ 0.956;脑梗死组估计智商平均高于实测智商3.20～10.67.脑梗死组估计智商低于健康组0.83～8.28,但其中单用人口统计变量、联合人口统计变量与常识测验或图形推理的测验成绩的估计智商只有0.26、0.24、0.38等小的组间效应.病人组采用后两种方法估计的标准分形式的病前智力水平分别高于数字符号标准分0.70、0.63分,高于积木构图0.67、0.61分,而对照组的对应值为0.21、0.21、0.12、0.12,差值的组间差异有统计学意义.结论 建议联合人口统计变量与常识测验或图形推论的测验成绩估计脑梗死患者的病前智力水平.
目的 探討腦梗死患者的病前智力估計方法.方法 使用10箇迴歸公式估計74名腦梗死患者及其健康配對者的智商,選齣腦梗死病人的智商估計方法.將優選齣的估計智商轉換為標準分,攷察它們與“不保持”分測驗的標準分的差距.結果 健康組的估計智商與實測智商均數差距都小于1,相關繫數為0.755～ 0.956;腦梗死組估計智商平均高于實測智商3.20～10.67.腦梗死組估計智商低于健康組0.83～8.28,但其中單用人口統計變量、聯閤人口統計變量與常識測驗或圖形推理的測驗成績的估計智商隻有0.26、0.24、0.38等小的組間效應.病人組採用後兩種方法估計的標準分形式的病前智力水平分彆高于數字符號標準分0.70、0.63分,高于積木構圖0.67、0.61分,而對照組的對應值為0.21、0.21、0.12、0.12,差值的組間差異有統計學意義.結論 建議聯閤人口統計變量與常識測驗或圖形推論的測驗成績估計腦梗死患者的病前智力水平.
목적 탐토뇌경사환자적병전지력고계방법.방법 사용10개회귀공식고계74명뇌경사환자급기건강배대자적지상,선출뇌경사병인적지상고계방법.장우선출적고계지상전환위표준분,고찰타문여“불보지”분측험적표준분적차거.결과 건강조적고계지상여실측지상균수차거도소우1,상관계수위0.755～ 0.956;뇌경사조고계지상평균고우실측지상3.20～10.67.뇌경사조고계지상저우건강조0.83～8.28,단기중단용인구통계변량、연합인구통계변량여상식측험혹도형추리적측험성적적고계지상지유0.26、0.24、0.38등소적조간효응.병인조채용후량충방법고계적표준분형식적병전지력수평분별고우수자부호표준분0.70、0.63분,고우적목구도0.67、0.61분,이대조조적대응치위0.21、0.21、0.12、0.12,차치적조간차이유통계학의의.결론 건의연합인구통계변량여상식측험혹도형추론적측험성적고계뇌경사환자적병전지력수평.
Objective To explore the methods for estimating premorbid intelligence of patients with cerebral infarction.Methods Ten regression equations were employed to estimate intelligence quotients (IQs) of 74 patients and 74 demographically matched,healthy adults.Those valid estimated IQs were transformed into standard scores and adopted to evaluate the difference with don' t hold' subtests.Results In the healthy group,there were trivial difference between the estimated IQs and obtained IQs with mean discrepancy less than one and the correlation coefficients between them ranged from 0.755 to 0.956.However in the patients group,the estimated IQs were significantly higher than obtained IQs with mean discrepancy of 3.20-10.67.Mean estimated IQs of the patient group were lower than those of healthy group to varing degrees with mean discrepancy of 0.83-8.28,in which the mean IQs estimated just with demographic variables showed small between group effect size of 0.26,and so did IQs estimated with combination of demographic variables and performance on the Information or Figural Matrix (effect size:0.24 and 0.38 respectively).The latter two kinds of estimated IQs were adopted and transformed into standard scores to estimate premorbid intelligence.The two kinds of estimated normal scores of intelligence were higher than normal scores of the Digit Symbol (0.70 and 0.63 respectively) and the Block Design(0.67 and 0.61 respectively)in the patients group.As regarding the healthy group,the counterparts of discrepancies between estimates of intelligence and obtained scores were 0.21,0.21,0.12 and 0.12 respectively,which were significantly smaller than those in the patients group.Conclusion IQ estimated with combination of demographic variables and performance on the Information or Figural Matrix are suggested to estimate premorbid intelligence of patients with cerebral infarction.
